Now ‘Costa Concordia’ has gone, what lies ahead for the island of Giglio?

The feared environmental disaster after the cruise ship ran aground has not materialised – yet

Sat, Jul 26, 2014, 01:00

On the lovely Italian island of Giglio they have been dealing with shipwrecks for quite some time. Archaeologists have discovered the remains of Etruscan and ancient Roman boats nearby, but the Costa Concordia was dramatically different.

From the night in January 2012 – Friday 13th, in fact – when the ship ran aground off Giglio, with the loss of 32 lives, one worry has dominated the concerns of nature lovers, environmentalists and the islanders: would this 290m-long, 114,000- gross-tonne monster ruin one of Italy’s lesser-known paradises.

Giglio is on the Tuscan archipelago, 15km from the mainland, surrounded by one of Europe’s most important maritime sanctuaries. Its estimated 500sq km of sea, comprising islands such as Elba, of Napoleonic fame, and Montecristo, of Dumas fame, flow with clean waters where molluscs, sea bass, tuna and dolphins thrive.

Giglio itself is a craggy sort of place, its rocky landscape overrun by native shrubs, such as juniper, rosemary and lavender, and by cypress trees, mastic trees and much else besides.

A small island with a 27km coastline, Giglio is inhabited by about 2,000 residents. Before the Concordia it was visited by about 24,000 tourists a year, many of them attracted by the island’s natural delights, be they fauna or fowl, scuba diving or hilltop striding. In short, today’s Giglio is an environmentalist’s paradise where almost the only economic activity is tourism.

When Costa Concordia ran aground, with its 500,000 gallons of fuel, not to mention five restaurants’ worth of food and 1,300 gallons of olive oil, as well as paints, cleaning fuels and other substances, an environmental disaster of monumental proportions was on the cards – not only for Giglio and the Tuscan archipelago but also for the nearby French island of Corsica.

So far that disaster has been avoided. The first and arguably most pressing emergency was the removal of the engine fuel, an operation carried out by the Dutch Smit Salvage company in the weeks immediately after the disaster.

Yet when, this week, the Concordia was finally towed away from the island after 30 months lying just metres from shore, beside the port of Giglio, it left behind a big question mark. Can we be certain that no lasting environmental or economic damage has been inflicted on the island?

Sitting in his small office on the harbourside, Giglio’s mayor, Sergio Ortelli, argues that the island faces two main priorities: a thorough clean-up of the site where the Concordia has been stuck since 2012 and the need to win back its traditional tourists.

The mayor says Giglio has gained little or nothing from the international publicity generated by the Concordia. It is true that restaurants and bars in the port had a bonanza, as the 30-month presence of salvage workers, divers, navy experts, police and (less continuously) the media saw them do the equivalent of five very busy summers’ work in just two years.

The impact of that bonanza is plain for all to see. When the media first stomped out here, in January 2012, we found a harbour front of decent but rundown bars and restaurants that had understandable difficulty dealing with the invasion. Now the port has elegant and chic bars that make it look like a cross between Portofino and Palma de Mallorca.

Sign In

Forgot Password?

Sign Up

The name that will appear beside your comments.

Have an account? Sign In

Forgot Password?

Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In or Sign Up

Thank you

You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.

Hello, .

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

Thank you for registering. Please check your email to verify your account.

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.
From Monday 20th October 2014 we're changing how readers sign-in to comment, click here for more information.