• RSS
  • Text Size:
  • -
  • irishtimes.com - Posted: January 10, 2010 @ 11:14 pm

    Bin diets – get slim for less

    Conor Pope

    LAST WEEK Pricewatch received a press release issued on behalf of Lyons Tea. “New research from China has found that regular consumption of green tea, which is rich in catechins, can have a very real and positive effect on weight loss and the body shape of moderately overweight Chinese individuals,” it read.

    Despite not being a “moderately overweight Chinese individual” we read on.
    Turns out that the “new investigation”, which was funded by the Lipton Institute of Tea, monitored the effects of green tea consumption on body weight, body fat mass and fat distribution in just 182 people and found that, compared to a control group, they lost weight and toned up after 90 days.

    This “news” prompted Gráinne Galvin of Lyons Tea to issue the release in which she claimed it would be “interesting to see further research to determine if the same effects occur in other populations, such as here in Ireland”.

    It is a complete non-story with virtually no relevance to an Irish audience but in January, when so many of us are determined to shed the pounds piled on over Christmas, businesses appear willing to go to almost any lengths to link themselves to a positive weight loss story.
    And to be fair to Lyons Tea, drinking green tea is better than many of the dieting options presented to bloated, hungover and overweight consumers in January.

    Has the Metabolism Miracle killed GI? Do South Beach and Atkins have any currency or is the Diet Plate Calorie Counted Breakfast Cereal Bowl – yours for just €20 – a better option? Will the 30-day Shred Plan shed excess pounds or would you be better off eating acai berries which will either see you “lose 30 pounds in 30 days” or lose €30 every 10 days, depending on which website you visit.

    Right now Amazon.com is selling around 10,000 diet books as well as countless pills, workout DVDs and talking fridge magnets, but almost everything out there will not, according to nutritionists and doctors, help people lose weight in the long term.

    The diet industry in the US alone is worth in excess of €50 billion annually. Figures for Ireland are harder to come by, but given our insatiable appetite for revolutionary diet plans and the amount of diet magazines and books stocked in shops, the cost of weight loss in Ireland runs into hundreds of millions of euro each year.

    Repeated surveys over many years from medical experts and consumer groups have shown that between 90 and 95 per cent of all diet programmes fail.
    Dr Joe Fitzgibbon runs weight-loss clinics in Dublin and Galway and has written extensively on the topic of weight loss from a medical perspective.

    He accepts that some diet programmes may have a short-term benefit for some people and lead to rapid weight loss in the early stages, but says no diet programme will be sufficient to keep weight off long term. “You have to change your lifestyle and that can be a very hard thing for people to do,” he says. We live in an “almost totally automated world where we do very little by way of exercise and that is contributing hugely to the problem.

    “If the nation was to suffer a power cut for just 30 minutes every evening and all the televisions were to go off, leading people to go for a walk, then not only would you see people lose weight you would also knock 30 per cent off the national healthcare bill.”

    Darya Pino a San Francisco-based University of California scientist and self-styled foodie agrees. She offers a scientific perspective on health and nutrition through her blog, Summer Tomato, and is a frequent contributor to the hugely influential Huffington Post.
    On New Year’s Eve she posted to that site under the headline “A New Decade’s Resolution: Quit Dieting”.

    The post offered 10 simple and cheap alternatives to the dieting yo-yo – eat more vegetables, less desserts, take the stairs and eat slower are just four of her simple suggestions.
    Speaking to The Irish Times last week, Pino said the logic behind the diet industry was flawed. “While it is definitely possible, almost easy, to lose weight on any short-term diet, unless new permanent habits are developed the weight will come back.

    “Diets stop working for most people after six months even if they stick to them.”
    She believes that one of the reasons the dieting industry continues to thrive despite its obvious failures is because for some people the act of going on a diet is a source of comfort “because it helps you feel in control of your life. We are shown celebrities who have lost weight and we want to know how they did it. Our selective memories forget that even celebrities will probably gain the weight back in a few months or years.”

    The VHI offers online tailor-made diet packages where subscribers can input their personal details including food likes and dislikes and it builds programmes lasting between six and 10 weeks. The insurer’s marketing director Declan Moran is keen to distance the VHI’s programmes from the faddy diets.

    He accepts they will not work for many people, particularly for the 15-20 per cent of Irish people who are clinically obese, but says that for others weight loss is about making smaller changes that will stop them sliding into the obese category and online programmes can be useful.

    “It is a tiny, tiny part of our business and not a big money spinner but we are genuinely trying to get people into a space where they look after themselves as best they can.”
    In the early 1990s the US-based National Institutes of Health (NIH) Technology Conference published a list of recommendations for consumers considering weight-loss programmes.

    The recommendations may be nearly 20 years old but they are as relevant now as they ever were. “In evaluating a weight-loss method or program, one should not be distracted by anecdotal ‘success’ stories, or by advertising claims,” it cautioned.

    It suggested that before embarking on any programme, consumers should find out the percentage of all participants who completed it, the percentage who had achieved various degrees of weight loss and the proportion of that weight loss that was maintained at one, three, and five years.

    One suspects that if this criteria was applied by all dieters, the industry as we know it would collapse overnight.

    Pino says the only long-term strategy for tackling the obesity crisis which is engulfing the developed world is to work toward building a positive relationship with healthy, wholefoods.
    “Most of us have forgotten what garden-fresh broccoli or homegrown summer tomatoes taste like. But rediscovering them is a wonderful feeling that we can use to help us rebuild our food culture. What I mean is re-establishing traditional eating habits like sit-down breakfasts, family dinners and desserts as special occasion food.

    “Not only is this more simple than dieting, it is also a lot more fun. But it is also a fundamental change in how we live our lives. It will take some initial effort to make the change, but once new habits are established sticking with it becomes second nature.”

  • 14 Comments »

    1.
    January 11, 2010
    2:51 am

    American uncle of mine a pathologist took part in a study years ago with some Heart Foundation and one of the things they looked at was the relatively low incidence of heart attack in China despite the fact they cook everything with palm oil (v. nasty source of bad cholesterol) and smoke like chimneys. Apparently one of the factors alleviating these two killer signs was the Chinese affinity for green tea, which is full of substances called flavinoids, which apparently line the arteries with a slippery coating, that prevents or inhibits plaque formation. There y’go me tuppence ha’porth being a coffee drinker never touch the stuff well only Barry’s Gold Label which is the champagne of tea imo

    Comment by kynos
    2.
    January 11, 2010
    3:23 am

    I have yet to see a diet that tells people that if they consume less calories than they burn off every day they will start losing weight.

    But then they wouldn’t make money by appealing to peoples common sense.

    Comment by Toronto Icarus
    3.
    January 11, 2010
    11:12 am

    “I have yet to see a diet that tells people that if they consume less calories than they burn off every day they will start losing weight.”
    Toronto Icarus that is exactly what Weight Watchers say. Ive been a member for nine months now and have reached my goal weight, having lost two stone. Its not diets that fail, its people!

    Comment by claire
    4.
    January 11, 2010
    11:30 am

    Toronto Icarus I think your comment is a little glib. Weight Watchers as claire commented as well as GI and other “diets” claim exactly that and promote balanced, varied diets full of fresh fruit and veg, lean meat etc. The problem is some people see diet as equating to short term whereas GI, Weight Watchers encourage people to learn healthy, life long eating habits.

    Comment by Mo
    5.
    January 11, 2010
    12:22 pm

    If you burn off more calories than you consume, wouldn’t you, well, die? You are supposed to consume *some* calories to stay alive. An adult should be eating 2,000 calories day…walking briskly for an hour will burn off around 300. How are you supposed to burn off more than you eat? Athletes who train all day will eat a lot more calories than an average person with a mostly sedentary life (the Olympic swimmer Michael Phelps famously had 12,000 a day while training). There’s a huge amount of confusion around diets and nutrition, and I think it’s largely down to the diet industry – it’s not in their interest for people to properly understand this stuff.

    Comment by jean
    6.
    January 11, 2010
    1:19 pm

    Just on the article Conor, you should refer to Dietitians, not nutritionists. The former is a trained professional who has to earn their qualifications and accreditation, the latter is generally a quack.

    I don’t think Toronto Icarus said you should permanently burn off more energy than you consume now did he/she? Just that that is how you lose weight, which is correct.

    What is supposed to happen is that your body looks for you to provide the energy it needs and will dip into your fat reserves if required. By controlling calorie intake and being active you can make your body dip into the fat reserve. If you don’t keep up an active regime your body will simply replace the fat reserve at the earliest opportunity. If you do keep up an active regime your body will reach an efficient equilibrium where all of your calorie intake is used and, if necessary, your body will tell your brain to tell you to eat more if there’s an energy shortfall. If you are starving yourself and the fat reserves are depleted then your body will turn to your muscles for energy – a very bad thing.

    Jean, the mere fact of being alive burns off calories. That 300 from a good walk should be enough to ultimately bring you to equilibrium, unless you then eat a couple of choc bars when you get home.

    Nutrition, in terms of weight loss / gain is not hard to understand at all – food with sugar and fat have more calories by weight than lean meats and vegetables. If you consume more calories than you use (i.e. you’re sedentary) you will get fatter. It is easy to find out the calorie content of most foods. Everything else is guff.

    Comment by dealga
    7.
    January 11, 2010
    1:28 pm

    “If you burn off more calories than you consume, wouldn’t you, well, die? You are supposed to consume *some* calories to stay alive.” Yes, but that applies for a perosn not trying to lose weight. Athletes train all day, so they need more calories. Even Michael Phelps gained weight after the Olympics.

    Comment by claire
    8.
    January 11, 2010
    2:54 pm

    ‘that is exactly what Weight Watchers say’…. then I take it back. Someone is sending out the right message.

    its not diets that fail, its people … Absolutely. And a significant number of them fall for whatever is the latest diet that will guarantee they lose weight. There’s been cabbage diets, egg diets ( I pity the partners), Atkins, Dr. Bernstein Every one of them seems like a money making grab.

    I think your comment is a little glib… well, i’m a cynic when it comes to diets and the people that make money off them Mo.

    If you burn off more calories than you consume, wouldn’t you, well, die… I’m assuming a certain level of intelligence here

    How are you supposed to burn off more than you eat…
    combination of smaller portions and exercise maybe. Its hardly rocket science is it?

    Comment by Toronto Icarus
    9.
    January 11, 2010
    3:55 pm

    A couple of years ago I heard Anne Widdecombe talking about losing weight. She said that she was going to write a diet book, and that it would have exactly two pages. On the first page it would say “Eat”, and then on the second page it was going to say “Less”.
    That’s the only way to go on a diet. All the other fads and “methods” are a load of rubbish.

    Comment by Jonathan
    10.
    January 11, 2010
    11:34 pm

    No, no…I’m not saying it’s not possible to lose weight and burn off calories…what I’m saying is that when commenters above spoke about burning off more calories than you eat, *that* doesn’t make any sense. A person at a healthy weight needs 2,000 calories a day, an overweight person should probably eat a bit less…but if you’re eating say 1,750 calories and attempting to burn it *all* off, you’ll make yourself sick. Eating less calories than you burn off is what anorexics do.

    Toronto Icarus – you’re right, it’s not rocket science! You’re the one who said you should burn off more calories than you eat… burning off excess calories is something different.

    Dealga – I know! Not my point at all.

    Claire – again, that was my point – I used Phelps as an example to show that people adjust their intake for their level of activity. Even a person trying to lose weight has to consume a certain amount of calories for nutrients and energy.

    Comment by jean
    11.
    January 12, 2010
    3:53 am

    Dealga,

    Please do not say that nutritionists are generally quacks. I have worked in development on public health issues where often the most effective and insightful people are qualified nutritionists. Malnutrition is a huge global problem and nutritionists are key to solving it. So go easy on the quacking about them.

    Patrick

    Bangkok

    Comment by Patrick Hennessy
    12.
    January 12, 2010
    11:48 am

    But who wants to look like Anne Widdecombe?

    Comment by claire
    13.
    January 13, 2010
    3:53 pm

    Claire,
    Using Anne Weddecombe’s diet method won’t actually make you look like her.

    Comment by Jonathan
    14.
    January 13, 2010
    5:49 pm

    What qualifications do the nutritionists you know have Patrick?

    To repeat – the term nutritionist has no legal protection, which means anyone can call themselves a nutritionist – you don’t need any qualification. You could call yourself one by the time you finish reading this and no one could stop you.

    To call yourself a Dietitian, on the other hand, requires academic qualifications and is a legally protected term.

    So are the people you are referring to really calling themselves nutritionists? Or did they win their degrees in a Christmas cracker?

    Whether you perceive these people to be helping ’solve malnutrition’ or not is irrelevant. I could do great work dishing out antibiotics to poor sick people. It doesn’t make me a doctor or a pharmacist. Being well-meaning doesn’t absolve one of quackery.

    Comment by dealga

    Leave a comment

    When submitted, your comment will be moderated and, once approved, will appear on the site.

    The Irish Times reserves the absolute right not to publish comments.


Search Pricewatch