• RSS
  • Text Size:
  • -
  • irishtimes.com - Posted: December 6, 2009 @ 7:04 pm

    Boo! It’s the five #$*!est films of the decade.

    Donald Clarke

    You haven’t escaped from this end-of-decade stuff, yet. Oh no, my friend. There’s a great deal more of this idiotic list-making still to come. Obviously, picking the worst films released theatrically this decade is — for those of us infected by snark, at least — a particularly delicious activity. If, however, you write about film for a living then you are presented with several difficulties. For starters, we see a great deal of obscure garbage that only stays in cinemas for minutes and, were we composing an entirely objective list of the most unspeakable ordure, it could end up looking something like this:

    5. FeardotCom 4. Botched 3. I Want Candy 2. Paparazzi 1. The Calcium Kid.

    “Huh?” I hear you say. If you don’t watch films as part of your job — and you’re not an inmate of a mental institution — then I wouldn’t boast about having seen too many of that bunch. One or two of the titles above do, it is true, pass into that near-mythical so-bad-it’s-good territory — I wouldn’t have missed Botched for the world — but, for the most part, they induce such discomfort they should be banned by a UN directive.

    It seems unfair to include stuff that was really aimed at the straight-to-DVD market (such as FeardotCom) or pictures made on a very low budget (Botched, again). What we want is spectacular catastrophes from major studios or  films that have genuinely malevolent intent. Here, then, is the real bottom five. Having issued that proviso in the opening paragraph, I am aware that at least one of these films was seen by virtually nobody, but sometimes you have to sacrifice your principles for the greater good. That’s the Realpolitik of filth documentation, comrade.

    5. PUFFBALL (2007)

    YouTube Preview Image

    It gives me no pleasure to reveal that one of most appalling films of the decade was by a truly great director. Nic Roeg came to Ireland and, rather than delivering a new Don’t Look Now, spewed up a borderline-racist pile of quasi-satirical hokum. The late-night screening at the Galway Film Fleadh seemed to last about 12 hours.

    4. CHRISTMAS WITH THE KRANKS (2004)

    YouTube Preview Image

    This, you’ll be surprised to hear, is the real answer to the question: “What’s the worst film ever based on a John Grisham book?”. Christmas with the Kranks  stands in for a whole raft of gut-bustingly unholy Christmas films — The Santa Clause 3, anyone? — that fouled up December throughout the decade, but, with its quasi-fascist argument for suburban conformity, it comfortably takes the mince pie.

    3. REVOLVER (2005)

    YouTube Preview Image

    Is that the sound of clattering bullet shells or is it the noise of the audience’s jaws collectively dropping to the floor? For those of us who defended Guy Ritchie in the early days, this fantastically pretentious, monumentally boring voyage up his own ring-piece constituted a kind of awful betrayal. Maybe Sherlock Holmes doesn’t look so promising after all.

    2. SEX AND THE CITY (2008)

    YouTube Preview Image

    “Just get me a really big closet?” Okay. Then I’ll lock all four of you in it, put a breeze block against the doors and listen happily as you starve to a deserved death. A controversial choice? It shouldn’t be. The movie — to a significantly greater extent than the series or book — is witless, reactionary bilge that seems intent on going to the lavatory over the most significant achievements of feminism. I’m so looking forward to the upcoming sequel.

    1. WHAT THE #$*! DO WE KNOW!? (2004)

    YouTube Preview Image

    What now? Yes, this mind-numbingly dishonest, consistently deranged slice of new-age propaganda did actually play in a commercial cinema during the last decade. An attempt to use the physics of the subatomic to prove that big macroscopic objects such as you, me and that woman out of Children of a Lesser God interact in ways outlined by Dr Bonkers of the Mumbo Jumbo University, the picture would be funny if it didn’t have such sinister undertones. Featuring a great many students of something called Ramtha’s School of Enlightenment, this terrible, terrible film — the dramatised sequences have to be seen to be believed — makes arguments that increasing numbers of otherwise sane folk take seriously. For all the wretchedness of, say, Norbit, you couldn’t say it pointed the way towards global collective insanity. Mind you, The Da Vinci Code was a different matter.

  • 35 Comments »

    1.
    December 7, 2009
    1:13 am

    2 words: The Room.

    Comment by Adam
    2.
    December 7, 2009
    1:55 am

    I haven’t seen this notorious anti-masterpiece, Adam. But my own list does just cover pictures released theatrically in Ireland. Nobody has been crazy enough to release The Room in Ireland yet.

    I must dig it out.

    Comment by Donald Clarke
    3.
    December 7, 2009
    2:13 am

    So many astonishingly bad films this decade. Here are a list of the worst ones:

    Breakfast On Pluto
    Bridget Jones: The Edge Of Reason
    Proof Of Life
    The Terminal

    Disgusting films, the lot of them.

    Comment by Derek
    4.
    December 7, 2009
    10:29 am

    Instead of an objective list of ‘bad movies’ here are the four movies I walked out of / almost walked out of over the last decade.

    1. Atonement (I generally hate upper-class twittery period dramas, but was convinced by the overwhelming praise to go see this movie. I shouldn’t have listened to the advice. Insufferable)

    2. Volver (Penelope Cruz is unbearable in English-speaking roles, and not much easier to take in her native tongue)

    3. A History of Violence (a cartoonish, bland action flick, over-rated because David Cronenberg directed it. I was about to exit the cinema when the film came to an extremely abrupt end. Thankfully)

    4. Inglorious Basterds. (the only reason I stayed until the end for this one was the fact that I was meeting some friends later and it was warm in the cinema)

    Comment by Noise Annoys
    5.
    December 7, 2009
    11:07 am

    300 (2006)
    Away We Go (2009)
    The Boat That Rocked (2009)
    Breakfast on Pluto (2005)
    Che (Part Two) (2008)
    Die Another Day (2002)
    Dorothy Mills (2008)
    The Escapist (2008)
    Full Frontal (2002)
    Hamlet 2 (2008)
    Hitman (2007)
    The Human Stain (2003)
    I Heart Huckabees (2004)
    Law Abiding Citizen (2009)
    The Matrix Revolutions (2003)
    Observe and Report (2008)
    Quantum of Solace (2008)
    Rachel Getting Married (2008)
    Ripley’s Game (2002)
    Waking Life (2001)

    Comment by redframewhitelight
    6.
    December 7, 2009
    1:52 pm

    The Room is amazing!! Amazingly bad, but still so good, you couldn’t put it on a ‘worst of..’ list.

    Comment by catcat
    7.
    December 7, 2009
    2:20 pm

    Gangs of New York was not half as bad as most films mentioned above, but I would like to give it a special mention as the most frustrating film of the decade.

    I have argued long and hard with anybody who’ll listen that the ending has little or nothing to do with the preceding 2.5 hours or so. I remember leaving the cinema feeling completely baffled. It would have made just as much sense to have Leonardo and Daniel killed in a hail of fire from a passing helicopter gunship.

    As a film critic of some renown, I would like your opinion on this matter!

    Comment by Donal
    8.
    December 7, 2009
    2:37 pm

    I wouldn’t put it down there on top of the Boo list but “The Changeling” (2008 Dir. Clint Eastwood, starring Angelina Jolie) was one of the biggest recent disappointment movies of the Noughties. Angelina, what’s not to like? But that hat and those red lips – everything else seemed inconsequential – especially her supposedly beloved child, with whom Angelina didn’t display an iota of connection. Could have been a great movie. “The Girl in the Park” (2007 Dir. David Aurburn, starring Sigourney Weaver) was far superior. Also “Gone Baby Gone” (2007 Dir. Ben Affleck, starring Casey Affleck), which also could have been much better, was far superior. There’s something missing, though in all these missing movies. PS I played all 5 of Donald’s Boo list trailers at the same time. Disturbing.

    Comment by barbera O'Shcokenzy
    9.
    December 7, 2009
    4:13 pm

    Some comments on the above:

    Looking down RedFrame’s list, I would defend 300 (completely idiotic, but fun), Away We Go (harmless), The Escapist (really gripping until the stupid twist) and Waking Life (the pretentiousness is part of the fun). Glad to see the woeful Ripley’s Game, the painful I Heart Huckabees and the unnecessarily terrible Boat that Rocked.

    I agree about Gangs of New York. The truth is, surely, that both Gangs and the Aviator were fatuous bores that confirmed — see the cracking The Departed — that the older Scorsese should shelve the “long-cherished” projects and stick to genre pieces and documentaries. If you ask me (and you kind of did) his two best films of the decade were My Voyage to Italy and No Direction Home.

    I am not rising to the bait of A History of Violence, Mr Noise, and I also liked Volver. But, yeah Atonement was a little overpraised

    The worst film listed above, in my view, is, without doubt, Bridget Jones: The Edge Of Reason. The “funny” scene in the Thai prison is quite jaw-dropping. The Give My Head Peace team might have balked.

    Comment by Donald Clarke
    10.
    December 7, 2009
    5:19 pm

    As time has gone on, I realise more and more that I just don’t like Almodovar’s lighter movies. Their shrill, camp tone annoys me, simple as that.

    Of course, my selections are very subjective and both A History of Violence and Inglorious Basterds really seem to divide opinion. Fair enough.

    Moving away from the films themselves, what do you think is the single most interesting development in the industry in the last 10 years? Digital video? 3D? Consolidation of the studios?

    Comment by Noise Annoys
    11.
    December 7, 2009
    5:32 pm

    I suppose the most influential will end up being the various types of digital video. (I have to select my words carefully here, as techies are want to complain about misuse of both “digital” and “video”.) Somewhere in the middle of the decade, it became genuinely difficult — unless you were watching a Michael Mann flick — to tell if a big-budget feature was shot on film or video. Once that happened, film began, sadly, to look doomed.

    I’ve barked on about the regrettable rise of 3-D elsewhere. We will have to see what happens with Avatar, but my instinct is that it will remain tied to a niche market (if a niche can be HUGE). I reckon kids films and animation will continue to be shot in the format, but, the odd action flick aside, it will fail to extend beyond those areas. Interestingly, its main effect has been to finally persuade exhibitors to install digital projection systems. That change was predicted half a decade ago, but it took the digital 3-D boom to persuade them it was worthwhile.

    Comment by Donald Clarke
    12.
    December 7, 2009
    5:45 pm

    I was gonna slate Mamma Mia, but on second thoughts, it is what it tries to be. It’s just tat what it tried to be makes me ill.

    Otherwise, Transformers 2 tops my list. Far more confused than it’s predecessor, wants to be slapstick, romance, end of the world flick but falls flat on it’s face.

    Also, can’t even begin to list the amount of terrible horror films this decade either.

    Comment by Adam
    13.
    December 7, 2009
    7:34 pm

    Is there something wrong with me? I enjoyed ‘Away we go’. Less rigid and mannered than his previous films.
    Anything with Will Smith should be on the list. I have a friend I no longer talk to after he said he thought Will Smith was a good actor!

    Comment by Motorcycle Boy
    14.
    December 8, 2009
    11:28 am

    Miami Vice! watched an hour of it again on tv the other night just in case i misjudged it in the cinema. I didnt. It is awful. Go faster boats, the asian lady who cant speak english and Colin Farrels hair being just a few of the reasons. The final shootout looks like a load of drunks mucking about with toy guns while its being recorded on a cheap camera phone. Honourable mention goes to all the george clooney films where he appears to be having more fun making the film than i am watching it, men who stare at goats, oceans whatever and leatherheads etc. Also the raft of unfunny romcoms that i was dragged to as a result of makin the misses sit through Rescue Dawn (great). What happens in vegas, in her shoes and Four Christmases all made me feel quite dirty and uncomfortable, actually thats what she said about Rescue Dawn, fairs fair i suppose.

    Comment by bateman
    15.
    December 8, 2009
    11:37 am

    9 Songs

    Just an awful awful film

    Comment by higgs
    16.
    December 8, 2009
    12:35 pm

    Anybody see Heart of America? A very pretentious rambling film about high school shootings that seems to be trying to teach some moral: the moral was vague, something like ‘it was the victims own fault.’

    Strength and Honour anybody, wow that was in the ‘it’s so bad it’s good category. I’d definitely recommend it to anybody wanting an ironic accidental comedy.

    Virtually any action film other than the Bourne movies and a few others would make this list for me. When did it become ok to replace plot with running. Take Terminator 3 for instance, it’s two hours of robots running after eachother.

    Breakfast on Pluto? Atonement? That’s a little harsh isn’t it guys. How about a list of most overrated films of the decade Donal? Then we could accommodate much more bitching.

    Comment by Brian
    17.
    December 8, 2009
    12:43 pm

    Where to start? Well how about The Cat in The Hat (2003). Good old Theodore Seuss Geisel wrote the wonderful Cat in the Hat in response to criticism that childrens literature had become too boring and this was leading to a drop in literacy. He took 220 essential words and crafted this classic using these words and only these…and there the story should end. Reluctant to see any of his work used in a medium outside of the printed word Seuss (the Dr. was an affectation) grudgingly allowed a few lesser works to be animated during his lifetime. The great man died aged 87 in 1991 and his widow approved in quick succession the – in my opinion – execrable Grinch and equally awful Cat in the Hat. Allegedly even she had the grace to distance herself from the latter and vow that never again would a Dr Seuss adaptation see the light of day (although the later Horton Hears a Who was passable). With a deeply irritating Mike Meyers assuming the role of the eponymos cat this offering quickly descends into a sickly sweet confection of morality tales and mawkishness shot in garish psychedelic hues. The real tragedy is that the kids love it. Why couldn’t they just leave well alone?

    Comment by Eleanor
    18.
    December 8, 2009
    1:12 pm

    Delighted to hear you mention Strength and Honour, Brian. It was a real rub-your-eyes-in-disbelief experience. If you promise to stop calling me “Donal” I may well launch and over- or under-rated strand.

    Having read your comments on the Seuss films, Eleanor, I’ll be interested to hear what you make of Where the Wild Things Are.

    Comment by Donald Clarke
    19.
    December 8, 2009
    1:40 pm

    LOVE ACTUALLY is the worst i’ve seen. i hated it, most films starring hugh grant are dreadful.
    i have a new script for you mr grant, you play a stuttering upper class english twat. ‘I CAN DO IT’

    Comment by petee
    20.
    December 8, 2009
    1:56 pm

    Wolverine – by far the biggest disappointment for me. As an Marvel Comics devotee I’ve no problem in stating my belief that this film makes ‘Batman and Robin’ look half decent.

    Reeker – this still baffles me how this made it into commercial cinema, I actually snuck into an better film afterwards because it felt like I had been robbed. (Then again, this makes Wolverine seem awesome)

    Synecdoche, New York – people keep trying to insist that the reason I didn’t like this film was because I ‘didn’t get it’… well i have news for those sycophants; I did get it, and I didn’t like it!

    Max Payne – nuff said!

    Death Proof – I loved Planet Terror, but when I watched this I couldn’t escape the fact that there was no conviction behind any of the dialogue (from the otherwise pointless script) and it seemed to be that Quenten Tarantino literally had his hand up the actresses arses and using them to spout over the top (aka typical tarantino) fan boy rants…. that is not how women talk… not even in exploitation films.

    Inglorious Basterds – Much for the same reason as the above film, but replace women with Jews.
    I cannot hear or see any of the actors, all i see is Quentin flapping his gums for 2 hours to the point i don’t even care Hitler’s face is getting melted off with a round of bullets.

    The Happening – day of the triffids minus the triffids… ye wha?

    Happiness of Katakuris – I normally enjoy Takeshi Miike’s weirder films… i watched this, turned it off, gave it a second chance and turned it off again.

    Dreamcather – Alien disguises himself as a handicapped child and gives these four guys special powers… sounds hilarious right? It just didn’t cut the mustard with me I’m afraid. Read the book instead.

    Dead End – is just bad.

    Terminator 3 and Salvation

    Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon. – anything that remotely resembles it’s style. Kung Fu + Wire Work is just an abomination.
    (Don’t be discouraged, I do love kung fu)

    Spider-Man 3 – (enter long diatribe here)

    Indiana Jones 4 – And the “Indiana Jones In the fridge award goes to…”

    Comment by Smurphette
    21.
    December 8, 2009
    2:07 pm

    Perversely, Smurphette, I would like to commend your comments on a film I loved: Synecdoche, New York. The “you don’t get it” argument is not any kind of argument at all. The only type of internet post that annoys me more is — when discussing something vaguely middle-brow — “if you like stuff Norbit and Transformers then this is not for you”.

    Anyway, I still loved Synecdoche.

    Comment by Donald Clarke
    22.
    December 8, 2009
    2:33 pm

    Oops sorry Donald, I promise not to call you Donal again. I’m not sure where I got that from actually.
    Just thought of Monster in Law: complete no hitter. No chemistry between the leads (no rom), the jokes were poor (no com) and the usually hilarious Wanda Sykes reduced to playing a crude caricature of herself. There were probably worse romantic comedies but I didn’t see ‘em.

    Comment by Brian
    23.
    December 8, 2009
    2:40 pm

    That’s genuinely pleasing to hear.

    It still surprises me that there are some narrow minded people who tend to get offended (for inadequate reasons) for disliking or even to go as far as hating a film they loved.

    After a while I ceased to discuss film with people in general as a rule to myself purely because I tend to have an ‘advantage’ so to speak and a lot of people I know are simply not as interested in them the same way so it’s usually lobsided conversation.

    Comment by Smurphette
    24.
    December 8, 2009
    4:57 pm

    I know it’s a “masterpiece” and I really tried, but I really couldn’t – twice – sit through til the end of There Will Be Blood. Found it relentlessly grim.
    Also bad – most flicks with Colin Farrell. Even In Bruges.

    Here’s what I did love though:

    The Savages
    (w/the equally great Philip Seymour Hoffman & Laura Linney)

    Squid & The Whale (Laura Linney again)
    Waitress
    Shopgirl
    Kissing Jessica Stein
    Forgetting Sarah Marshall

    Away From Her
    Gran Torino
    Mystic River
    Gone, Baby Gone

    Juno
    Little Miss Sunshine
    Lost in Translation

    …and the mad good Napoleon Dynamite

    Comment by Sligorover
    25.
    December 8, 2009
    6:00 pm

    Glad to see someone mention I heart Huckabees on their list of horrid films. I suffered through it as long as I could thinking there must be something redeeming in it, something worth the money, but gave up and for only the second time in my film lover’s life walked out.

    Comment by kate
    26.
    December 8, 2009
    6:18 pm

    Yes, I’ll be really interested to see what Spike Jonze does with WTWTA. It’s such a beautiful book but very short (just 338 words apparently) and a lot of interpretation and back story are therefore called for. However, from what I’ve heard he’s kept it dark and avoided patronising an audience that will once again include children and their adults who have fond memories of the book. I believe it opens here on Friday – I’ll certainly go along and do expect a more loving & sympathetic treatment.

    Comment by Eleanor
    27.
    December 8, 2009
    8:03 pm

    Did you see Ultraviolet with Milla Jovovich? It’s beyond words.

    Also the Waynes’ Brothers Little Man might just be the worst movie of the decade – and by ‘the’ decade, I mean ‘any’ decade.

    Comment by Declan Cashin
    28.
    December 9, 2009
    2:07 am

    Oh, I dunno, The Pursuit of Happyness and Watchmen struck me as two that really made me want my money back, but in general i can spot a turkey a mile off and won’t waste my time and money.

    Donald, your post about that irritating Meteor ad has appeared in my feedreader but is not on the blog for some reason. Anyway, here’s a poll you may (or may not) approve of:
    http://twentymajor.net/2009/12/08/who-is-the-biggest-cunt-in-ireland-today/#comments

    Comment by Andrew
    29.
    December 9, 2009
    2:09 am

    and yeah, Sex and the City was abysmal enough to make the TV show look like fine art.

    Comment by Andrew
    30.
    December 9, 2009
    9:44 am

    One of the thing’s I was not impressed by in regards to the Sex and the City film (aside from the material overtones) was that they actually used a diarrhoea joke…

    Right, I saw this film with a bunch of girls who all laughed at this part, yet I seem to remember watching Dumb and Dumber (with majority of the same bunch of girls) which also includes a diarrhoea scene, yet none of them laughed, their reasons being that it was a immature…

    Also, Declan Cashin mentioned Ultraviolet, good call! It is very hard to watch.
    Oddly enough it reminds me of the film ‘Boy Eats Girl’ now THAT was a terrible film. It doesn’t even make the so-bad-it’s-good category.

    Comment by Smurphette
    31.
    December 9, 2009
    10:15 am

    No Donald, you for sure are not alone with regard to the “Carol singers from hell ad” — but where’s the post gone? Intriguing. Got to be something to do with the stasi surveillence equipment.

    Comment by barbera O'Shcokenzy
    32.
    December 9, 2009
    10:32 am

    Pursuit of Happiness was horrible.

    Man dreams of making loadsa money in a soulless profession simply because he can make loadsa money in it and I’m supposed to find the kid cute?

    Go fuck yourself, American dream.

    Comment by Steve K
    33.
    December 9, 2009
    12:18 pm

    I still don’t know what to make of Synechdoche, New York. I was really impressed, but not entertained. Its relentless sadness was overwhelming, and I haven’t been able to bring myself to watch it again. I loved its ambition, certainly, and its courage in tackling life’s core truth (we will die, and lose everyone special to us) but it’s very tough to get through.

    Comment by Noise Annoys
    34.
    December 9, 2009
    1:14 pm

    Death Proof – given the people involved and the script it was really, really, really, really bad

    Everything by Guy Ritchie

    A good year – Oh Ridley the hubris. Was it not enough that this dirge nearly ruined the great John Thaw…

    The girls and boys from county clare – profoundly bad

    Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull – moronic rubbish in a bad way rather than the original fun way

    Nine songs – total rubbish – why is Michael Winterbottom still getting to make films

    That Mike Figgis movie about a movie set in Venice with vampires – really bad on every level imaginable

    Comment by robespierre
    35.
    December 9, 2009
    1:54 pm

    I was at that screening of Puffball, and felt very bad for Roeg when he appeared afterwards to answer questions. It was, by a considerable margin, the worst film he has directed. (With the possible exception of the one or two I haven’t seen.) Great to finally catch Don’t Look Now on the big screen though.

    Comment by Stan

    Leave a comment

    When submitted, your comment will be moderated and, once approved, will appear on the site.

    The Irish Times reserves the absolute right not to publish comments.


Search Screenwriter