Stocktake: ‘Pain trade’ may drive market rebound

Proinsias O’Mahony takes a look at the ups and downs of the stock market

 

Mounting fears regarding a global slowdown have hit stocks recently, but Merrill Lynch’s latest monthly fund manager survey indicates a rebound may be in the offing.

Chinese and emerging market (EM) woes coupled with plunging oil and commodity prices have dominated headlines lately, catalysing double-digit corrections in the miner-laden FTSE and the exporter-dominated German Dax. Investors are also iffy towards the US, where a rate hike looms, underweighting US equities for six consecutive months.

Uncertainty has resulted in EM allocations hitting all-time lows while allocations towards energy stocks are at 13-year lows. Additionally, fund managers are holding much more cash than normal.

Merrill’s survey is best viewed in a contrarian light, with extreme readings indicative of turning points. The current sentiment towards energy and EM equities has the whiff of capitulation about it, potentially driving what Merrill calls a “late-summer pain trade” as well as fresh all-time highs for US stocks prior to a possible rate hike next month.

Such talk may seem fanciful but markets can turn quickly. Additionally – and counterintuitively – a US rally would be in keeping with history. Allianz looked at US stock performance prior to the first interest rate hikes in past market cycles over the last three decades. On five of six occasions, stocks rallied in the run-up.

 

Stock-pickers feeling gloomy

Global fund managers aren’t alone in feeling wary towards US stocks.

Bullish sentiment among ordinary investors has been below historical norms for 23 consecutive weeks, according to American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) polls. The latest Investors’ Intelligence poll, which tracks newsletter writers, shows sentiment is at 10-month lows. Other measures are similarly pessimistic.

Typically, such bearishness is only seen after sizable corrections – not when indices are just a few percentage points below all-time highs. The explanation, perhaps, is this feels like a bear market for many stock-pickers. Michael Batnick of Ritholtz Asset Management notes the average stock in the Russell 3000, which covers 98 per cent of the US market, is already in bear market territory. That shows how weak market breadth is at the moment; large-cap strength is masking broader weakness.

However, while the current stats are quite extreme, Batnick notes it’s not uncommon for a handful of stocks to do the heavy lifting. US stocks have returned 9.9 per cent annually since 1926 but that falls to 6.5 per cent if you exclude the top decile of performers. Exclude the top quartile of performers, and average annual returns fall below zero, he adds.

Stock-pickers should remember indexing guru John Bogle’s advice – don’t bother trying to find the needle in the haystack, just buy the haystack.

 

Volatility subdued . . . for now

Sentiment is poor at the moment but it’s not apocalyptic.

Despite the European market selloff, Merrill’s survey shows the vast majority of fund managers want to overweight Europe over the next year. The VStoxx – Europe’s volatility index – is well shy of levels hit during last month’s panic over Greece; indeed, it’s still below its historical average.

The same is true of the Vix, the US fear index. It spiked higher last week but remains below its historical average, and is nowhere near levels seen during market panics.

Similarly, while emerging market currencies have been all over the place, volatility among developed market currencies is again slightly below average levels.

In short, there’s no panic – not yet anyway.

 

Defying gravity in China

Two-thirds of global investors believe the Chinese market remains in bubble territory, the Merrill survey found, and it seems domestic Chinese investors agree.

Authorities said last month they wanted the Shanghai index, which had plunged from above 5,100 to 3,500, to head back up towards 4,500. Despite an intense propaganda effort, stocks have remained weak, and would likely have fallen below 3,500 last week were it not for suspected government intervention. China’s wealthiest investors are especially wary, deserting the market at a much quicker rate than their less well-funded brethren.

The rebound effort has been especially weak when one remembers the strongest rallies can occur in bear markets. The Nasdaq, for example, managed two big rallies in the months after the technology bubble burst in March 2000, rebounding 25 per cent and 41 per cent before eventually hitting new lows.

China’s rebound has paled in comparison. The government’s gravity-defying efforts appear doomed to fail.

 

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.