• RSS
  • Text Size:
  • -
  • irishtimes.com - Posted: December 18, 2009 @ 11:53 pm

    Trailerspotting goes down the rabbit hole in search of Irish films.

    Donald Clarke

    What’s the most eagerly awaited film of 2010? There’s a stupid question. If you’re a big fan of the excellent Jennifer Lopez and her many splendid romantic comedies then you will, no doubt, be slavering for The Back-Up Plan. If, on the other hand, you have long admired the way Hollywood treats Irish mores and habits — you know, the way it never patronises us — then you may have high hopes for the promising Leap Year. If you like to watch Robin Williams in light-hearted, quasi improvised lad-coms then… What the hell is wrong with you? You should bloody see somebody about that.

    Where was I? Oh, yes. I reckon the mainstream film that most people circling this “blog” are interested in just might be Tim Burton’s upcoming adaptation of Alice in Wonderland.

    YouTube Preview Image

    Now, at the risk of bringing down the wrath of cinephiles everywhere, let me just tentatively note that I have never been entirely sure about Tim Burton. His films do look quite nice — particularly if you’re a sulky goth — and he does have great taste in actors: Michael Gough, Christopher Lee, Christopher Walken and, of course, Johnny Depp. But his work too often lacks a centre. You know what I mean. Mars Attacks! is funny, but the story flails around so much you end up feeling quite dizzy by the end. Sleepy Hollow is set design in search of a story. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was so shallow it could have stood as a work of conceptual art. For me, the best Burton films are the least fussy: Edward Scissorhands, Beetlejuice, Pee-wee’s Big Adventure and — the one film of his I think a genuine gem — Ed Wood.

    So what do we make of Alice? Well, not that it matters, you wouldn’t say it looks very true to the original. The Lewis Carroll version managed to be unhinged while still remaining sober. (Carroll was a mathematician after all.) The Burton adaptation appears to be tending towards the screamingly camp: Alice reimagined by H R Pufnstuf’s fabulous younger brother. Also, the trailer suggests that the writers have worked a little too hard at expanding and fluffing up the original story. Another Where the Wild Things Are would be bearable. Another Popeye would not.On the upside, Depp has finally managed to win his long, backwards and forwards conflict with the English accent. The cat looks cool and Tweedledum and Tweedledee seem properly scary. I’m still not quite sure.

    On an unrelated note, you may like to ponder my consideration of the best Irish films of the decade in today’s Ticket. The good news is that the debate is now one that’s really worth having. My final five were Hunger, Adam & Paul, Once, Intermission and Pavee Lackeen.

  • 18 Comments »

    1.
    December 19, 2009
    7:35 am

    Isn’t it time Burton fell in love with another actor? His perpetual casting of Depp is getting tired. Or perhaps Depp in white make up is getting to be tired… no doubt Mz Bonham-Carter-Burton is in there too.

    Comment by Teddy
    2.
    December 19, 2009
    11:08 am

    Garage and In Bruge shouldve been in there ahead of once in my very humble opinion Donald. finally willed myself to watch hunger the other night, it is superb, a deserving winner. And as for Alice in Wonderland, its no Leap Year, just look at how the Americans have accepted that the Irish are no longer typical stereotypes of drunks in pubs wearing thick jumpers, carrying a pig under their arms and spouting light bigotry while snow patrol plays in the backgroud.

    Comment by bateman
    3.
    December 19, 2009
    12:52 pm

    Ah well Bateman. Now we (already?) get into the tricky business of what constitutes an Irish film. I was involved in a critics’ poll last year on Irish film and a substantial minority of my colleagues felt Hunger was not a domestic product. A substantial majority felt that In Bruges could not reasonably be called Irish.

    It’s a slippery one. But you could — with apologies to Mr McDonagh’s parents — argue that the only thing Irish about Bruges is its two stars. Certainly the Irish Film and Television Academy felt Hunger was in and In Bruges was out. So does IMDB, which lists Hunger as UK/Ireland and In Bruges as UK/USA. I have to say I think that seems accurate.

    Comment by Donald Clarke
    4.
    December 19, 2009
    1:10 pm

    I bet Tim’s Alice won’t be a patch on this 2 minutes of fantasticness:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAwR6w2TgxY

    Comment by Cmac
    5.
    December 19, 2009
    1:58 pm

    I’ve never quite understood the cult of Burton. Edward Scissorhands, Beetlejuice, Ed Wood and Nightmare… are all solid films.
    But Sleepy Hollow is a bit of a mess, Planet of the Apes is a cinematic stillborn and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is stupefyingly creepy in not the intended way. Depp’s Willy Wonka felt like a character from the Murphy Report.
    The one that baffles me most is Sweeney Todd. It was vile. Aside from the dodgy music, it took one clever joke (ooh, didn’t think he’d slice his neck so suddenly) and recycled it like a recent Simpsons episode. Any director who can cast Timothy Spall (one of the most talented of actors around at the moment) and reduce him to a hissing, cane-stroking goon is beyond help.
    Alice looks pretty, but I won’t be surprised if it ends up a mess. And the trailer in 3D did very little for me.

    Oh, and as for the top Irish films, the exclusion of In Bruges was strange I thought. And at the risk of being disowned by my countrymen (and more importantly, my fellow Dubliners), Intermission is a joke of a film. No idea of what it wants to be, and it pretty much fails at being a film. It also contains the single worst use of flashback in the history of cinema. There, I feel much now!

    Comment by David Neary
    6.
    December 19, 2009
    2:03 pm

    Hey David, see note above on In Bruges. It’s very hard to justify calling it an Irish film. For the record, I really like it.

    Comment by Donald Clarke
    7.
    December 19, 2009
    3:45 pm

    thanks for the clarification Donald. who knew it was so difficult to make a purely irish film.

    Comment by bateman
    8.
    December 19, 2009
    4:12 pm

    Well, just to be accurate Bateman, the issue is not to do with being “purely” Irish; it’s to do with being “significantly” Irish. In my view, for example, Hunger is both British and Irish. So is The Wind that Shakes the Barley. Those films have a fair balance of Irish and British money and Irish and British personnel. Both were filmed in Ireland. So both countries can fairly claim them.

    As I say, there’s not much Irish about In Bruges — which, again, I really liked — apart from the two leads.

    Comment by Donald Clarke
    9.
    December 19, 2009
    4:44 pm

    Point taken Donald, I am suddenly reminded of an argument many years ago in which my brother called Braveheart a “Scottish film”.

    Comment by David Neary
    10.
    December 19, 2009
    5:18 pm

    Agree with Teddy @ 1. The Burton/Depp combination = way past its sell-by date. Don’t know if Mr Clarke has any influence in these matters but I wish there was a comments facility under the front-page photographs of the Irish Times. Today’s front-page photograph is so so beautiful — I could write a thesis on it. In fact, IMHO, the front-page photos are one of the few things which are interesting in the IT these days.

    Comment by barbera O'Shcokenzy
    11.
    December 19, 2009
    8:47 pm

    adam and paul was the best irish film i saw. Garage was pretty good too. When is Ireland going to produce a more sophisticated cinematic movement though? Dogme 95 – for all its shortcomings – would never happen here.

    hated intermission really, thought it was shot horribly. would have loved to have seen it photographed like robert elswit does for pt anderson, especially as I suspect the makers were aping those kind of sprawling disparate films that both him and altman do so well. (I mean, look at the poster).

    Comment by Derek
    12.
    December 20, 2009
    4:00 pm

    I’m pretty sick of Tim Burton. I found I liked his films much more in the 90s, both because he was relatively fresh back then and because I was a teenager, which made his gothic and shallow films more appealing.

    Oh, also, who gives a rat’s ass about Alice in Wonderland any more? Between the Disney film, the book, the numerous TV movies, interpretations, referrences and a Gwen Stefani video, surely our Lewis Carroll needs have been met?

    Comment by Joe Griffin
    13.
    December 21, 2009
    12:10 pm

    I agree with most of the misgivings about Mr. Burton. As with Guillermo del Toro, I reckon he has a talent for art direction but not for much more. A willed naivety may prevent him from achieving anything significant beyond the technical. His association with Mr. Depp will ensure that he will never clear the fences of the ersatz corral he has created for himself, as Mr. Depp increasingly seems to consider that smirking at the absurdity of acting constitutes an acceptable performance.
    I don’t necessarily share Mr. Griffin’s Lewis Carroll fatigue, although I can appreciate his exasperation, as recourse to the Alice books as a convenient source of surrealist ideas is often taken as an easy, lazy option. I reckon films derived from comics are more representative of Sloth, (and Greed), these days, although it would be interesting to see some poor unfortunate try to bring ‘Pongo Snodgrass’ or ‘The Leopard of Lime Street’ to the cineplexes.
    As to the best Irish films, emphatically ‘yes’ to ‘Hunger’ and ‘Adam and Paul’, a more qualified assent to ‘Intermission’, haven’t seen ‘Pavee Lackeen’ but ‘Once’…the nicest thing I could say about it would be that as a promotional video for a suite of dull songs it was entirely appropriate. I reckon the video for ‘Should Have Known Better’ by Jim Diamond provides more emotional bang for one’s buck.
    P.S. I understand the difficulty in defining a film as Irish, however am a tad aggrieved by the omission of ‘Flight of the Doves, ‘Taffin’, ‘The Fantasist’ and ‘Rawhead Rex’ from the list.

    Comment by Nam Citsale
    14.
    December 21, 2009
    12:44 pm

    Could not care less about Alice In Wonderland.
    I find that Burton is generally all fur coat and no ‘knackers’.
    The whole project scores a predictability rating of a million.

    That’s a top video from Cmac.

    Comment by Sean Brody
    15.
    December 21, 2009
    4:03 pm

    I agree with Joe Griffin that the whole Alice thing is rather jaded at this stage and that camping it up is unlikely to breath new life into a concept that has been so oft adapted. As a matter of fact the best adaptation I ever saw was in the Helix a couple of years ago (Landmark Productions) – a suberb and sober dramatisation with an excellent cast and brilliantly concieved set design. All the CGI in the world won’t displace it in my affections. I have fond memories of the books but am not sure I’ll ever read them again – too many books, too little time.

    For the record I really enjoyed Intermission. Loved Colm Meany and the whole Celtic mysticism bit and laughed long and loud and often. So there.

    Comment by Eleanor
    16.
    December 21, 2009
    4:38 pm

    Joe Griffen, I admire your point.

    Seriously, “who gives a rat’s ass about Alice In Wonderland any more?”
    I raised this point back during the whole Wolfman blog.
    Thanks to pop culture and countless interpretations everybody at this stage knows what happens in Alice in wonderland.
    The thing about Burton is he’s a one trick pony.
    Look Burton, we know the story, and the how doesn’t look all that fascinating.
    Any person can almost predict his next manoeuvre, such and such light-gothic/sub-fantasy tale starring Johnny Depp.

    I think if Burton wanted to dazzle minds he should make a film about Chernobyl.

    Comment by Smurphette
    17.
    December 21, 2009
    5:08 pm

    D. Neary: “Aside from the dodgy music.” You are generosity in person. Tim Burton is,perhaps, the most “unbalanced” directors around.

    Comment by eamon
    18.
    December 23, 2009
    11:27 am

    Nobody got any love for Big Fish ?
    Just me then, fair enough.

    Comment by Mully

    Leave a comment

    When submitted, your comment will be moderated and, once approved, will appear on the site.

    The Irish Times reserves the absolute right not to publish comments.


Search Screenwriter