• -
  • irishtimes.com - Posted: July 9, 2008 @ 9:37 am

    Bad Day in the Life of Two Brians

    Deaglán de Bréadún

    Brian Cowen has two political modes: combative and perfunctory. When in combat mode, he is invincible, smiting the foe to the left and to the right of him. Whether it goes down well on television is a moot point, but he clearly revels in the heat of battle.

    He was in perfunctory mode yesterday. The delivery of his speech at the announcement of the list of government cutbacks can only be described as listless and pedestrian. This was not a happy occasion for him and he must wonder when the nightmare is going to end. You wait for years and years to become Taoiseach and then, only two months into the job, you suffer the indignity of defeat in an important EU referendum following which the economy goes pear-shaped.

    The Government Press Centre was like “Woodstock for Journalists” yesterday afternoon. Correspondents and specialists of every stripe were in attendance: medical, industrial, political and of course economic. This was a Big Occasion: one is tempted to say historic. The Celtic Tiger has a very nasty thorn in its paw and damned if anyone knows how to extract it without inflicting great pain.

    When the two Brians took the stage, the senior one left it to his junior – Minister for Finance Brian Lenihan – to give the detail of the cuts. Lenihan’s delivery was more animated and, unlike his boss, he did not convey a strong sense of wanting to be somewhere else. But it can’t have been a happy day for him either. Maybe Micheál Martin and Dermot Ahern were lucky after all not to get the Finance job.

    Parallels are being drawn with the time Charles J. Haughey went on national television on 9 January 1980 to warn the people in grave tones that, “As a community we are away beyond our means … We will have to cut down on government spending.”

    But it would be several years before Haughey implemented the programme of economic stringency he promised that night. Cowen and Lenihan, for their part, have outlined a set of measures supposedly intended to restore the economy to its former glory.

    Chief among them is a pledge to cut the public service payroll – theoretically excluding Health and Education – by three per cent. There was a paucity of detail as to how this tough-sounding measure would be implemented in practice. The Government had talked the talk, but would it walk the walk? And was this the only way to go about it: what about the wide-boys and speculators who pay minimal tax while most people rest are caught in the PAYE trap?

    Government cutbacks after a period of high spending are a familiar scenario: we have been here before and I can still see Ray MacSharry’s hands shaking as he told the Dáil about impending drastic cutbacks in his March 1987 budget speech. But as yesterday’s set-piece drama played itself out, the tom-toms were beating out the story of a worrying ancillary development, namely, the vertigo-inducing fall in Irish bank shares on the stock market. Can we stop the movie now please: it’s getting a little too scary.

    #Deaglán de Bréadún, Political Correspondent, The Irish Times, is author of The Far Side of Revenge: Making Peace in Northern Ireland, recently published in a second edition by Collins Press, Cork (www.collinspress.ie)

    • B'dum says:

      I’m sure they won’t actually attempt to manage the health service properly, so presumably they’re gonna shut some places or something?
      Roscommon hospital’s death has been going on for ages now, would this be its death knell?

    • Dan Sullivan says:

      An interesting outcome of the idea of a 3% reduction, cut, saving, whatever the terminology is in pay roll costs for the public sector is that the more the public sector seeks and gets in terms of a pay rise the more people that will have to go in order to afford it. If we had 100 people working on the same salary and wanted a 3% then 3 of them have to go but decide to pay the remaining 97 more and someone else has to walk the plank to allow the others their rise. Which is it to be for the public sector unions, pay rises or job security for their fellow workers?

    • Sean R says:

      Cowen and FF more generally must be wishing they held off dumping Ahern. Now twice in my adult life FF has led this country into economic difficulties because the underlying fundamentals are not understood nor addressed. Presently, it seems like Cowen et al are like deer stuck in the headlights of an oncoming truck. I don’t take pleasure in it, but it does seem to indicate they don’t understand how/why the boom appeared, how it could be managed, and why it seems to have ended for the moment. The drip-feed of bad news also alarms me, because it indicates they do not have a firm grasp on the situation. Mind you, having a grasp and doing something are not the same thing either… and your comment about Haughey reminded me of his political shenanigans in opposition, which were appalling. While Haughey went on TV and looked us all in the eye in a Charvet shirt, there was a whole lot of political manoeuvring that left Ireland on the brink. The situation was dire by the time he took matters in hand, but he could have adopted a Tallaght-like stategy, but did not. While Haughey played politics with our poverty, Ahern played politics with our excess. I find myself asking where has all the money gone – it is not a flippant remark – but a call to analyze how our boom has been squandered.It requires more than the govt singing “oops we did it again!”


Search Politics