• RSS
  • Text Size:
  • -
  • irishtimes.com - Posted: January 24, 2012 @ 10:26 pm

    Screenwriter’s shamefully poor Oscar nap.

    Donald Clarke

    Well, it wasn’t a complete disgrace. Screenwriter, at least, managed to have all the front runners in place. But, in two areas at least, I received a fairly serious drubbing. Your correspondent felt that both Tomas Aflredson’s Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy and Stephen Daldry’s Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close would (and not just because their titles were too long) figure absolutely nowhere. As it happened, both secured significant nods. Gary Oldman finally gets his best actor nomination for TTSS. Max Von Sydow is in the best supporting frame for ELAIC and that Daldry film is up for best picture.

    There are four of them, and Smiley.

    Come to think of it, as Dan Ashcroft noted beneath the last post, these Oscars have kicked up more surprises than any recent edition — which just goes to show how predictable they usually are. Virtually nobody felt that Extremely Loud had a serious chance of a best picture nomination. Earlier tonight, on BBC Radio Four, Mark Lawson suggested to Daldry that this was the worst-reviewed film ever to secure a best picture mention. (Daldry took it quite well.) Yet there it sits. Demian Bichir did receive a nod at the Screen Actors Guild for his fine turn in the (to my mind) useless A Better Life. So we can’t say his nomination was the greatest upset of all time. But I would never have felt he’d take the place marked for Michael Fassbender. It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that this result shows the Academy at its most wishy-washy. The bloke in the film about the hard-working Mexican immigrant (a travesty of Bicycle Thieves, incidentally) beats out the guy in the sordid (if moral) film about an unstoppable shagging machine. I haven’t seen Extremely Loud yet. I will, nonetheless, point out that the 9/11 story beat the racy Drive and the lubricious Bridesmaids to the presumed last spot on the grid. Draw your own conclusion.

    What else has gone unnoticed? Well, the most notoriously stupid category — that for best foreign language picture — did manage to hang on to Asghar Farhadi’s fine A Separation. There is still every chance it could lose. If it does so to the excellent Footnotes then I will just about live with it. A victory by any other film will cause my eyebrows to raise.

    Having already won quite a few awards for his supporting turn in Drive, Albert Brooks looked even more of a shoo-in than did Michael Fassbender. It is, however, hard to get too upset about Max Von Sydow sneaking in ahead of him. What a pleasure to have two great octogenarians — Christopher Plummer remains strong favourite — in the best supporting actor competition. Hats off to movie royalty. You have both helped movie-goers’ lives seem worthwhile over the last 50 years or so.

    Great, an excuse to post a photo of my heroes.

    Mark, also, an interesting exclusion in the best feature animation race. For the first time since its inception, the relevent year’s Pixar film has failed to make it into the enclosure. When you consider that this was a particularly weak year for that genre this result seems all the more notable. What in the name of Tex Avery was John Lassetter thinking of with Cars 2? The first film wasn’t great. But the second was a roaring disgrace. For the last decade and a half we have been praising Pixar for working hard on their scripts and not slipping into lazy talking-animal (or, in this case, automobile) cliches. The relatively poor box office for that film and its shameful performance at the Oscars will, we hope, give the people at that great animation studio pause for thought. Advance word is good for their upcoming Brave. Don’t let us down, boys and girls.

    It’s also worth pondering the decline of the “original song” category. Just two tunes turned up in that race: Man or Muppet from, erm The Muppets and Real in Rio from, erm, Rio. I like the Muppet tune. But nobody is likely to mistake it for Somewhere Over the Rainbow or As Time Goes By. Where have you gone, fair songwriters? Come back to the fold.

    In so far as we give a damn, the list did offer quite a bit of food for thought. And we haven’t even mentioned that 40 percent of the nominees for best live-action short were Irish. We’re almost as good at that discipline as  we used to be at the Eurovision Song Contest.

  • 30 Comments »

    1.
    January 24, 2012
    11:30 pm

    Did anybody think that Bruce Greenwood in “Meek’s cutoff” deserved a nomination for Best Supporting Actor? Or Paul Giamatti for “Barney’s Version” for best Actor?

    Comment by Twilight
    2.
    January 24, 2012
    11:35 pm

    Also why wasn’t Wilson’s “As If I Am Not There” nominated for Best Foreign Film?

    Comment by Twilight
    3.
    January 25, 2012
    8:43 am

    @1: Deserve’s got nothin’ to do with it. Alas.

    But I did call Extremely Loud. Too much cloying Oscar bait in one sitting for the Academy to refuse.

    Comment by Darren
    4.
    January 25, 2012
    12:42 pm

    re the Original song category, it seems fairly baffling to only have 2 songs,
    worst thing that might have happened with 5 noms is a few more stars turning up at the show

    Comment by OC
    5.
    January 25, 2012
    12:48 pm

    It makes a little more sense now:
    Unlike other categories, song nominees are determined by voting members of the music branch who watch sections of films where songs are played and nothing else. Since instituted, it has resulted in performance clips and animated songs being nominated but no end credit or background songs.

    Voters assign each song a numerical score between 1 and 10, and if no song receives an average of less than 8.25, there are no nominees. If only one song tops the threshold, as clearly happened here, the next highest vote getter secures a nomination as well.

    Comment by OC
    6.
    January 25, 2012
    3:22 pm

    See I called it right with my 6 stars for Gary Oldman there lately. That’s 100% hit rate for me anyway Mr Clarke. Move over there sir. These cinema seats are very tight ain’t they? Or could it be my neophyte movi sorry FILM critic’s arse is expanding into the job already then?

    Comment by John O'Driscoll
    7.
    January 25, 2012
    5:58 pm

    bet they’ve already trained Uggie to walk up the red carpet on his hind legs…and to accept the Oscar for The Artist….

    Ryan Gosling has to be miffed……especially since Albert Brooks is getting more attention than he is….and apparently Mr Gosling wasn’t too happy at first about Mr Brooks playing the part of Bernie Rose…

    Comment by MssssssS
    8.
    January 25, 2012
    6:50 pm

    On the animated feature race, I should also have mentioned the non-appearence of Tintin. I had assumed that — after much wrangling — the picture had been deemed ineligible. But this does not seem to have been the case. Though I didn’t much care for the thing, this remains a surprising omission. Then again, that category is voted for by animation professionals and they may (understandably enough) not have cared for the whole motion-capture malarkey.

    Comment by Donald Clarke
    9.
    January 25, 2012
    9:32 pm

    I really thought “Winnie the Pooh” would get a nomination in the animated feature category – not as good as the Golden Age favourites of 2D animation but a damn fine film.

    Comment by Noel
    10.
    January 26, 2012
    7:29 am

    Wait until you get a load of ‘Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close’. You’ll understand why I spat my tea out all over the TV screen watching the nominations the other day.

    Comment by Declan
    11.
    January 26, 2012
    10:50 am

    Spielberg should’ve remade “The Adventures of Rin-tin-tin” instead (see link), as the simplicity of it would appeal to a general US audience…and he should’ve just left Hergé’s Tintin for the sophisticated European Tintinologists…….and save the ‘motion capture malarkey’ for another ExtraTerrestrial-type extravaganza.

    (triv.ia…Tintin’s dog Snowy/Milou is a White Wire Fox Terrier………have to say they’re a lot cuter than the Jack Russell Terrier, which breed Uggie is)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnxjsCXThKU

    Comment by Bianca casta
    12.
    January 26, 2012
    2:34 pm

    TTSS…….(Tinker,Tailor, Soldier, Spy)………….sorry…..wasn’t going to mention it……..line five S/writer’s main post has TTTS……..

    Comment by proofreader
    13.
    January 26, 2012
    4:04 pm

    I like terriers. I’ve a little Yorkie named Charley. She’s brave as any dog could be. Last week two big Alsations were frolicking about on the green outisde our house and Charley was yelling at them from behind the safety of the glass. Bouncing up and down on her paws in outrage that such lunking monsters would ever DARE to defile ”Her” property (which from what I can tell appears to be most of Kildare). So I brought her out to say hello thinking to meself ”She’s just another internet warrior all brave and tough while hidden behind a screen but pull her out into the real world and introduce her using her real name let’s see how quiet she gets”. Sure enough, when I put her down on the ground not far from the two monster German Shepherds who wouldn’t look out of place in any Tarantino film dealing with the subject of killing Nazis she did drop her ears slightly and give a little whine of fear in the back of her throat. But a couple seconds later when one of them ambled over to have a nosey at this little scrap of caninity she stiffened in outrage and let out a snarl so deep and ferocious that the Alsation backed off hurriedly and became suddenly interested in a leaf blowing along the road. Ain’t the size of the dog in the fight &c. Was very proud of her. ”Terrier” comes from the French ”terre” which of course means ground and Yorkies were originally bred not as decorative toy dogs but for the unenviable job of keeping rats down in mines. Must say I was very proud of her.

    Comment by JO@D
    14.
    January 26, 2012
    4:07 pm

    (Well feckit don’t blame me I’ve shag all to say about the Oscars being as I didn’t watch them nor’ve I seen half the films you mention nor even a quarter as yet. Altho’ the good lady did observe to me reading @ 6 above last nite that I was a bit harsh on you Mr Clarke I replied ”Not at all they know I’m only slagging there’s only one film critic I do read and that’s Donald Clarke and he hasn’t yet put me wrong on anything he’s recommended that I’ve watched.” So no offence btw. It’s just my hyper-graphia and I’m really very fond of dogs and like reading and writing about them. Far more honest and decent than most humans I’ve met imo)

    Comment by JO@D
    15.
    January 26, 2012
    4:16 pm

    Terriers are not real dogs.

    Comment by dinkydo
    16.
    January 26, 2012
    5:21 pm

    @15 well they coulda fooled me. Four legs. Wet nose. Hairy. Sharp fangs. Honest. What more do you want?

    Comment by JO@D
    17.
    January 26, 2012
    6:14 pm

    Hmmmmm……..didn’t realize the original Rin-Tin-Tin was a Silent Movie star (eat your heart out Uggie)
    What are the odds a whole heap of the next batch of Oscar hopefuls will go all black & white silent and/or barking mad with canine actors………..trend setter terrier that Uggie..

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rS1jxxEH9JM&feature=related

    Comment by MssssS
    18.
    January 26, 2012
    10:39 pm

    (Em. I@m morto. My good lady was reading this blog tonite and started splutterin with laughter ‘I’m not that funny’ I said and she said ‘No. Yer an eegit. The Oscars aren’t til NEXT month it’s the NOMINATIONS this month hahhaha ‘O look at me I don’t watch much teevee I didn’t watch the Oscars heeheeehee’ and so forth. Janey. You can have yer film critic’s sate back Mr Clarke. How embarrassing. Far as I’m concerned oscars are things I can put in my fish tank (Astronotus ocellatus) and auric orbs or golden balls or whatever well I’ll not be crude. Feck I’m SCARLEH.)

    Comment by JO@D
    19.
    January 26, 2012
    10:44 pm

    (She did laugh at my telling of the bravery of Charley tho’. I went and looked up this Uggie yizzer all talking about. See what I mean? Terriers. They’re afraid of NOTHING. Loved the BAFTA’s reasons for denying him eligibility fr their awards. ‘He’s not a human being and his motivation as an actor is sausages”. Liked the Rin-tin-tin clips altho’ as someone remarks German Shepherds these days are different. I’ll say they are they’re feckin much huger for a start. Gas the way that little crippled boy shot up the cliff like a stabbed rat when he was being chased by them wolves they didn’t shoot that scene at Lourdes did they?)

    Comment by JO@D
    20.
    January 26, 2012
    10:47 pm

    Btw proofreader while yer at it ”the relevent year’s Pixar film” is spelled ”the relevant year’s Pixar film..”
    And yeah I know Alsations is spelt Alsations.
    Even the just man falleth 7x per diem.

    Comment by JO@D
    21.
    January 27, 2012
    8:22 am

    “Great, an excuse to post a photo of my heroes.”

    Didn’t realize Screenwriter was a fan of the current coalition……….Muppets..!
    Don’t know what Enda (blue suit) is so happy about………..Lucinda Creighton red polka dots…….nice…
    Is that Eamon Gilmore (Kermit) in the green jersey behind them………..Mick Wallace could you point out Ms Piggy…..Beaker…Brian Hayes…

    Comment by M$$$$$
    22.
    January 27, 2012
    1:04 pm

    Lord, Donald you are fond of the phrase “middlebrow”! Every week you use it in some context. I enjoy your reviews, particularly the bad ones but that phrase gets up my nose a tad.

    On the Oscar nominations, disappointed to see Michael Shannon not get recognition for Take Shelter, really strong performance

    Comment by John
    23.
    January 27, 2012
    1:09 pm

    The biggest surprise of all for me was Chico & Rita getting a best animation nod. As far as I’m concerned this is the first time a child-excluding film has been nominated in that category. Sure, The Illusionist and Persepolis are not traditional children’s fare, but I don’t think the average parent would have much trouble showing a child them. C&R, actually very sweet and light, does have brief moments of nudity and eroticism that, certainly in the US if not here, would cause most parents to raise eyebrows. Back in 2007 (I think, too lazy to look up), Waltz With Bashir was nominated for best foreign language film, but didn’t feature on the animation list, and I had always assumed this was due to its violent content.

    Meanwhile, Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close has a 49% on Rotten Tomatoes, which has to be a recent low for a best picture nominee. The trailer looks so manipulative it might as well have the planes crashing into Shawshank Prison while George VI is giving a speech instead of the WTC.

    Anyhow, as long as Man or Muppet (though I do prefer Life’s a Happy Song) and The Artist win on the night, I’ll be happy.

    Comment by David Neary
    24.
    January 27, 2012
    1:13 pm

    Fair point, John. I will beware. These things can creep up on you without you noticing.

    Comment by Donald Clarke
    25.
    January 28, 2012
    2:34 am

    No Movie Quiz this week, Mr Clarke? How can I be expected to begin my weekend without it?!

    Comment by ajmg
    26.
    January 28, 2012
    11:36 am

    There’s a quiz all right. I wasn’t aware it was not online. Will check up on that.

    Comment by Donald Clarke
    27.
    January 29, 2012
    10:25 am

    Pixar’s upcoming “Brave”……….talk about stereotypes……….and at a time when Scottish independence is on the agenda……and the rest of Europe is heading towards unification……….maybe going backwards is the answer……..

    I am so delighted “Men Who Hate Women” (aka The Gurl with the Dragon Tatt) didn’t get a look-in…….

    Comment by Haggis McDuff
    28.
    January 31, 2012
    1:22 pm

    Ah good glad you didn’t print that last because it was Ch’uang Tzu not Mushashi who spoke of the Man of Tao as being someone who doesn’t go round shouting about how great he is or being a show-off or anything. But other than that I still reckon ”The Driver” is a very good reprise of Yojimbo/The Man With No Name except of course his weapon isn’t a Colt Navy nor a katana but his own driving skills and the cars he uses them in. Should be made mandatory watching for all young fellas with right feet made of lead and who think being a good driver is all about taking unnecessary risks and showing off. Being a good driver is getting your passengers from A to Z regardless of what happens what challenges dangers hazards etc might occur but getting them there in such a way that they barely remember the journey so peaceful smooth and uneventful it should appear.

    Comment by John O'Driscoll
    29.
    January 31, 2012
    2:06 pm

    Sorry. Meant ”Drive” not ”The Driver”. That was a much different film. In some ways. Anyway very good very much enjoyed it. Obviously being set in the US it had certain limitations as a true driver’s movie (I drove the same Mustang he drives/steals. Bout two years ago drove her from Santa Clara down to Monterrey and over to Carmel to Mr Eastwood’s Mission Ranch for a drink and a bite to eat and hoping to see the great man were he to drop by to play a few songs on the piano but sadly he wasn’t around that night. Beautiful car the Mustang though. 5 litres as I recall and 32 valves. Loads of oomph (nasty placky interior tho’ imeuropeano) but obviously not as much oomph as she’d have had had she a manual ‘box. Which is the limitation I mean in ”Drive”. They’re all automatics. Love to see a version made European. With manual boxes. And with a woman central character. None of the obvious jokes please remember Rosemary Smith. Some of them can drive most men off the road and with a stick too. Other than that small criticism really liked the flm. Loved the way that, like a samurai or Clint’s character in those spaghetti westerns everything he does is with a definiteness, surety, certainty, indefatagibility (sp?), be it the precision of his driving or the way he stamps that hitman to death in the elevator. No room allowed for doubt, because in driving, doubt, hesitancy, can get you killed and more importantly others killed too.

    Comment by John O'Driscoll
    30.
    February 1, 2012
    4:54 pm

    Actually she’d have been the 24 valve Modular VCT throwing out 315 horses in the 2010 Mustang I drove. Sorry. Correction for accuracy. Watched ‘Drive’ again last night just to get all the nuances (never think it fair to review a film til I’ve seen it twice anyway). Story’s old as King Arthur and his knights really. I mean the blond lady the Driver falls in love with is Guinevere, their love is courtly, chaste, and pure. The Driver himself is a knight. He’s even got the shining armour in the form of his silver racing jacket (mailed effect and all in the quilted stitching) and his blazon is that stylised scorpion device. His gauntlets are his backless driving gloves, which I notice he tends to pull on not just when he drives but when he carries out any violence. Of course this verray parfit gentil knicthe ‘rides’ a Mustang. How chevalier. The scene where he kisses his lady love in the lift, just before he stamps the hitman to death in the same lift, is like something out of a Grail legend, with the use of filters/reduced exposure and the lamp on the wall of the lift creating a scene almost churchlike in appearance. One might almost imagine the Sangreal floating towards him as it did towards Percival wasn’t it? Of course he’s a sociopath, capable of extreme cool in the midst of extreme danger, as one might reasonably assume any crusading ‘knight of Christ’ might have been (and as most Special Forces members are today). He even recognises this in himself when he asks the little boy ”Are there no good sharks?”. He knows what he is, and what redeems him is he can recognise goodness and purity in a naughty world and can take a stand to defend and protect it. He is, in effect, a perfect killing/driving machine, capable of turning off his emotions at will in order to deal with threats and dangers. But a good one. As was the likes of Sir Launcelot. I don’t know. I found it a most hopeful film but maybe that was excessive character identification or something. Must buy a copy hope it gets a Golden Ball or statue whatever. Doesn’t matter if it doesn’t who needs baubles and geegaws once one knows one has done a good job.

    Comment by John O'Driscoll

    Leave a comment

    When submitted, your comment will be moderated and, once approved, will appear on the site.

    The Irish Times reserves the absolute right not to publish comments.


Search Screenwriter