Inside the world of business

'Wild west' tag reflects badly on Dublin

It would be an exaggeration to say that the Irish regulator has got a clean bill of health in the investigation in the collapse of Sachsen Landesbank by the Saxony state prosecutor.

What the state prosecutor seems to be saying is that the fault ultimately rests with the board of the bank in Leipzig because they did not know or did not care what the bank’s capital market arm in Dublin actually did and the the risks involved.

In the event it turned out that the activities that its Dublin bank was involved in – borrowing short to invest long in US asset-backed securities – was so risky that it brought the whole bank down when the credit markets froze.

If the Irish regulator was at fault it was for allowing banks such as Sachsen LB to carry out this sort of risky activity in Dublin in the first place.

This was just the another manifestation of the light touch or principle-based regulation which underlay their wider failure to rein in the domestic banks.

But in the case of Sachsen LB the damage was mitigated by the guarantees to the Irish subsidiaries by the German parent which where in effect underwritten by the German state. As a result the losses at Sachsen LB’s Irish arm – which stand at €429 million – were borne by the German tax payer.

It’s not really enough to negate the “wild west” tag that has been given to Dublin in international banking circles, much to the annoyance of the numerous well run and sober banks operating in Dublin.

It is a helpful bit of damage limitation. But in another way what is going in Germany actually highlights the failure of the Irish regime all the more.

The 556-page study into Sachsen LB commissioned by the state prosecutors is part of a case to hold the board of the banks to account for their failure to understand what the bank was doing and the risks involved.

German law is obviously different to Irish law but the Germans would appear to believe that a case can be brought against the directors.

This is is in marked contrast to Ireland where it would appear that nobody thinks that any sort of action can be brought against the directors of AIB, Bank of Ireland, Irish Life and the EBS for what they allowed to happen on their watch.

Eircom doesn't compare too badly

When it comes to Eircom things are often not what they seem, for good or ill. For example, you’d be forgiven for thinking that the company it is a complete basket case given that it’s currently trying to cut 2,000 staff from the payroll having only just emerged from examinership with reduced debts.

That doesn’t tell the full story. A comparison of latest annual reports shows that Eircom actually has the highest Ebitda margin when compared with telco giants Telefonica, BT and France Telecom.

Eircom’s Ebitda margin was a healthy 36 per cent in the year to June 2012, the year in which it emerged from examinership. This compared with a margin of 32 per cent at both Telefonica (owner of mobile operator O2) and BT, and 34 per cent at France Telecom.

Ebitda is effectively the operating profit before interest costs and other finance charges are stripped out. That’s the rub with Eircom. Its Ebitda is being eaten up by interest costs associated to its debts.

The Irish company had net debt of €2.3 billion at the end of June, which was 4.3 times its Ebitda. This is a high multiple in the current constrained financial climate.

Of the quartet, BT is best in class with a debt multiple of 1.5 times with Telefonica at 2.6 and France Telecom at 2.8.

These figures give context to the comments of Eircom’s former chief executive Paul Donovan who, before departing the company, warned that its debt pile post-examinership would still be too high.

Don't blame Canada this time

George Osborne, the UK chancellor not known for his ability to court the public, seems to have won some PR respite this week with his appointment of Mark Carney as new governor of the Bank of England.

Mr Carney’s welcome was almost universally warm, with everybody from the City of London to the shadow chancellor Ed Balls apparently as pleased as punch about the move.

Reports speak of numerous approaches to the Canadian, including personal chats with Osborne on the sidelines of a G20 meeting in Mexico at the start of last month. All of this as nobody really quite knew whether Carney, a highly successful governor of the Bank of Canada, was properly interested in the job.

It turned out, in the end, that he was, his decision-making presumably aided by the financial package Osborne was able to provide.

The new governor’s predecessor, Sir Mervyn King, earned a salary of £305,000, while Mr Carney will get £408,000, as well as a 30 per cent pension contribution. His relocation costs will be covered and he has negotiated a five-year term instead of the traditional eight.

In short, Osborne really, really, really wanted him and did everything he could to get him.

Now imagine, just for a second, a similar scenario in Ireland. Imagine if a highly important public role became vacant and an excellent candidate became available, but at a price. The extra cost might be small in the grand scale but such would be the public outcry at an elevated financial reward that an appointment would not be possible. This may be right, or it may be, on occasion at least, wrong.

Ireland is bankrupt and the UK is not – this is clear. What is also clear, however, is that really talented people often earn huge wages and attracting those really talented people into new jobs often requires even huger wages.

Revelations on elevated salaries in Irish banking have been unhelpful in this regard. They have also, more crucially, made a small mockery of the €250,000 salary cap that the Government applies to public service jobs.

Nobody wants a free-for-all on salaries, but being able to go after good people without one hand tied behind your back by a salary cap might not always be the best approach for a country, particularly one that needs strong, intelligent leadership.

The issue is not pressing but there will come a day when it is, at which point some flexibility, a la Osborne, might not be a bad thing.

Quote of the day 

'The ruling is the latest blow to Mr McKillen's strategy of using costly legal action as a delaying tactic' 

Maybourne's finance director reacts to news that the UK Supreme Court turns down Paddy McKillen's appeal



for the latest headlines

Facebook blog posts and reader polls

Sign In

Forgot Password?

Sign Up

The name that will appear beside your comments.

Have an account? Sign In

Forgot Password?

Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In or Sign Up

Thank you

You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.

Hello, .

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

Thank you for registering. Please check your email to verify your account.

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.