Pricewatch

  • Is green energy worth it?

    October 13, 2009 @ 11:36 am | by Conor Pope

    A DISTRESSED reader contacted us recently after enduring two years of heartache with a wood pellet burner she had installed in her Mayo home.

    Filled with the best of intentions when she was building her house, she decided to use a renewable energy source for her heating and was convinced by a salesman that a wood pellet burner was the way to go. The cost of the burner was €8,000 but a grant of just under €4,000 from Sustainable Energy Ireland (SEI) under its “greener home” programme took the sting out of the bill.

    The greener homes deal gives grants to homeowners who install a renewable energy heating system such as solar panels, biomass stoves and boilers, and geothermal heat pumps. It has been a runaway success since it was introduced in 2006 with over 37,000 applications approved so far.

    It wasn’t all hunky-dory for our reader, however, and the problems started almost immediately after installation. The burner belched black smoke into her shed and consumed pellets at a ferocious rate – she was spending €150 a week on heating her 139sq m (1,500sq ft) house for just four hours a day, she says. The company which sold her the burner went out of business and the owner disappeared.

    To its credit, SEI intervened and at its request, the manufacturer came out and tweaked the system and declared it good to go. It wasn’t really. Our reader has had so many problems with it that she has given up – this week she will have the burner pulled out in favour of an oil-fired system.

    It’s a story of our times. The National Consumer Agency has received scores of complaints from members of the public in relation to wood pellet boilers with the majority focusing on poor installation or faulty boilers.

    SEI says complaints about renewable energy systems are low but stresses that consumers need to research before they throw money – their own and the taxpayers’ – on technology which may not be right for them. It says people need to know what the running costs will be, they need to get a number of quotes from registered suppliers, check references and get a detailed contract in place. It is simple, sound advice.

    People, concerned about the environment and the rising cost of energy, have sought to insulate themselves against future bills by investing in renewable energy. While the grants have made the options more affordable, they have also attracted rogue traders keen to cash in. According to industry sources, ill-informed people are easy prey for cowboys who know almost as much about the systems they are selling as the hapless consumers they are bamboozling with pseudo eco-science.

    With proper research, however, investing in alternative energies can be a money saver. Wally Keogh lives in a 186sq m (2,000sq ft) house off the South Circular Road in Dublin and he has a good wood pellet boiler story. He had a system installed over two years ago. At a cost of €11,000 it wasn’t cheap but, Keogh says, “you get what you pay for”. “Gas prices were climbing at the time and oil is on the way out.”

    His burner came with a four tonne wood pellet reservoir which needs filling twice a year at a cost of €800 a time – €1,600 a year for all his heating and hot water. Keogh says that prior to installing the new system, he was spending €2,200 a year on home heating so the boiler is saving around €600 a year.

    He says the first year was “a bit of a learning curve, for myself and the boiler. It took a while for the boiler to work out how best to heat the zones in the house but we have had no problems since.”

    Journalist Catherine Cleary and her husband didn’t stop at installing a single renewable energy source in their house but took advantage of a recent big refurbishment to turn their home into one of the most energy efficient old houses in Dublin. They bought a near derelict property nearly three years ago and, as it had to be gutted and extensively rebuilt, the couple decided to convert it into a green house.

    “The first and least glamorous thing we did was insulation but it was probably the most important,” Cleary says. The attic was sealed, the walls were heavily insulated, the floors were layered with polystyrene and all the cracks and joints were taped up.

    “We were going to spend a lot of money on a geothermal pump but someone suggested that if we spent just some of that money on insulation instead, then we’d get by with a much more basic heating system,” says Cleary.

    A heat recovery system – which helps to filter stale air out of the well-sealed house – cost €4,500, and a water harvesting tank to take water from the gutters for use in clothes washing and toilet flushing was another €3,000. “That held up everything and there was no immediate pay-off, other than a smug green feeling,” Cleary says with a laugh. The solar panels cost €6,000 and the testing of the house for leaks and drafts was another €1,500.

    All told, the couple spent around €15,000 on insulation and renewables. A lot of money, certainly, but the savings were instant and enormous. The total cost of all their heating and hot water for the last 12 months – including some bitterly cold winter months – was €523, or just €1.40 a day. If they were burning oil the cost of heating their home and water for a year would be over €1,500.

    Eoin McMahon runs a small alternative energy business based in Waterford. He sells and installs a range of renewable energy options. While a lot of inquiries come in about wind power, many people are blown away by the upfront cost of high quality wind machines. Solar panels, which can be installed for around €4,000, are the most popular option, he says. “We’re talking between eight and 10 years before you see a financial payback but that is right now. No-one has a crystal ball and can tell you how much oil is going to cost in two or five years time and that is what it all hinges on.”

  • 6 Comments »

    1.
    October 13, 2009
    12:11 pm

    It a pity building standards are so low here, a house built to Swedish standards would probably not need a heating sytem at all.

    Comment by Liam
    2.
    October 13, 2009
    1:57 pm

    Green-voting cowboys

    The government has failed the consumer - and the serious professional - by creating a cowboy market. Part-time taxi men are currently doing home energy ratings as are estate agents and other vested interest groups. They don’t have to carry professional indemnity insurance so cannot be sued when they get it wrong.

    In a recent test, three SEI approved assessors returned widely differing energy ratings for the same house.

    There is also NO standard of competence that has to be attained before you get accredited as an SEI listed installer of “Green Energy” products and avail of government “Green Energy” grants.

    The same attitude that prevailed with Fás expenses also applies to Green Energy grants, and the fraudsters are dipping their greedy hands into the taxpayer’s pockets with the connivance of government.

    The minister responsible, Eamonn Ryan, appears to be more concerned with creating a market for “greenwash”, for appearing to be green, than he is in reducing anyone’s energy bills. His grants system deliberately excludes any requirement for independent assessment or prediction of payback period.

    But it is not just an issue of fleecing unsuspecting consumers; there are issues of health and life at stake with some of these systems. Carbon monoxide (resulting from incorrectly installed boilers) kills as does legionela bacteria (found in solar heated water).

    The rainwater harvesting system you mentioned is banned in the Dublin City Council functional area because of concerns over possible drinking water contamination. In other words the government promotes a technology, give free reign for cowboys to invade the market and put the knowledgeable suppliers out of business and then the local authority bans it because it sees that allowing cowboys to install new technology will lead to deaths. Joined-up government how are ya.

    Extra insulation is absolutely the best place to put money but adding insulation to an existing house can create dangerous conditions for the growth of dry rot if sufficient care is not taken to avoid interstitial condensation associated with cold bridges. Houses will be demolished in this country (as they were in Canada) as a result of injudicious placing of insulation. And there will be no compensation.

    And it could all have been so different if a proper, consumer-focused and taxpayer friendly system of grants were put in place. It could even have be pain-free for the householder if a system of home upgrading loans repaid out of future energy savings had been adopted. The cost of upgrading to green homes could have been repaid by retaining current heating bills for a period of years until the accrued savings paid off the refurbishment loans.

    But that might have required professional oversight to ensure that householders didn’t throw taxpayers money away on employing green-voting cowboys.

    Comment by Simon McGuinness, Architect.
    3.
    October 13, 2009
    8:30 pm

    Heating? What’s that?

    Comment by PassiveHouseOwner
    4.
    October 13, 2009
    10:22 pm

    Green energy is all ok but we should also be thinking about the price of production of the items we have inside our nice new homes.

    Comment by Jim
    5.
    October 19, 2009
    12:13 pm

    —success story—(look away now if you you are likely to find a “happy ending” too disturbing!)

    I have a modern 4-bed semi recently extended to a 6-bed (about 250sq m). I had the entire ground floor concrete slab removed and relaid with underfloor heating (UFH) and an air to water heat pump installed to heat the UFH and conventional radiators upstairs. The SEI grant helped (a little!) Also I had very high specification insulation and triple glazing throughout. Am very happy with the outcome: house is warm all day and has lower running costs than the gas it replaced in the pre-extension house. The heating contractor (and their suppliers) were excellent.

    Comment by Colm
    6.
    November 11, 2009
    4:54 pm

    Slightly off Key, why will the electricity board not buy unused electricity from windmills etc? With tried and tested (for decades) meter technology in most other European countries?

    Comment by David

    Leave a comment


    • (will not be published)


Search Pricewatch

 
Close
E-mail It