• RSS
  • Text Size:
  • -
  • irishtimes.com - Posted: December 15, 2009 @ 5:25 pm

    Golden Globessszzzzzz…

    Donald Clarke

    aleqm5ierkkh0ymviuzrjht1fk9mmh-z4a.jpg

    I sense that awards fatigue is already setting in among readers, so I’ll just offer a brief paragraph on the announcement of the Golden Globe nominations this afternoon. There weren’t many surprises and our pointers towards the Oscars — for which the Globes are, despite what you might hear, no great predictors — remain largely unaltered. The big three are still The Hurt Locker, Precious and Up in the Air, all of which received nominations for best dramatic picture. Avatar, coming up on the rails, defies early bad buzz to become an awards player and Inglourious Basterds, boosted by the Weinstein’s goon squad, also secures an unexpected number of nods. The biggest surprise was, perhaps, Basterds beating Clint Eastwood’s Invictus to a best dramatic picture nomination. Is it all over for the great man’s study of South Africa’s attempt to win the Rugby World Cup? Not at all. Clint is nominated for best director and Morgan Freeman gets a nod for his turn as Nelson Mandela. The film will certainly be one of the 10 best picture nominees at the Oscars and could, erm, manage a scrum turnaround to score a late try-goal. (Could somebody tutor me on rugby metaphors before the blasted thing opens?)

    The big loser remains the poorly reviewed The Lovely Bones. After its kicking from the American press, nobody much expected Peter Jackson’s adaptation of the Alice Sebold novel to get a best picture nod, but our own Saoirse Ronan looked like a good bet for the best dramatic actress shortlist.  Sadly, the call did not come.

    The most outrageous exclusion is, however, A Serious Man in the best comedy or musical category. How to put this? The Coen Brothers latest is one of the very best films of the decade; Julie & Julia does not even deserve to pass water in the same lavatory. Stupid Hollywood Foreign Press Association! (Whoever the hell they are.)

    Ricky Gervais hosts the awards on January 17th.

  • 19 Comments »

    1.
    December 15, 2009
    7:39 pm

    Hmm… Looks like the Golden Globes managed to popularist without nominating ten films. The Oscars could learn from them.

    The drama/comedy divide always weirded me out, but I suppose comedies don’t generally do well at awards, so a bit of positive descrimination is justified.

    Comment by Darren
    2.
    December 15, 2009
    8:10 pm

    Never have I been so disinterested by awards season. Very few films that have got me interested.

    On the matter of the Oscars with their ten in each category…don’t you think that previously an Oscar nomination alone held some prestige? They’ve just gone and watered down their product. The studios will be delighted of course; most ‘Academy-aimed’ pictures will at least have a few nods they can boast about on their posters.
    But from now on the fact that a film gets a few nominations pretty much means nothing. The academy just devalued their currency.

    Comment by Derek
    3.
    December 15, 2009
    8:20 pm

    I absolutely agree, Derek. Indeed, I wrote a column saying that after the Academy made their announcement. What I would say is that henceforth Oscar-watchers will regard the best director nominations — still just five — as the real best picture shortlist. After all, though a few films have won when their director lost, you have to go back to Driving Miss Daisy to discover a film that won when its director wasn’t even nominated. I suspect — please correct me if I’m wrong guys and gals — that’s the only one.

    Comment by Donald Clarke
    4.
    December 15, 2009
    9:58 pm

    Hey Donald, it’s only ever happened three times: Wings in 1927, Grand Hotel in 1932 and Driving Miss Daisy in 1989.

    It says a lot about an organization that names Driving Miss Daisy the best picture in the same year Do The Right Thing was released.

    Comment by Q
    5.
    December 15, 2009
    10:07 pm

    Thanks for that, Q. I knew some wiz would dig up a few more examples. I think that Wings is an odd example, in that two films won at that first ceremony (Sunrise being the other).
    As regards Driving Miss Daisy, from 1989 you could also mention Crimes and Misdemeanours, The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and Her Lover, Drugstore Cowboy, Roger & Me, Sex Lies and Videotape and Say Anything. Heck, even My Left Foot is better than Driving Miss Daisy.

    Comment by Donald Clarke
    6.
    December 15, 2009
    10:24 pm

    I actually thought Driving Miss Daisy was a lovely film, though I admit giving it the Best Picture Oscar over Do The Right Thing was something akin to How Green Was My Valley winning the year Citizen Kane was nominated. Personally I didn’t think Lee’s film was that great but it’s seems to be the film most impressively standing the test of time from that year.

    Comment by Derek
    7.
    December 16, 2009
    1:06 am

    A Serious Man in the best comedy or musical? I liked it a lot but it’s neither fish nor fowl I’m afraid.

    Comment by NaRocRoc
    8.
    December 16, 2009
    1:10 am

    Quite so, NaRocRoc, but that is, apparently, the category in which Universal submitted it. It is by far the less competitive race, so they could reasonable have expected it to grab a spot.

    Comment by Donald Clarke
    9.
    December 16, 2009
    6:54 am

    sadly, I’ve hardly seen any of the movies from the nominee list – hopefully I’ll get to watch more of them before the awards night comes around

    Comment by Samuel Wright
    10.
    December 16, 2009
    10:53 am

    The five directing nominees = five real contenders logic is compelling, but it’s (very) slightly offset by the fact that two of the three films to win Best Picture without a directing nomination came from the decade where we had ten nominees.

    So, while it isn’t nearly consistent enough to demonstrate a trend (two films does not equal a trend), you could make the case that two occurrences in ten years is far more common than one occurrence in sixty years.

    Comment by Darren
    11.
    December 16, 2009
    11:48 am

    The Globes always manage to make a vomit-inducing snub. Remember last year Milk getting only one nomination for Sean Penn? A Serious Man is this year’s Milk.

    I didn’t like Invictus or Morgan Freeman’s performance, I think people are too condescending with him and Clint Eastwood, who is arguably the most egocentric director working today. He’s obsesed with awards and only makes movies that are Oscar-baity.

    At least they snubbed An Education too, a film I consider to be vastly overrated.

    Comment by Andres
    12.
    December 16, 2009
    4:03 pm

    You’ve got to admit it though awards season is the best time of the year for the ‘auld bit of downloading.
    There’s such many screeners on the web, and all perfect quality.

    Of course, I would never do such a thing….

    Comment by Cormpat
    13.
    December 16, 2009
    4:14 pm

    Hard to know what to think when 3 of the best movies (and none of the best actor) nominations haven’t opened here yet.
    Excited about seeing Precious because I’m reading Push right now for my movie ecker.
    A Serious Man is a serious film.

    I think Q chose Do Th Right Thing because of the two films’ attitudes to race relations and how the academy will go for sugar-coated every time.
    Or I could be wrong.

    Comment by Sean Brody
    14.
    December 17, 2009
    12:31 pm

    Donald,

    Any chance of posting a few of your reviews – Ghosts of Christmas past if you will – to cover some of the movies that will be showing over Christmas?

    Some of the classics never got the benefit of your inclination towards the scabrous and would doubtless be of great benefit to me as I try to encourage the Missus to watch anything other than her favouritist film of all time – sex and the city (oh the opprobium).

    She dozed off during the Third Man last week so I am close to giving up.

    Comment by robespierre
    15.
    December 17, 2009
    2:01 pm

    I’m with you M. Robespierre, although I am worried that with all of the requests from various quarters on the blog, Mr. Clarke won’t have the time or inclination, (which is understandable). In any case, you have my vote, for what it is worth, although I am struggling to remember what ‘classics’ will be foisted on us this Christmas.
    As to your efforts in attempting to brainwash your other half, I encourage you to desist, in the interest of peace of mind and social equilibrium. In the name of love, (oh yes, slay me where I sit), I have had to endure the likes of ‘13 Going on 30′, ‘PS I Love You’, ‘Good Luck Chuck’ and ‘The Proposal’ in recent times and I can assure you my experiences have done nothing to alter my preferred viewing habits. If anything, they have just intensified my questionable need to watch the likes of Michael Winner’s ‘The Sentinel’ again and again.
    Could anyone recommend a decent psychiatrist?

    Comment by Nam Citsale
    16.
    December 17, 2009
    3:04 pm

    Andres @ 11 – couldn’t agree more. Clint’s films are big, rich, bloated Oscar-friendly snoozefests. Million Dollar Baby was awful, Flags Of Our Fathers simply dull and unengaging. He’s one of these directors that is admired for his ‘craft’, yet his movies are cold, calculated shells with little to involve the viewer IMO.

    Comment by Noise Annoys
    17.
    December 17, 2009
    6:21 pm

    Looking at Nam Citsale’s post, I can’t help wondering if he feels any better for airing his grimmest movie memories, so with your permission of course Donald, I’d like to give it a go.

    It was Christmas time, many years ago
    and I accompanied my parents to my uncle and aunt’s house. An angry young 17 year-old, my cynical certainties were brutally crushed by being left in an over-heated, over-decorated room, with a paper hat on my head and a bottle of 7-Up at my side, and forced to watch King Ralph and Kindergarten Cop in quick succession.

    The cloying smell of a Christmas tree, or even a stuffy room, is enough to revive the harrowing memory, such is the mark it left upon me.

    Thanks for listening…

    Comment by Donal
    18.
    December 17, 2009
    10:37 pm

    King Ralph and Kindergarten Cop are like subtle comedic masterpieces compared to being in the cinema with your girlfriend watching The Terminal. I regularly walk out of the cinema if I’m not enjoying a film but it’s impossible when with one person, so I had to sit through Hanks and Zeta-Jones trying and failing miserably to even garner one spark of chemistry between them. Meanwhile, Hanks, portraying (no offence spared) some generic Eastern European as a bumbling fool just happy to be in a cradle of capitalism. And we’re supposed to believe that the beautiful jetsetting air hostess sees a life partner in this airport-residing bum. Puh-lease. Incidentally I think my missus liked it, but won’t admit as much now.

    Comment by Derek
    19.
    December 18, 2009
    11:50 am

    I don’t get this obsession with trying to make the major awards shows more “populist”. If I want to spend four hours worshiping every expulsion by messrs Tarantino and Cameron, I’ll read Empire front to back thank you very much. The Oscars and Globes are a brief moment in time when people who know nothing about movies get shown snippets from films that are slightly better than the tripe they favour. Good for them.

    As for bad movie experiences, I’ve had many, but watching Inland Empire with a girlfriend who had no previous experience of Lynch and began stirring angrily after 15 minutes certainly stands out. She didn’t talk to me for 2 days after…

    Comment by David Neary

    Leave a comment

    When submitted, your comment will be moderated and, once approved, will appear on the site.

    The Irish Times reserves the absolute right not to publish comments.


Search Screenwriter