Donald Clarke

Whingeing about cinema and real life since 2009

50 years, 50 films: The Battle of Algiers (1966)

The latest film in our countdown from 1963 is a classic study of political conflict

Mon, Aug 5, 2013, 23:00


It hardly needs to be said that there was a lot of politics about in the 1960s. All decent folks knew where they stood with Martin Luther King or with Cesar Chavez. But the rise in political violence left a great many cosy liberals in an uncomfortable position. Which brings us to Gillo Pontecorvo’s incomparable, indecently exciting The Battle of Algiers. It is weird to recall that the film occasionally found itself classified as a documentary. You feel few punters would be quite so easily confused now. The picture is quite obviously a rigorous, dramatised study of the Algerian revolt against colonial French rule in the mid-1950s. There is certainly a stink of verité about the piece. Marcello Gatti’s camera jostles its way through the casbah in convincing, unfettered style. But there is great artifice on display too. Ennio Morricone’s score exhibits the same angular oddness that characterised his work on contemporaneous Sergio Leone pictures. The scene in which a bomb is placed in a milk bar buzzes with carefully sustained tension. It’s a brilliant work of high-end fakery.

YouTube Preview Image

Okay. But what is the film trying to say? Is The Battle of Algiers in favour of what we now call terrorism? Opponents of Kathryn Bigelow’s Zero Dark Thirty may view any comparison with Battle of Algiers as a kind of sacrilege, but both pictures do investigate the same uneasy questions about political violence (in the later film’s case, state-sponsered violence). If we are being asked to side with the movie’s principal characters — and that is certainly the case in Battle — then are we necessarily being asked to approve all of their methods? Probably not. Nonetheless, Battle of Algiers does put the pacifist in a very tricky position. Watching the torture being carried out  by the French, observing the sly cunning of the revolutionaries, it is very hard not to cheer when they achieve one of their brutal coups.

You could see Battle of Algiers as The Wind that Shakes the Barley without that film’s exasperated, regretful second half. Ken Loach and Paul Laverty see the socialist revolution  as being betrayed by religion and capitalism. Quite a lot of that has been going on in North Africa over the last few years.

For the record, other films considered for 1966 included The Good the Bad and the Ugly, Persona and Au Hazard Balthasar,

Sign In

Forgot Password?

Sign Up

The name that will appear beside your comments.

Have an account? Sign In

Forgot Password?

Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In or Sign Up

Thank you

You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.

Hello, .

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

Thank you for registering. Please check your email for the activation code.

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 10 days from the date of publication.