• RSS
  • Text Size:
  • -
  • irishtimes.com - Posted: May 4, 2010 @ 12:40 pm

    Let the Great World Spin

    Rosita Boland

    The book for May is Colum McCann’s, Let the Great World Spin, which won the prestigious  National Book Award for fiction in the US late last year.

     Colum, who now lives in New York, has agreed to answer questions about the book, so later in the month, there will be an opportunity to do that.

    So to kick off this month, here is the interview I did last August with Colum, when the book had just come out. This is the review of the book that Niall MacMonagle wrote about Let the Great World Spin for the Irish Times. This is the review that the New York Times gave the book. It’s a book “that will sneak up on you” the reviewer points out.

    Maybe to start the discussion, we can look at why you think this book has been described as a 9/11 novel? It doesn’t specifically mention that day, it’s set in 1974, not 2001. Yet it’s been hailed as a great 9/11 novel from quarters such as Esquire magazine’s description of it as ”The first great 9/11 novel.” What do you think?

    Also, tonight (Tuesday 4 May), Colum is the subject of RTE 1’s excellent Arts Lives documentaries, at 10.15pm. I am pretty sure you’ll be able to watch this back on Real Player if you can’t catch it tonight and would like to see it.

    I am away most of this month, so my colleague Fiona McCann, who has a terrific arts blog here at the IT, Pursued by a Bear, and is a features and arts journalist, will be moderating in my absence.

  • 21 Comments

    1.
    May 4, 2010
    2:18 pm

    Perfect, I just bought this yesterday, timing couldn’t be better.

    Comment by raptureponies
    2.
    May 4, 2010
    2:56 pm

    This was my bookclub book last month. Very mixed reviews. I loved it although felt the final interweaving of all the strands was a bit forced at the end. There was no need to tie them ALL together.
    Loved particularly Claire’s story. Hated the druggie. Corrigan annoyed me. Does that mean I bought into it? Go figure.
    Didn’t feel a 9/11 connection at all – don’t know how anyone could. It would detract from the stories to try and make a link. Let them stand on their own.

    Comment by Sinead Ryan
    3.
    May 4, 2010
    7:49 pm

    A wonderful choice. I’ve wanted to read it. This gives me a compelling reason to go out and get it. Gabrielle

    Comment by Gabrielle monaghan
    4.
    May 6, 2010
    10:27 am

    Raptureponies: very excited to see what you think . . .

    Sinead Ryan: I would have to agree that I too found the structure too contrivedi n the end. Claire’s story was also my favourite.

    Gabrielle: Have you started it? Do tell!

    Comment by Fiona McCann
    5.
    May 6, 2010
    1:07 pm

    I read this book a few weeks. I was quite bored by the first story, but then something clicked and I loved it.

    I loved the Philippe Petit link in the stories, and perhaps that where the 9/11 thing comes in, his presence in the book is a referece to the twin towers (stating the obvious). He was the loose link in the stories as perhaps the twin towers were in lifes of New Yorkers… always there…….

    Very good book, well written and I would reocmmend

    Enjoy !

    Comment by linda
    6.
    May 7, 2010
    10:46 am

    Linda: I like how you put it – the twin towers being such a staple element of the lives of New Yorkers, and the impact when something occurs to interfere with them in some way.

    Comment by Fiona McCann
    7.
    May 10, 2010
    7:03 pm

    Wow, I have to say with all respect that my interest in this book club is dipping off. Are we to continue on this road of middle of the road fiction? I actually read this book and found it contrived, the ending forced, the voice of the black american woman prostitute so like what a white man would think she sounded like that I had to skip over those parts. McCann can write (his prose is very polished and worthy) but I don’t feel it comes from his very raw centre, if he has one. Please, please, choose something more challanging or cutting edge next time. Or open it to suggestions. Otherwise we are just following some Ryan Tubridy kind of middle class south dublin taste in fiction. Oscar was great to go back to but lets be daring!

    Comment by jasmine
    8.
    May 10, 2010
    7:11 pm

    was trying to avoid reading this one, but I suppose I will now. Have read others of his and there is always something missing. Can’t put my finger on it. here is a review from the Guardian which I thought is interesting.

    James Buchan The Guardian, Saturday 12 September 2009 Article historyPhilippe Petit, a French street performer and high-wire artist, walked a tightrope between the unfinished World Trade Center towers in Battery Park, New York, during the morning rush hour of 7 August 1974. In a city oppressed by the oil crisis and industrial slump, the political scandal of Watergate and looming defeat in Vietnam, Petit’s courage and whimsy struck a deep chord and New York took Petit to its sentimental heart.

    Petit’s walk or “coup”, as he called it, is the metaphor or donnée of Let the Great World Spin. The meaning of the walk, as befits a metaphor, cannot be precisely counted out. It is as if all New York yearns to find a way through the air across a city that is encumbered, regulated, time-kept, pecuniary, at best indifferent and at worst a leering bully. That the Twin Towers might prove irresistible to much rougher customers than Petit and his friends on 11 September 2001, McCann leaves to a hint or two, for which we may be thankful. Let the Great World Spin is not, whatever US critics say, a “9/11 novel”.

    McCann, an Irishman now living in New York, is known for two collections of stories and a couple of novels including 2003’s Dancer, based on the exploits of another balletic exile in New York, Nureyev. Here he deploys a technique, much used in commercial fiction, in which characters are invented and manipulated to converge on a single point of space and history, such as a bank robbery or terror attack. Chief among McCann’s personnel are two Irish brothers. Ciaran flees an IRA bomb in Dublin to join his brother, Corrigan, a member of a Roman Catholic mendicant order with a mission among the whores who ply their trade under the Major Deegan Expressway in the South Bronx. Other characters include Claire Soderberg, mourning in her Park Avenue penthouse a son fallen in Vietnam, and her husband Solomon, a criminal-court judge.

    McCann has a sympathetic talent for character and a flair for the lyric. Corrigan buys one of his flock under the Deegan a Coke: “Jazzlyn clapped her hands in delight, took it from him, pulled the ring off, sauntered away. A row of eighteen-wheelers was parked along the expressway. She popped her leg on the silver grille and sipped from the can, then suddenly threw the drink on the ground and climbed up into the truck. Halfway in the door she was already removing her swimsuit. Corrigan turned away. The cola lay in a black puddle in the gutter beneath her. It happened times in a row.” But note that even in this beautiful passage, “in delight”, “suddenly” and “already” are otiose. Every Irish writer has his own private battle with blarney, the war fought out in James Joyce between “The Dead” and Ulysses

    There are wobbles, which remind the reader that McCann, too, is walking a tightrope. His history is American-sketchy. There is no hint of the principal preoccupations of the summer of 1974 in New York, which were the rise in the price of gasoline and the collapse of Wall Street. Two of his characters, downtown junkie artists, are given a 1927 Pontiac Landau, which is forever parked across the narrative. Classic cars should be avoided in fiction.

    Almost all novels are improved by cutting from the top. On their first pages, authors parade those favourite effects which disgust the impartial reader. McCann’s first chapter reads like Time magazine at its most solemn and sentimental. (“Those who saw him hushed. On Church Street. Liberty. Cortlandt. West Street. Fulton. Vesey.”) The story proper, as in so many novels, begins some way into the second chapter.

    In assembling his characters for their meeting with Petit and destiny, McCann must also relate their history up to that famous day. For all the troubled saintliness of Corrigan, or the numb fragility of Claire Soderberg, this approach, repeated 10 times, is a little monotonous. McCann describes Petit’s walk both in prose lyric and also in dialogue. Nothing in either version touched me like Petit’s flapping trousers and long hair in Jean-Louis Blondeau’s photographs from the north tower. More than anything I want to know: are flared trousers aerostatic?

    • James Buchan’s latest novel is The Gate of Air (Maclehose Press)

    Comment by aisling
    9.
    May 10, 2010
    7:13 pm

    oh and a structural suggestion, can we just have one strand to discuss the book and not have all those different strands, find them too distracting, this is much more fun to have the comments one after another, keep it simple, you can pose different questions as part of a running blog, most recent posts first as well please.
    thank you

    Comment by aisling
    10.
    May 11, 2010
    5:09 pm

    Jasmine: I have to admit, I agree with much of your assessment of the book. Still, we appear to be in the minority, which is why I thought it a good choice for this month, a possibility to open up the debate about what makes good literature.

    Aisling: Thanks for posting that excellent review. It made me seek out the YouTube I posted today, just to see what he meant about the flared trousers.

    Comment by Fiona McCann
    11.
    May 11, 2010
    5:11 pm

    Aisling: re your suggestion, do you mean not have different posts on different elements of the book? I think I get what you mean. Also, I thought it automatically updated to ensure most recent posts were first – just wondering, can you clarify?

    Comment by Fiona McCann
    12.
    May 13, 2010
    12:17 am

    God, some people are being very snotty with their remarks! Thought this was an excellent choice of book, although it is not perfect – some of the strands, especially the graffiti and the internet portions felt extraneous and tacked-on. Read it when it first came out, thought it was fantastic, very moving, and unfairly overlooked by Irish critics. Interestingly, just finished another 9/11 novel, “Falling man” which possibly appeals to snootier critics, but I just found very cold and with an utter tin ear for dialogue. Treats 9/11 like a philosophical debate rather than a violent event. McCann showed much greater insight into human condition.

    Comment by Barry
    13.
    May 14, 2010
    10:23 am

    I finished the book yesterday. I thought it was really good. He’s certainly has a knack for the oul prose.

    I often have a problem of not being able to decide if I like a book until I get to the end but I enjoyed this book as I read it, enjoying each moment for what it was rather than waiting to see how it fit into the bigger story.

    There were a couple of stories I didn’t really get or enjoy all that much. They didn’t seem to have much of a point; the photographer kid obsessed with tagging seemed a bit superfluos, and the geeks ringing the phonebox. I enjoyed the main stories and I’m glad the they didn’t overlap so much to make it contrived (like that terribly contrived movie Crash.)

    That Guardian review above is quite picky!

    What’s next? I’m a very hungry bookworm right now. Jasmine, I’d be interested in book recommendations you’d regard as cutting edge. Genuinely.

    Comment by John Braine
    14.
    May 25, 2010
    8:04 pm

    The book is about New York, and life. And in life nothing ever ends, the loose bits survive when we have passed on in friends, in relations. He’s a brilliant writer, the characters read true and the book is a stunning comment on our crazy world. Gabrielle.

    Comment by Gabrielle monaghan
    15.
    May 28, 2010
    12:14 pm

    I loved the Tag chapter. The photographer kid ended up taking the photo of Petit and the twin towers, with the plane in the background (Pg. 237) which just flies by and doesn’t hit the towers. I thought this was really clever…

    Comment by Mairead
    16.
    May 28, 2010
    12:53 pm

    So, Mairead, not sure about the whole copyright thing, but the picture credit on page 237 is, as you observantly point out, “Fernand Yunque Marcano” – the character in the chapter, “Tag”. It’s really clever, and I had to have someone point it out to me before I noticed it myself. As a journalist, though! i do wonder what the story is with copyright credits. Unless, of course, there really is someone called Fernand Yungque Marcano….

    Comment by Rosita Boland
    17.
    May 28, 2010
    1:08 pm

    Hi Rosita. In my copy of the book he does acknowledge the real photographer, Vic DeLuca in the Author’s note section. I think I heard him say in one of his interviews that Vic had given his blessing for the photograph to be used. He toyed with the idea of taking out the tag chapter as his editor didn’t get it at first, but decided to leave it in. As for the 9/11 significance, the words “A man high in the air while a plane disappears, it seems, into the edge of the building. One small scrap of history meeting a larger one. As if the walking man were somehow anticipating what would come later. The intrusion of time and history. The collision point of stories. We wait for the explosion but it never occurs. The plane passes, the tightrope walker gets to the end of the wire. Things don’t fall apart.” say it all for me.

    Comment by Mairead
    18.
    May 28, 2010
    4:07 pm

    Mairead, you are dead right. It’s at the back of the book, the acknowledgement of the true photographer. Possibly that pic is so famous anyway that everyone knows who really took it. But a lovely in-joke. I wish novels had more pics in general.

    Comment by Rosita Boland
    19.
    May 28, 2010
    5:03 pm

    That’s interesting. Having listened to the audiobook, I never got to see the photo of Petit and the Plane credited to the Tag kid.

    Comment by John Braine
    20.
    May 31, 2010
    12:50 am

    Rosita I am interested in Colum’s response to your questions on his research into the charcters in the novel
    It is a credit to him to be able to write so amazingly about lthe dark side of life in New York City and he an Irishman

    Comment by Mary Comer
    21.
    June 2, 2010
    12:23 pm

    Didn’t like Corrigan and his religious conflict, didn’t quite ring true.
    Liked Claire (although I didn’t get the part where she offers Gloria money…), her grief was well portrayed as was her husband’s private grief.
    Can’t say I really enjoyed the book, it felt too fabricated – the junkies, the graffiti kid, etc.

    Comment by Angela Helen

    Comments on this article are now closed.


Search The Book Club