• RSS
  • Text Size:
  • -
  • irishtimes.com - Posted: January 4, 2011 @ 8:48 pm

    True Grit and the disappearing Western

    Donald Clarke

    YouTube Preview Image

    Here’s an interesting statistic. With a take of around $25 million, the Coen Brothers’ True Grit has just secured the biggest US opening weekend for a proper Western in cinema history. (If you allow in Wild Wild West, which is more of an atrocity than an oater, then it still occupies the number two spot.) Two and a  half truths are hidden within these numbers. Firstly, it’s been an awfully long time since westerns figured at the box-office. Secondly, release patterns have changed significantly since those days. Second and a halfly, though the western was once among the key genres, individual westerns rarely made a great deal of money.

    Let’s treat these in reverse order. Though cheap serial westerns did very well and the odd star-heavy oater hoovered up the bucks, the genre never really delivered Event Pictures that appealed across the demographics. We have proof. The golden era for the western was surely the 1940s. Have a glance at the top ten for that decade:

    1.Bambi (1942)

    2. Pinocchio (1940)

    3. Song of the South (1946)

    4. Samson and Delilah (1949)

    5. Fantasia (1940)

    6. The Best Years of Our Lives (1946)

    7. The Bells of St. Mary’s (1945)

    8. Duel in the Sun (1946)

    9. This Is the Army (1943)

    10. The Jolson Story (1946)

    What (apart from the extraordinary power of Walt Disney) do you notice? There is only one western in the list and that film — Duel in the Sun – is something of a special case. Labelled Lust in the Dust by disapproving tabloids, the picture was a notoriously steamy shocker. No wonder it appealed beyond the core audience.

    As regards release patterns, when the western was in its prime, movies were released on a steady rollout. Half a dozen screens would take the picture in the first week. If it worked you’d expand by another 20 or so. The blanket opening weekend, drawing figures from thousands of screens across the country (and, often these days, the world), did not become commonplace until Jaws ate America in1975.

    Then, of course, we have the strange decline in the western. Whose fault was that? Mine, that’s who. Sorry, not just mine. I should say “ours”. The generation born in the early 1960s became the first kids to reject the western as a mainstream entertainment. It was, for our lot, a strange situation. We were still given cowboy guns for our birthdays. Series such as The Virginian and The High Chaparral were still on TV. But cowboys and indians rarely excited us. In my recollection, the only western I was taken to see in the cinema as a boy was the jokey, anachronistic Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. War films were regarded as far more exciting. Older uncles would hop up and down when a John Ford film came on the telly, but, to us, the stories seemed slow, decrepit and rather musty. As a result, for movie nuts of my generation, the western became something of a mature pleasure. Rather than growing up watching Ford, one came to him later — just as one came later to Bergman, Tarkovsky and Antonioni (pardon my pretensions).

    At any rate, the news is happy intelligence for Coen fans and belated western enthusiasts. Sadly, we’ll have to wait a while to assess the thing. The release has been kicked back to February 11th.

    • BenCampbell says:

      But the delayed release will give those who have not read it plenty of time to get hold of the Charles Portis novel. It’s Terrific!

    • dealga says:

      Did little Donnie Clarke not help Blazing Saddles (a classic of the genre) hit second spot in 1974?

      Anyway who needs True Grit when we have Red Dead Redemption

    • CPL593H says:

      Every time a western is released the same articles appear about the decline and return of said genre. But if you look closely, there have been plenty of good, moderately successful Westerns over the last number of years: Open Range, 3.10 To Yuma, The Claim, The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada, Brokeback Mountain, The Assassination of Jesse James (my favourite film of 2007), Appaloosa, The Proposition, Seraphim Falls and stretching the definition a little bit There Will Be Blood, The Good The Bad And The Weird, No Country For Old Men etc.

      I’d argue that the Western has always held an appeal to cinemagoers. Otherwise why are so many still being made?

    • JayBee says:

      Donald, you obviously lost out on going to see The Outlaw Josey Wales which I remember going to see when I was about 12. I think it was somebody’s birthday. Clint practically kept the genre alive and even he didn’t make another one until he did Pale Rider.

      It’s probably a bit simplistic to blame us, the audience, The money men stopped wanting to make them and the filmmakers wanted to stop making them as well. Many of the great westerns from the 1950s on were “metaphorical westerns” used to explore other themes and as the business changed at the end of the 60s and 70s the movie brats found different ways to do that. After all Star Wars borrows heavily from the western.

    • J Burke says:

      It was great! I’m not a huge John Wayne fan so I didn’t have any John Wayne bone to pick – I just enjoyed the movie. Jeff Bridges is always good as are the Coen brothers.

    • @CPL593H and JayBee

      I accept the argument that some fine westerns that have turned up over the last decade or so, but I can’t pass by the phrase “so many still being made” without comment. In comparison with any year before, say, 1960 the number of westerns being made now is positively minute. Moreover, of the films CP mentioned, only three — Brokeback Mountain, No Country For Old Men and 3.10 to Yuma — made a penny (and only the last of those is a true western). Most of the rest were all genuine financial catastrophes. That I would argue is why the “money men” all but stopped making them. Nobody goes to see the blasted things.

      Have a glance at this URL for a chilling example:

      http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=jessejames.htm

      Despite starring Brad Pitt, Jess James took less than $4 million in the US. Four million!

      JayBee is, of course, right that the (pseud alert) tropes do keep turning up in other genres.

    • CPL593H says:

      Wow! only 4 million in the US (interestingly 11 million foreign). I take the point about most of the westerns being financial flops but even still they keep coming out, albeit in far fewer numbers than before. Is that through sheer will of directors/producers/stars? Did Open Range come out because Kevin Costner was determined to make it? Most of the examples I have quoted feature ageing actors (Pierce Brosnan, Tommy Lee Jones, Robert Duval, Ed Harris). Are these modern westerns just nostalgic vanity projects that somehow get the green light?

      I hope they keep coming. I still love to see a Western on the big screen.

    • David says:

      Donald is the release date postponement for major films like True Grit not nothing short of madness?? I’m a huge Coen brothers fan and had been dying to see this film for months, then last week it became available on the torrent downloads. Studios complain about piracy, but how are you expected to wait an additional month to pay to see something in the cinema when you can just download a DVD quality version of the film and watch it on the big screen at home replete with surround sound?!

      This happens every year; 5,000 DVD’s of the Oscar contenders are sent to the academy to review and they inevitably end up on the internet. And all easily avoided by simply having global releases rather than regional ones. Film piracy will not go away, Pandora’s box has been opened on that one and the nerds will always be a few steps ahead of the execs, but the studios can minimise the impact through a bit of common sense.

    • I can add nothing to what you say, David. Though, of course, we should remind readers that downloading such films is a very serious crime.

    • PaulC says:

      re: 8
      A simultaneous global release costs more money.
      that is all.

    • David says:

      @PaulC
      I think it’s a bit naive to believe that cost of a global release is greater than the amount of money lost through illegal downloading. Certainly the studios would have us believe that they’re losing millions per film. Plus I know that global releases were expensive when the films were distributed on celluloid, but as it’s all digital distribution now I can’t believe that global releases cost significantly more than staggered regional ones.

    • Ted says:

      The cowboy and injun film died with Soldier Blue and didn’t really get a leg-up until Dances With Wolves came along. In the interim there was Grizzly Adams and our own Mr Harris’s Man Called Horse franchise, which I think is the thin end of a large wedge of ‘exploitation’ westerns. I’d count The Last of the Mohicans as a western, and a good one at that. But then there are many films that are ‘westerns’ (Outland, The Field etc) but ain’t sold as such.

    • Rob says:

      Can’t believe nobody has mentioned “Unforgiven”. What a brilliant film, stands on its own both as a western and as a great film, with a superb cast!


Search Screenwriter