The strange story of the Jack and Jill press show.
Donald Clarke
Here’s an odd one. Every now and then, some distributor will fail to screen a film for the press in this territory. More often than not the movie will be shown to our cousins across the Irish Sea. A good example is the recent Liam Neeson thriller The Grey. It is not unreasonable for readers to assume that the film in question must stink like last week’s socks. They’re usually right. But, quite often, the reason is pure meanness. The Grey, for example, has actually got fairly decent reviews. What a nuisance!
But not for viewers in the UK.
In over a decade at this job I cannot remember an instance where a mainstream film was screened for the Irish critics, but not for their UK colleagues. Until now. Look about the British papers this week and you will find no notices for Jack and Jill, Adam Sandler’s latest atrocity. Yet the fine people at Sony Ireland (good for you, folks) unspooled the picture for your current correspondent and his fellow hacks. I really wanted to reward their professionalism by giving Jack and Jill a good review. But, well, it’s a film in which Adam Sandler plays an annoying man and his more annoying sister. It would have been an appalling dereliction of duty to lead you astray.
What’s up? Well, it is worth noting (and regretting) that Mr Sandler’s pictures do significantly better on the island of Ireland — they particularly love them in Larne and Lisburn, incidentally — than they do in what Peter Robinson calls the mainland. Even though the reviews were bound to be awful, it may have been deemed worth the risk to make sure Irish Sandlerphiles were aware he was doing his awful thing in the nation’s blameless cinemas.
Different rules apply in different territories. Note, for instance, that studios very often fail to screen horror films for American critics, but show them to Europeans. This surely stems from an interesting distinction between the reviewers on either side of the Atlantic. American pundits have never taken horror seriously. We are — in that regard at least — a bit more open minded.
Obviously, domestic readers will be furious that they are left unable to peruse fascinating reviews in their soaraway Ticket. But does the lack of screenings have any effect on box-office returns? Not at first. But, as Tara Brady pointed out in a recent Rotten Potatoes column, such films do tend to flag after a few weeks. You watch. Jack and Jill will do much better here than it does in the UK. Oh, hang on. That would have happened anyway. We’re bleeding idiots in that regard.


The marketing for “The Grey” seems to be a bit weird – probably due to pennypinching. I’ve been to the cinema at least a dozen times in the last month or so, and I haven’t seen a single trailer for it. On the other hand, every single movie I’ve seen has had an advert for “The Muppets” beforehand. Including “Shame” and “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”.
But are we more likely to invite the chap over for our various film festivities?
The Wickerman springs to mind!
I can’t help but wonder if even that flagging income over the following few weeks is down to word of mouth (or twitter) rather than the lack of critical reviews.
Part of me would like to see a very good movie released without press screenings, just so we compare what happens. I’d wager dollars to donuts it wouldn’t flag after a few weeks. David Fincher notoriously dispises press screenings, so maybe his next film would be an ideal candidate.
I live in the United States and during the summer in the big multiplex downtown they have these trailer booths where they individually show you trailers and ask your opinion – all in an attempt to fine tune the trailer before widespread release, one assumes.
You watch the trailer and are asked about 20-30 multiple choice questions on what you’ve watched, all in the cause of ‘helping Hollywood’
Was it too fast? Did you recognise the lead? Was there enough action? That sort of thing.
Last summer I saw the first horrific trailer for Jack & Jill.
The interesting thing was that among the multiple choice answers was “Don’t like Adam Sandler” “I hate movies where a man plays a woman” “The female character is too annoying”
In other words, they have long known they have a dog on their hands and exactly why the film was so horrible – its premise and its lead.
The last question always is “Will you be telling your friends about this movie?”
To which I answered “Yes, to let them know how awful it is”
True story.