GOP’s war on the unemployed is cruel and counterproductive

Cutting of benefits a case of mean-spiritedness converging with bad economic analysis

Hundreds of people line up to attend a job fair in New York City. Photograph: John Moore/Getty Images

Hundreds of people line up to attend a job fair in New York City. Photograph: John Moore/Getty Images


Is life too easy for the unemployed? You may not think so, and I certainly don’t. But that, remarkably, is what many and perhaps most Republicans believe. And they’re acting on that belief: there’s a nationwide movement under way to punish the unemployed based on the proposition that we can cure unemployment by making the jobless even more miserable.

Consider, for example, the case of North Carolina. The state was hit hard by the Great Recession, and its unemployment rate, at 8.8 per cent, is among the highest in the nation, higher than in long-suffering California or Michigan. As is the case everywhere, many of the jobless have been out of work for six months or more thanks to a national environment in which there are three times as many people seeking work as there are job openings.

Nonetheless, the state’s government has just sharply cut aid to the unemployed. In fact the Republicans controlling that government were so eager to cut off aid that they didn’t just reduce the duration of benefits; they also reduced the average weekly benefit, making the state ineligible for about $700 million in federal aid to the long-term unemployed.

Federal aid
It’s quite a spectacle but North Carolina isn’t alone: A number of states have cut unemployment benefits, although none at the price of losing federal aid.

And, at national level, Congress has been allowing extended benefits introduced during the economic crisis to expire even though long-term unemployment remains at historic highs.

So what’s going on here? Is it just cruelty? Well, the GOP – which believes that 47 per cent of Americans are “takers” mooching off the job creators – isn’t exactly overflowing with compassion.

But the war on the unemployed isn’t motivated solely by cruelty; it’s a case of mean spiritedness converging with bad economic analysis.

In general modern conservatives believe our national character is being sapped by social programmes that, in the memorable words of Paul Ryan, chairman of the House Budget Committee, “turn the safety net into a hammock that lulls able-bodied people to lives of dependency and complacency”.

More specifically they believe that unemployment insurance encourages jobless workers to stay unemployed rather than taking available jobs.

Is there anything to this belief? The average unemployment benefit in North Carolina is $299 a week pretax; some hammock. Anyone who imagines that unemployed workers are deliberately choosing to live a life of leisure has no idea what the experience of unemployment, and especially long-term unemployment, is really like.

Still, there is evidence that unemployment benefits make workers more choosy in their job search. When the economy is booming this extra choosiness may raise the “non-accelerating-inflation” unemployment rate – the unemployment rate at which inflation starts to rise, inducing the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates and choke economic expansion.

All of this is, however, irrelevant to our current situation in which inflation is not a concern and the Fed’s problem is that it can’t get interest rates low enough. While cutting unemployment benefits will make the unemployed even more desperate, it will do nothing to create more jobs.

But wait – what about supply and demand? Won’t making the unemployed desperate put downward pressure on wages? And won’t lower labour costs encourage job growth? No, that’s a fallacy of composition.

Cutting one worker’s wage may help save his or her job by making that worker cheaper than competing workers but cutting everyone’s wages just reduces everyone’s income – and it worsens the burden of debt, which is one of the main forces holding the economy back.

Oh, and let’s not forget that cutting benefits to the unemployed, many of whom are living hand-to-mouth, will lead to lower overall spending – again worsening the economic situation and destroying more jobs.

More miserable
The move to slash unemployment benefits is counterproductive as well as cruel; it will swell the ranks of the unemployed even as it makes their lives more miserable.

Can anything be done to reverse this policy wrong turn? The people out to punish the unemployed won’t be dissuaded by rational argument; they know what they know, and no amount of evidence will change their views.

My sense, however, is that the war on the unemployed has been making so much progress in part because it has been flying under the radar, with too many people unaware of what’s going on.

Well, now you know. And you should be angry.
– Copyright New York Times service 2013

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Screen Name Selection


Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.