Election count goes on … and on …
@ 1:54 pm | by Shane Hegarty
No matter how much some of us love the count, there must be a sizeable number out there who find the whole thing utterly tedious. Who can’t bear hearing 43 tally counts in the morning, and another 43 at lunchtime, and then confirmation of what we already when we get the first rounds of vote counts.
There must be people who woke up this morning, heard the exit poll and immediately decided that the “tightest election in decades” (passim, all media) is actually an anti-climax. And now they’ll have to spend the rest of the day, and weekend, looking for an alternative to the wall-to-wall coverage of the thing.
The tallymen might get a kick out of the process, but I never found that indulging them in their fetish shold have been one of the factors in dumping the e-voting idea. With a decent computer-based count, we’d probably be well into the results by now (only 6 seats announced so far). But getting a decent computer was the problem in the first place, and why anyone without the geeky obsession with election counts is going to find their patience tested to the limit over the next 24 hours.