Vat change: What difference does it make?
Conor Pope
I have been talking about the ridiculous discrepancies that exist between the same shops north and south of the border for years now as have many other people in the media but nothing really seems to get done about it.
I have had hundreds – if not thousands of complaints about the problem and every shop from Argos to Zara stands accused of ripping off their shoppers in the south. But when challenged the retailers either ignore the complaints entirely or dismiss them with vague references to higher overheads in the Republic.
Repeated surveys have found that retailers operating both North and South are charging well over 20 per cent more in the Republic. Surveys showed that Argos hiked its prices in the Republic by an average 24 per cent while Halfords slapped on an additional 28 per cent on average. When H&M started selling shoes by Jimmy Choo they added an additional 45 per cent on to the prices in their Irish stores. Say what you like about higher overheads, they’re not in that ballpark.
It is a real problem not just for consumers but for the State. It is costing the Irish exchequer money. 16 per cent of Irish households made at least one shopping trip to the North during the period to July, and shoppers from Dublin accounted for one-third of all trips. Retail Ireland said that, in addition to job losses, cross-Border shopping was costing the State €220 million a year in income tax lost and social welfare payments.
Last month the Budget attempted to curb the exodus of the Republic’s shoppers flocking north. It lopped 20 per cent off excise duty on alcohol and the minister for finance Brian Lenihan also announced that the top rate of VAT would be cut to 21 per cent from 21.5 per cent from January 1st.
These moves combined with a 2.5 per cent increase in the same tax in Northern Ireland to 17.5 per cent, is supposed stem the flow of shoppers crossing the border. The combined effect of the VAT changes on both sides of the Border have been to cut the difference in VAT rates to 3.5 per cent from 6.5 per cent.
The move was widely welcomed with business groups saying the VAT cut would give retailers down south a real opportunity to compete with traders north of the Border.
Hmm, really? While the VAT and excise changes have made a difference it is very slight and I am not sure if is enough to narrow the gap between prices north and south of the border to a sufficient level to stop people crossing the border. .
I filled a shopping basket with 14 items sourced in Tesco and Argos in the Republic and Sainsbury’s and Argos in the North in December when the old VAT regime was in place and again in January when the changes had taken affect to see what difference it made.
There was very little change between the prices in Tesco in the Republic between the end of December and the beginning of January when the new VAT and excise rates took affect.
So a basket of goods including whiskey, Guinness, wine, razor blades and shampoo – there was no point in including food because it is zero rated for Vat – which cost €91.40 in December cost €91.58 in early January. The reason why it increased was because the sparkling wine I priced went up by a couple of euro while some of the other items – including Jacob’s Creek wine, Gillette Razor blades fell in price but only a small amount was shaved of those prices, if you’ll forgive the terrible pun.
Four fairly big ticket items bought in Argos in Dublin – a Nikon camera, a Sony netbook, an iPod and a LG TV which cost €1809 in December cost €1811 in January – so virtually difference there.
There biggest price shifts happened north of the border because of the higher rate of Vat. So the same basket of goods which I bought in Tesco in the Republic for €91.40 cost €72.39 in December and €83.40 in January. That is because the price of the alcohol in Sainsbury’s increased quite significantly.
The price of the four items in Argo in the North which cost €1297 in December cost €1385. Again that is not an insignificant increase and is down to the higher Vat rates.
But probably the most important figure is the final total for the basket of items north and south today. The cost of the 14 items in the in the North was €433.92 cheaper in January and €531.21 cheaper in December.
So, clearly the gap has narrowed but the question is has in narrowed enough.

12:39 pm
Well surely to stem the flow of shoppers we don’t need total parity? The gap just needs to be closed to a point where the incentive is not strong enough to encourage shoppers north.
Comment by AndrewFor example you may drive a few hours up north to save €500, but you may not bother if you’ll only save €250.