• RSS
  • Text Size:
  • -
  • irishtimes.com - Posted: June 2, 2009 @ 9:11 pm

    The nazi hunters pursuit of Libertas

    Jamie Smyth

     

    As if poor poll results are not enough bad news for Libertas now they have the Simon Wiesenthal Centre on their backs.

    The Jewish human rights group, which is famous for hunting down Nazi war criminals, has written to the EU’s Fundamental Rights Agency asking for it to undertake an investigation on its links with several members of the Polish League of Familes.  

    “Libertas is running some 600 candidates in over 20 of the elections in the 27 member-states. Some of those standing are known antisemites, homophobes and anti-migrant racists,” says the centre in press release today.  

    “These include: Ryszard Bender and Anna Sobecka of the Polish League of Families. Both are supporters of the widely criticized antisemitic Radio Maryja, where Bender was recorded as stating that Auschwitz was “not a death camp but a labour camp where Jews and Gypsies were killed by hard labour – not so hard, not always killed.”

    The centre’s director for international relations Dr Shimon Samuels goes on to name several other Libertas candidates, which it accuses of holding extreme views. He also asks the electorate to use their vote wisely in this week’s election recalling that “in 1933, a potent mix of economic crisis, racism and a leadership vacuum brought Europe – and subsequently the world – to the abyss.”

    The centre addressed its strongly worded letter calling for an EU inquiry to Anastasia Crickley, the chairwoman of the Vienna-based Fundamental Rights Agency.

    I spoke to Crickley – who happens to be Irish – who told me she hadn’t received the letter yet but had been informed that something was on the way.  “This is not the type of investigation that the FRA has the remit to undertake,” she added.   

    The centre’s letter bears all the hallmarks of a public relations coup by Dr Samuels, who is already well known in
    Ireland. Remember the Hunt museum affair? Dr Samuels said the late John and Gertrude Hunt had done business with “notorious dealers in art looted by the Nazis” to stock the Limerick museum. No hard evidence was produced prompting President Mary McAleese to label the allegations as “baseless… unfounded… a tissue of lies”, which had hurt many people.

    The centre may be right that Libertas have teamed up with some unsavoury candidates in Poland but it should also be remembered that not all the claims of Dr Samuels should be accepted at face value. 

  • 13 Comments »

    1.
    June 2, 2009
    10:53 pm

    The smear-tactics against Libertas continue. The Simon Wiesenthal Centre’s credibility has been shot to pieces by their discreditted campaign against the Hunt Museum, which they accuse of links to the Nazis. 2 inquiries into this have disproved these allegations, yet they continue to make them. This is just more of the same. Vested interests are at play here.

    I used to respect the SWC when they were going after real Nazis. But when they get involved in witch-hunts with ulterior motives, you have to question what their agenda is. In respect of Ryzard Bender, his grandparents died in Auschwitz, so the claims against him are especially offensive. Another smear against Libertas revolves around a German TV presenter who joined the party. She was the victim of PC withchunt just because she called for “motherhood” to have a stronger profile in German politics and accused what she called the “68 movement” of driving the term “motherhood” out of German politics because the Nazis had distorted the concept for their own ends. As a result, she was sacked from her job. This has been portrayed in the media as her being a neo-Nazi supporting Libertas. It’s an absolute scandal what the opponents of Libertas have felt free to spread about them. No smear is too extreme for those who dared stand up to the pro-Lisbon elites and with the Irish people who voted no on a higher turnout than Lisbon II. I refused to be bullied, and will vote Libertas on Friday. Ganley’s election will rock the Establishment to its foundations, forcing them to listen to the concerns about the democratic-deficit in Europe, the loss of sovereignty, and the need for immigration-control.

    Comment by Brian Boru
    2.
    June 3, 2009
    8:04 am

    The hunt Museum affair is another matter which has been used to try and discredit the wiesenthals campaign to bring Nazis to justice and to alert the world to the rise of racism and anti semitism.During periods of economic crisis racism begins to rear its ugly head.Libertas connections with far right wing movements in the United States and the involvments of McEvaddy and Ganley on the fringes of far right european politics are known and on the public record.Poland has had a long and ambiguous history concerning its jewish population and anti semitism is deeply ingrained ,before and during the Nazi Genocide and still today.

    Comment by Olaf odin
    3.
    June 3, 2009
    10:22 am

    @Brian Boru: Of course Libertas deserves critisism when they are recruiting people who publicly says that “Auschwitz wasn’t a death camp.”

    Comment by Sigurd Jakobsen
    4.
    June 3, 2009
    11:24 am

    Can I also add that these allegations have been doing the rounds for months and when it’s dragged out of the cupboard just days before polling-day. it lends itself to charges of agenda-pushing. Olaf, if the Scandinavian countries had been given a vote on Lisbon they would have voted no aswell. Linking McEvaddy to the Far Right is nonsensical, given his friendship with Mary Harney. Ganley’s Libertas coalition across Europe includes moderates, conservatives and Liberals, and as such defies your stereotype. Evidently, Ganley is viewed by the Establishment as an electoral-threat and a threat to their cosy EU expenses in the EP – otherwise why the ‘Get Ganley’ campaign and the mad CIA conspiracy-theories? I honestly feel it’s backfiring on his critics.

    Comment by Brian Boru
    5.
    June 3, 2009
    12:59 pm

    The Simon Wiesenthal Centre are absolutely right to voice their concerns. Most WWII nazis are now dead (apart from a few juniors like the guy in the Vatican) so they must now turn their attentions to a new generation of dangerous extremists who once again threaten Europe. Many of these are already in the ranks of Libertas or, if not, have been approached by them. The xenophobic and anti-semitic comments are more pronounced in Eastern Europe than here in Ireland but the sentiments are the same. The kind of hate-speech still heard in countries like Poland and Hungary would not now be tolerated in Western Europe, though it was common 20-30 years ago. I will certainly not be voting for Ganley and all decent people should avoid his shifty and sinister alliance like the plague it is.

    Comment by NW (Galway)
    6.
    June 3, 2009
    4:57 pm

    Pure unadulterated smear.
    I will now be voting for Ganley. Thank you Jamie for making up my mind

    Comment by Sean O'Donnell
    7.
    June 3, 2009
    7:34 pm

    I normally have a lot of respect for SWC. I am extremely suspicious of this, however. It does look like politically motivated smear.
    World War 2 is OVER. Germany was defeated, bombed, occupied, partitioned, rebuilt, and politically recreated over 64 years ago. Instead of perpetually looking over our shoulders at enemies of yesterday, why aren’t we focusing on the real enemies of today? When we’re talking about antisemitism, why is it the left-wing, continually dragging up their WW2 fixations? Why aren’t we talking more about hardcore Islamic bigotry in Europe, and the left-wingers who protect them and sanction their bigotry? Why don’t we talk about German police pulling down Israeli flags from people’s apartment windows, because a pro-Hamas mob was chanting and throwing things at them? Why don’t we talk about Jews being kicked and beaten by masked left-wing “antifa” thugs in Cologne, because they were members of the Pro-Koln movement? If you want to talk about antisemitism, let’s start with the recent anti-Israel marches in Europe. Let’s talk about Socialist Dutch politicians calling for sanctions against Israel while the crowd behind them chants “Hamas Hamas, Jews to the gas!”

    Ireland voted No to Lisbon. I dislike the idea that we need to be coached and re-educated until we vote Yes. Maybe there’s something fundamentally wrong with what we’re voting for? Political dishonesty and bloated bureaucracy, perhaps?

    Comment by Steve
    8.
    June 4, 2009
    1:30 am

    The Mayo News is now giving Ganley the third seat. http://www.mayonews.ie/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=6756&Itemid=38

    Comment by Brian Boru
    9.
    June 4, 2009
    6:03 am

    Let’s look at this sort of guilt-by-association: Fianna Fail cabinet ministers attended Christian Brothers schools—the CBs ran Artane and Letterfrack industrial schools and abused countless poor boys—therefore Fianna Fail is an accomplice to systemic child abuse.

    Simon Wiesenthal was an earnest man who pursued the guilty nazi criminals to the end of his life. His successors have brought his organisation into gross disrepute.

    Comment by hoarder
    10.
    June 4, 2009
    10:52 am

    According to politics.ie, Richard Waghorne in the Mail claims that official govt budgets are being redirected to attack Ganley and Libertas http://www.politics.ie/media/74332-waghorne-im-voting-ganley-hes-got-principles-very-rare-quality-honesty.html:

    “Richard Waghorne, today’s Irish Daily Mail:

    “Hundreds of thousands of euro have been siphoned from official budgets to fund the campaign of propaganda against Libertas with journalists here being handed ‘dossiers’ detailing an absurd conspiracy theory linking him to a CIA plot without literally the lighest shred of evidence to back up the smear.”

    I hope the Irish Times will refuse to participate in such propaganda.

    Comment by Brian Boru
    11.
    June 4, 2009
    12:46 pm

    I want to bring up more information in defence of this man in Poland. The context has to be understand. In the West, when we talk of “Auschwitz”, we mean the extermination camps of Auschwitz I and particularly Auschwitz II/Birkenau which had the gas-chambers and crematoria. However in Poland, the term generally refers to a third sub-camp called Monowitz/Auschwitz III, which consisted of war-factories including those owned by the German company IG Farben which produced synthetic fuels for the German war effort. It is true that in this camp, slave-labour was exploited for the German war-effort. Abomninable and outrageous for them to do that? Of course. But it puts the alleged Bender comments in an entirely different context.And again, he lost grandparents in Auschwitz. I think it demeans the victims of that place to use their fate as a political-football.

    Comment by Brian Boru
    12.
    June 4, 2009
    3:13 pm

    Having met Simon Wiesenthal and Rabbi Heir on numerous occasions it turns my stomach that some people would try to tarnish their names and the work that they have done.

    The work done by all those at the Simon Wiesenthal Centre in numerous locations around the world is awe inspiring.

    Comment by Sally
    13.
    June 5, 2009
    1:15 am

    Sally I think SW would turn in his grave to see how his successors have brought the organisation into disrepute.

    Comment by Brian Boru

    Leave a comment

    When submitted, your comment will be moderated and, once approved, will appear on the site.

    The Irish Times reserves the absolute right not to publish comments.


Search State of the Union