• RSS
  • Text Size:
  • -
  • irishtimes.com - Posted: February 9, 2010 @ 10:25 pm

    Why isn’t George Lee a hero?

    Bryan

    George Lee speaking outside Leinster House yesterday, following his resignation from both the Dáil and Fine Gael. Photograph: Eric Luke

    George Lee speaking outside Leinster House yesterday, following his resignation from both the Dáil and Fine Gael. Photograph: Eric Luke.

    It pains me to think of myself as jumping onto the George Lee bandwagon, but jump on it I shall. Actually, I’m not really jumping on the bandwagon. I don’t have very much to add to the matter in terms of socio-political analysis or insight. All I have is a question. Simply, why isn’t the guy a hero?

    The ‘I went into politics to serve my country/so that I could look my grandkids in the eye’ was a bit much. It sounded like a politician doing what just about all politicians do – trying to look better than they really are. And let’s face it, a celebrity economist is no more likely to know how to sort out the country’s economic difficulties than all the other economists advising and working within the political process. In that respect, I can understand why so many people feel that Lee should have behaved like other elected officials and just got on with the job he signed up for, regardless of how difficult it may have been to get his ideas across.

    Still, here is an individual who, having spent less than a year on the job, has decided that the main opposition party just isn’t serious, and is walking away. Call it throwing toys out of a cot if you want, but I’m really impressed. Non-compliance with systems and institutions that don’t work is, in my opinion, very definitely the way to go. Which is why I’m confused. The average person distrusts most politicians, the political establishment and its culture. Yet when a George Lee rejects that culture, when he decides that it is better to walk away from it all than to continue to legitimate it, to perpetuate the idea that the slogans, speeches and images that go around at election time bear any resemblance to the reality of post-election political life, he is accused of being a mollycoddled, cowardly civil servant. All of a sudden, the status quo politicians are rugged, powerful, stouthearted Greek gods, while Lee and others of his ilk, most notably (for some reason) civil servants, are pathetic specimens who don’t belong anywhere near the reigns of public office.

    In Understanding Power, Noam Chomsky suggests that a rough environment will produce a rough political class because only they will be able to survive and hang around long enough to make it to the top. That’s not to imply that Ireland necessarily has a ‘rough’ political climate, but it obviously has one which is not conducive to the likes of Lee. And maybe that explains why so many incredibly able people here shun politics as a profession.

    Which brings me back to my initial question: why isn’t Lee a hero? Why, at the very least, isn’t the country panicked? If his election in any way represented a desire to see capable people from outside the political class given the opportunity to help sort out the country, why isn’t his failure to do that ominous? Doesn’t it mean that only the sort of person who can accommodate or tolerate the political system as it currently stands can hold elected office for any significant period of time?

    Turning on Lee, from where I stand, looks like an endorsement by the ruled, of the idea that they don’t belong in their rulers’ courts.

  • 27 Comments

    1.
    February 10, 2010
    12:18 am

    There isn’t anything heroic in leaving a job which requires real hard work, compromise, dedication and personal sacrafice and returning to a post where you get paid €160k plus p.a. for commentating on what other people do.

    Comment by Observer
    2.
    February 10, 2010
    12:57 am

    Unless of course, that post to which he is returning also requires ‘real hard work, compromise, dedication and personal sacrifice’. Unless turning down a place on the opposition’s front bench and probably a cabinet post after the next general election on principle counts as personal sacrifice. And unless the perks of being a front bench opposition ‘leader’ (and again we can reasonably assume, a cabinet minister soon) are worth much more than €160k. Unless any of the above are true to any degree, you’re right Observer.

    Comment by Bryan
    3.
    February 10, 2010
    12:58 am

    George is no hero because, firstly the general public don’t believe that nine months is long enough to have tested the whole political system. Secondly they feel the whole thing smacks of ego getting in the way of hard graft. Thirdly if George had to go back into the job market and wonder he will put food on the table we might start to believe him, but the return to RTE just before his leave of absence expires taints the whole martyr aura that he is trying to surround himself with.
    That said, he will of course have his supporters, those who really believe that he would have produced the magic economic formula if only Enda Kenny had asked him. These same people are also likely to think that he was the only economist in Fine Gael or even the country for that matter, and have failed to realise that there other less publicised economists who are better qualified and whose opinions are just as valid.
    No doubt, now that the contraints of FG have been lifted from him I can look forward to hearing the great economic policy statement that wells up inside him waiting to be released.
    Go on George if you’re reading this tell us, tell us how we can save ourselves. Tell us what all the other commentators have missed. Enda would’nt listen but we ,your adoring public, will !

    Comment by Kieran Fitzpatrick
    4.
    February 10, 2010
    2:31 am

    Bryan,

    George Lee probably wouldnt remember when we had intellectuals like Justin Keating, CC O’Brien, Garret Fitzgerald and others who joined the Dail to help the country back 30 years ago. While they were intellectual power houses and held many good innovative ideas only Garret really stayed the course.

    The reason comes back to the parish pump. A recent study, by the Committee on the Constitution, found that on average TDs spend more than half their time on constituency activity and less than 40 per cent on legislative work.( IT a few weeks ago)

    Why this over 50% of time on constituency work? The need to be reelected. What is this constituency work? In general banal one off requests for a new road, a community center, a school. It has no national impact whatsoever.

    One comment I read from Enda was the challenge someone like George Lee would have in responding to the grind of constituency politics. He was obviously talking about parish pump stuff.

    Our TD’s are being paid to help frame economic, social, etc legislation for the country but they spend over 50% of their time on constituency work to ensure they stay in power.

    This is why so many talented people will not go into politics.

    The Irish TD has replaced his/her county councillor and acts like some type of gofer for every disenchanted loud mouthed member of his/her constituency. As a result running the country is a part time job for the members of Dail Eireann.

    The Irish TD is too close rather than too far from his/her constituents.Constituency size should be doubled and numbers of TD’s should be halved. County Councils and local government should be empowered and elected TD’s should devote themselves 100% to running the country through work in the Dail.

    I am surprised George did not know this before he joined.

    The best he can do now is to devote his energy to Dail reform. If we do not get this we are condemned to a dismal future. It may be less urgent than economic recovery but it is vastly more important for the future of the country.

    George Lee is a hero if he turn his fast exit into a national debate on this.

    Patrick
    Bangkok

    Comment by Patrick Hennessy
    5.
    February 10, 2010
    10:25 am

    The thing that is so striking to me about this whole conversation around George Lee is the idea that someone who blasted their way into politics should automatically have to “wait their turn”. There doesn’t seem to be much room in the Irish system for “Young Turks”. Looking at the US, for example, seniority is very important within the Congress, and especially within the Senate. However, there have been moments when newbies have been able to really turn the agenda of the major parties, and put themselves in real positions of power. Right-wing Republicans did this in the 1990s, and Rahm Emanuel was able to vault himself to the upper echelons of the Democratic party leadership by his successful strategizing that led the Democrats to capture the House in the 2006 elections.

    On the other hand, it’s not clear to me that Lee offered a real political agenda, one that would garner public support, and that would legitimate his claims to have more “say” within the party. Given his apparent popularity, had he crafted a real alternative agenda, perhaps he could have led a backbencher revolt (especially given his claims of murmuring). I don’t see 9 months as nearly enough time for anyone to turn a hidebound institution on its head, much less lead a revolt from the inside. Maybe Lee’s departure from the Dail would seem more noble if it was obvious that he really had tried to change the direction of the party, and of politics in general, but from what I’ve read, I don’t get that sense at all.

    Comment by Erica
    6.
    February 10, 2010
    12:03 pm

    It is never a good thing when a journalist becomes a story. When Lee was a operating journalist, this happened to often. A good journalist should not have a character on gift grub. The story inevitably becomes about them and then their egos.
    I think that Lee has done the state a disservice by his quitting. Surely change from the inside is better than from the outside.
    The parish pump system, the political apprenticeship has not grown up over night. Surely Lee as an experienced journalist should know this. If he should have done anything, he should have campaigned for a list system of election, where policy rather than patronage or personality would elect us a government.
    What I liked about the Green Party before the last election is that I thought that I knew what they stood for , not what they were against. Unfortunately this has been blurred by their performance in Government. A list system could allow the brightest and best come through although that is also not beyond corruption.

    Comment by John McCarthy
    7.
    February 10, 2010
    12:51 pm

    “Unless of course, that post to which he is returning also requires ‘real hard work, compromise, dedication and personal sacrifice’.”

    Surely:

    “Unless of course, that post to which he is returning also requires ‘real hard work, compromise, dedication and personal sacrifice’ say, for example in the Irish Times, instead of RTE.”

    Dontcha love that dry Tara Street humour.

    Comment by Chuck E
    8.
    February 10, 2010
    1:15 pm

    George Lee betrayed his mandate to fight for new policies and politics. It matters not a jot that Lee learnt that Fine Gael is a shell of a political party, if his response is simply to run away from the political challenge and scurry back to the ivory towers of Belfield.
    Unfortunately, this whole debacle shows that celebrity economists (and quick fixes) are a distraction. We need a robust challenge to the insipid political class that inhabits the panorama of Ireland’s political establishment – from the miserly Greens to the lillyputian Labour Party. We need real arguments and new politicians prepared to fight for ideas to inspire the public. Lee proved he is as bereft of vision and conviction as the rest of our political class.

    Comment by Steve Daley
    9.
    February 10, 2010
    1:28 pm

    “And maybe that explains why so many incredibly able people here shun politics as a profession.”

    I don’t think there’s any maybe about it Bryan, this is the way politics works in this country. All politicians are interested in is re-election and parish politics is the result. There are far too few focusing on the bigger picture hence the squandering of the benefits accrued over the last 15 years.

    Lee was right to walk away, he obviously took a look araound saw it for what it is and said no thanks. Only leaves one question – surely he should have known this was the status quo in the first place?

    Comment by Darragh
    10.
    February 10, 2010
    5:37 pm

    as said by previous posters; the job takes a lot of hard work, effort etc. It seems to me that George Lee is so used to his job being handed to him on a plate. Being a TD meant he had to fight for his corner and wasn’t going to get mollycoddled and he couldn’t handle it. I know most of us probably couldn’t do the job but at least we realise this and don’t get ourselves elected in the first place. He has let down a huge amount of people that voted for him. By the way I don’t agree that he should be permitted to return to his old job @ RTE; he has a legal right to return to RTE (otherwise they could face an employment tribunal), but in a far less paid job. Also, funny about the study saying TDs spend so much time in their constituencies, the TDs for this area are never around, or do they answer emails, phonecalls etc.

    Comment by Caitriona
    11.
    February 10, 2010
    9:10 pm

    I think Goerge Lee should be commended for walking away. It musn’t have been an easy decision, he could have stayed there and continued on sitting back doing nothing and getting very well paid. He made a choice, a brave one. Perhaps we should be looking at the bigger picture. What is going on within Fine Gael, we all know that Enda doesn’t have what it takes to run the country if he did he would have been elected the last election. George Lee is a hero one with morals, so what if he returns to RTE. Is one not allowed to make a choice any more. We listened every night to his commentry when the recession hit. Maybe its time we listened again.

    Comment by Regina O Dwyer
    12.
    February 10, 2010
    10:16 pm

    Trust us, the Irish to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory and turn someone actually standing for principle over politicians and their blather into a disingenuous crybaby.

    How the politicians became the good guys in this fiasco can be explained in much the same way as can be the transformation of our vibrant economy of the late 90’s into the decaying wreck we have today.

    Bravo Ireland, we’re consistent if nothing else :)

    Comment by Cian
    13.
    February 11, 2010
    12:04 am

    Ah sure he is really. One of those who also serve.

    Comment by Kynos
    14.
    February 11, 2010
    2:08 am

    The truth is, that no matter how talented an individual is in Ireland we operate a closed shop feudal type society and the likes of Lee was not going to usurp the Fine Gael clique so easily. Isn’t it amazing how so many Irish people’s talents go unrecognised in Ireland and are thought so highly of abroad?

    Comment by Neil
    15.
    February 11, 2010
    3:29 am

    I think that calling G Lee a hero for reseigning after such a short stay in politics would be excessive. Heros should do something out of the ordinary during their political careers or bring about something extraordinary with their resignation. George Lee cannot claim to have done either.

    His decision was at best made in the hope that it would bring about systematic change. If he felt that reform was not possible from the inside and given the general reaction to his resignation, the politicians who can bring about these reforms will be under no extra pressure to do so now than they were when Lee was there. There will be no lasting positive legacy.

    So forced him to resort to resignation as a tool for change?
    Erica’s point about an absense of clear political philosophy could well be true but it is what prevents politicians of a non traditional ilk from making progress or from testing their philosophy which is most interesting. For this I think Erica and Patrick have summed things up nicely.

    But to repeat the real heroic politician would change all of this either from the inside or through his resignation. George will be judged to have done neither.

    (The RTE business is not a major issue in my book, given that most rational beings would have weighed things up the same way as he did. Bear in mind also that G Lee would not have much difficulty finding employment similar to that RTE post, if the latter was no longer available to him.)

    Comment by michaelstrasb
    16.
    February 11, 2010
    12:45 pm

    “Non-compliance with systems and institutions that don’t work is, in my opinion, very definitely the way to go.”

    Perhaps, but surely there is a better chance of changing the system from within? Maybe not within FG but within the political system. Non-compliance within the Dail would be quite something, a spot of filibustering might do the trick. Is walking away really the same as non-compliance? If we all keep turning away, nothing will change.

    Comment by Elatha
    17.
    February 11, 2010
    1:58 pm

    Country won’t panic over anything unless it directly affects the euro in the pocket agus an súicre insan tae. That much is clear to me now.

    Comment by Kynos
    18.
    February 11, 2010
    1:58 pm

    Yirrah why would you want the country to panic anyway? What good did panic ever do?

    Comment by Kynos
    19.
    February 11, 2010
    4:57 pm

    George Lee has clearly being found out as an intellectual lightweight and has run home to the safety of RTE. How can we trust anything these cosseted journalists say?

    Comment by Hugh
    20.
    February 11, 2010
    5:28 pm

    George isn’t a hero because George didn’t do or even try to do the things he said he would.

    What are the policies that he wished to advocate? What was it exactly that he was trying to do and was prevented from doing? He reminds me of one of those people who talks about “shaking things up” and “keeping it real” but he can never explain what any of that means.

    Comment by Dan Sullivan
    21.
    February 11, 2010
    8:23 pm

    I’ll be interested in his journalistic style and whether it displays any marked or subtle changes. Must get a tv licence. Must get a tv. Think I’ll try me one of those Elegatos. But then there’s always RTE’s website don’t need a tv licence for that though you don’t use it like people use telly. Having it on all the time and half-consciously watching all sorts of shite and the odd not-half-bad thing all mixed up together while doing other stuff at the same time. Or as an old man once said when he saw a guy driving his car and kissing a girl in the passenger seat “he’s doing two things badly at the same time”. Hope now that George’s put his political career behind him, as it seems, he’ll be able to do just the one thing well which is report on the wa..on politics as it is fought. All Big Boy stuff these days. Small man better get out of the way when the elephants dance the chickens should be nervous. Gorilla Dayz in Ireland. Needs plenty of war reporting. At least if we can keep an eye on them we can try to take our own protective measures. Such as getting our passports renewed if necessary now and not waiting a month longer.

    Comment by kynos
    22.
    February 11, 2010
    9:42 pm

    You always make me laugh, kynos…whether you mean to or not…good to have you back wherever you’ve been…like ‘the doing two things badly’ story

    Comment by Blimey O'Riley
    23.
    February 12, 2010
    1:36 am

    “He’s doing two IMPORTANT things badly at the same time.” What the old man actually said got it wrong the first time anyway thanks for the good word Blimey I’m usually hanging around here like some ancient marinade at a wedding party scaring the guests quantum of solace if I cheer one or two up intentionally or otherwise

    Comment by kynos
    24.
    February 12, 2010
    2:55 pm

    Best article I have read about George Lee. He did what a lot of us do not have the balls to do. I was not shocked at his departure but I was shocked at the ridicule he got which he did not deserve. Something needs to be done now and fast. One person will not make a difference and the result for OUR collective cowardice, well we are ALL going to hell in a handcart!
    At least we’ll have each other…..

    Comment by ShelleyB
    25.
    February 12, 2010
    5:07 pm

    Lest we not forget FG went looking for George.
    Did they approach him simply because they were short of back-bench ineffective TDs? Of course not.
    He was recruited because of what he brought and what he would bring as an economist who was at once intellectual but had also proved that he had connected with the public which explains his 27,000 vote return.
    The fact of the matter is that bright lights cast long shadows and George Lee overshadowed both Kenny and Bruton in both economic intellect and charisma. They of course knew this and decided to park him on the bench. Enda Kenny is utterly unelectable as a Taoiseach yet FG continue to entertain his bungling, ineffectual leadership whilst watching a man who could have led them to power walk away. We need more George Lee’s

    Comment by derek
    26.
    February 13, 2010
    12:49 pm

    @25 cf Bambi and Bobby and the ‘Mo’ factor!

    Comment by Blimey O'Riley
    27.
    February 15, 2010
    2:23 pm

    A study of what keeps Enda as leader of Fine Gael and what led George to quit would both throw light on the state of politics in ireland.

    Enda, a man who would’nt know how to rock a boat in a raging sea, is succesfull precisly due to his mediocrity. In lacking passion and vision he is the perfect “safe pair of hands”. Politicians who turn around countries are driven and visionary. Enda is neither. But he is a very “nice” man and sadly in todays political class in Ireland thats all thats needed to get to the top.

    George is driven. He is a threat. He would probably kick ass within the party if allowed a foothold. He might even god forbid break ranks occasionally and say what he thinks rather than what the party thinks. Dangerous, so no room at the inn.

    But what continues to niggle me is that his departure shows he did’nt know the game he was getting into. For a journalist of his calibre that is quite disturbing and leaves me with quite a big question mark over either his level of self-awareness or his judgement, or both.

    Patrick

    Bangkok

    Comment by Patrick Hennessy

    Comments on this article are now closed.


Search outsidein