• RSS
  • Text Size:
  • -
  • irishtimes.com - Posted: July 29, 2010 @ 10:07 am

    And you thought they didn’t make ‘em like this anymore?

    Jim Carroll

    Over the last few weeks, regular chuckles have been provided by reviews of the new album from Richard Ashcroft & The United Nations of Sound. With one or two exceptions (Brian Boyd in our place, for instance), the album has received the kind of kicking usually reserved for your very worst enemy or local Fianna Fail hack. Just even take a look-see at the pull-out quotes which Any Decent Music have gathered from reviews of the album and have a giggle. The consensus is that it’s a dog of a record.

    Surely, says OTR, it can’t be that bad. Surely, thinks OTR, Ashcroft is getting it in the neck for other reasons (people don’t like his hair or something). Surely, wonders OTR, this album which has received the full promotional nine yards from the record label must have some redeeming qualities.

    Sweet suffering Jaysus, that’s an hour of my life I will never get back. It’s easily one of the most hideous, unimaginative, unlistenable, pompous, overblown, grotesque albums I’ve ever had to endure and that includes most of The Cranberries’ back-catalogue. And let’s not even go anywhere near Ashcroft’s lyrics. I’m assuming well-regarded hip-hop producer No ID got paid handsomely for his efforts because he sure didn’t involve in this one for any musical reasons. What a turnip of an album.

    It reminds me that sometimes it’s worth listening to the wisdom of crowds. After all, if the massed gallery of reviewers give an album a good kicking, that’s worth taking to the bank. It’s not as if those critics did a Pitchfork and decided in advance what the review and rating was going to be – yes, I know many music fans think reviewers decide these things at some sort of annual dinner-dance but if they do, no-one has ever invited me along to said soiree.

    And it also works when the thumbs go up rather than down. One of the best reviewed albums right now on Any Decent Music is Janelle Monae’s fantastic record “The ArchAndroid”. With the exception of Mojo (I think the reviewer must have got the wrong CD), it’s rave after rave after rave, scoring mostly 8s, 9s and 10s. If you took this collective wisdom as a recommendation to buy the album, you’d probably be very happy with your purchase. Maybe – just maybe – we can trust some of the reviewers, right?

  • 31 Comments

    1.
    July 29, 2010
    10:37 am

    Granted, I haven’t listend to the album (nor do I have the inclination to) but if some of the lyrics I’ve seen jotted down are anything to go by, I’ll be giving it a wide berth. The word ‘cliched’ springs to mind.

    On a kind of related note, be it completely unrelated, but the new Arcade Fire album is a barnstormer. Really can’t stop listening to it, they’ve even had the audacity to stick one of their most poppiest tracks to date on there – ‘Sprawl II’. In short, its bootiful.

    Comment by ShowYourBones
    2.
    July 29, 2010
    10:41 am

    i think the opposite can sometimes be true – if a record has been getting rave reviews all round, the next reviewer in line may be a bit scared of going against the grain and slagging it, for fear of looking silly or ‘not getting it’ or whatever. so you end up with a sheep mentality. only sometimes, mind you.

    Comment by daniel
    3.
    July 29, 2010
    10:44 am

    daniel – interesting – give us an example please

    ShowYourBones – trust me, “cliched” is just one of several words you can use. Am looking fwd to hearing the Arcade Fire album – once the label decide to give me a copy (or do they want me to go to Rapidshare and get it there?)

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    4.
    July 29, 2010
    10:56 am

    So you’re saying trus most of the reviewers most of the time and Brian Boyd cannot be trusted…? Oh dear.

    But Jim how can you review it unless you review all the 8 versions with their near exactly matching covers?

    Re: Arcade Fire: Sprawl II is good, album is good, I’m happy with it. I think I’ll even buy it! Maybe they’re trying to make reviewers redundant…

    Comment by Major Alfonso
    5.
    July 29, 2010
    11:01 am

    In the latest Mojo Arcade Fires album got a glowing review while at the same time bashing Neon Bible, but I remember Neon Bible got the same glowing review that this new one did 3 years ago. It might even have got one of those “Instant Classic” stickers that Mojo like to give out. Two different reviewers I know but still, new album reviews can be pretty worthless. First impressions aren’t always lasting.

    Comment by Peter81
    6.
    July 29, 2010
    11:01 am

    From my pretty much armchair position, I think it can take a few listens to ‘get’ an album. The likes of Animal Collective, Grizzly bear and Beach House immediately spring to mind. If reviewers are in a rush to meet a deadline and have to get a 200 words review done asap, would they give the review their own personal touch, or just brush over the fact that blogs love them, so lets just give it an 8/10?

    It took me about four listens to appreciate Veckatimist last year, but I am glad I stuck to it. But all the reviews were glowing from the off for it, so would the reviewers have given it four listens? Doubt it.

    Janelle Monae’s album is great. Forced myself to listen to a few tracks from RPA and the nations of Sound (i think that is what it is called) and just found it terrible, but Richard Ashcroft has always been a pretentious dick hasn’t he? I never liked the Verve, and i was never going to like him. But I do like reading the bashings…..

    Comment by Eoghan
    7.
    July 29, 2010
    11:02 am

    Major – I’ve said nothing of the sort! Just pointing out how the reviews stack up. As for Arcade Fire and their 8 album sleeves, I’d just be happy with one copy or legal stream but sadly, the label are not playing ball – only selected reviewers are getting the album, though the words “Arcade Fire” “Suburbs” and “Rapidshare” come to mind – so i’ll reserve judgement until it’s released.

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    8.
    July 29, 2010
    11:05 am

    example of sheep mentality is surely Be Here Now by Oasis. Critics were wrongfooted by the public buying ‘Morning Glory’ by the shipload, despite a lukewarm reaction from most who just said it was ‘more of the same’. In 1995, ‘more of the same’ was just what the doctor ordered. Cut to 1997, the hype machine springs to life and a hell of a lot of critics went straight out with the five star review. Of course, once you let BHN settle, you can see the coke-muddled over produced mess that it is.

    Mind you, and I could get hung for saying this, in the same way that the Beatles did that stripped down ‘Let It Be’…I’d love to hear Be Here Now as 12, normal length songs, rather than the bloated mess that was served up. I do think there’s a few alright songs there somewhere!

    Comment by ivan
    9.
    July 29, 2010
    11:08 am

    Sprawl II is by no means a favourite, just drawing attention to the fact that it could easily sit top of the hit parade and one wouldn’t bat an eyelid. Rococo, City With No Children, Half Light II, We Used to Wait and Suburban War are standouts at the minute.

    But anyway, back to old RA, where did he think up the idea for United Nations of Sound? Must be hangin wif Rev and the Makers or summit. What on god’s earth is a United Nation of Sound?

    Comment by ShowYourBones
    10.
    July 29, 2010
    11:10 am

    Observer magazine had an interview with Ashcroft couple of weeks ago about the making of the album. If you are told so many times that you are great then you will believe it I suppose. They interviewed the producers and they basically admitted they’d never heard of him. The greatest thing that Ashcroft ever did was marry the girlfriend of Jason Pierce which enabled Pierce to produce the mighty Ladies and Gentlemen. Think I read somewhere that the Janelle Monae album has been the best reviewed album in the world this year. She has a good voice but owes a lot to Santogold me thinks.

    Comment by Feathers McGraw
    11.
    July 29, 2010
    11:12 am

    Jim I am guessing that the music industry is the same as the movie industry where the bigger magazines do deals to give movies 5/5, 10/10 etc. Have you not heard of this in the music industry?

    The editor/founder of the Sight & Sound mag said his last straw with Empire (or one of these big glossy mags) was that Peter Jackson refused to do an interview with the mag unless King Kong bought got and was the only movie with 5/5 in that edition. The reviews in S&S do not give ratings at all which is far more interesting in my opinion as i am guessing most people do not even bother to read most reviews of 1/5, 2/5 albums/movies etc.

    Comment by The G-Man
    12.
    July 29, 2010
    11:12 am

    Poor oul’ Ashcroft! Most unlike him to put out a piss-poor solo album. I mean, it’s not as if the last one was a piece of…. Oh no, wait. Like many things in life, I reckon it’s all The Rolling Stones’ fault. If they hadn’t sued the bejaysus out of The Verve for that bit of violin plagiarism at the start of ‘Bittersweet Symphony’, then he probably wouldn’t have to foist this unlistenable solo stuff upon us. How do Mick & Keef sleep at night?!?

    As for The Suburbs, it’s a hell of a lot better than I had been expecting. A few tracks too long in fairness, but there’s eatin’ and drinkin’ aplenty in it. ‘Deep Blue’ in particular has been stuck in my head for days now.

    Comment by theharro
    13.
    July 29, 2010
    11:14 am

    Daniel’s definitely right. There’s a lot of emporer’s new clothes going on with albums. Things that people were raving about a year ago hardly get a mention any more as they didn’t stand the test of time. i’d be surprised if most reviewers don’t come to an album with pre conceived notions, or have a quick google to see what someone else thinks before they start writing.

    Comment by Morgan Quinn
    14.
    July 29, 2010
    11:14 am

    @2 & 3 an example of the sheep mentality of reviewers is the fight like apes first album

    Comment by dp cooper
    15.
    July 29, 2010
    11:15 am

    There’s always going to be subjectivity in reviewing (as there is in everything in life!) and it depends on who is doing the reviewing in my opinion. If you trust a reviewer and the integrity, i suppose, of their musical tastes then you’ll be getting a good indication from a positive or negative or – a lot of the time! – in-between review of what to expect.

    To be honest i generally skim reviews unless something from the text really jumps out at me. I’ve often listened to albums that have blown me away and then gone off to read reviews. Some great reviews can be negative ones. Nothing like a bit schadenfreude of a weekday!

    Comment by Fergal
    16.
    July 29, 2010
    11:16 am

    i love the richard ashcroft album , it was either written by his kids or he wants to enter the eurovision song contest next year , NAH NAH NAH NAAAAAAAAAAAH NAH NAH NAH repeat for 4 days

    Comment by petee
    17.
    July 29, 2010
    11:19 am

    G-Man – I have NEVER heard of such a deal in the music business. Never came across it personally, at any rate. Perhaps it applies to publications which are dependant on ad revenue from the record labels? But surely any magazine worth its salt or credibility would never agree to sell editorial space or a good review or a cover in return for an ad?

    Feathers – I’d well believe the Monae album is the best reviewed one on the planet this year going by the Any Decent Music reviews. Santigold? Nah, dont see that.

    ShowYourBones – A United Nation of Sound is a catastrophe wrapped inside a fiasco locked into a disaster.

    ivan – bang on about Oasis – so many peeps got caught out

    Eoghan – good point. I try to listen to an album I’m reviewing at least 2 or 3 times but albums which sound good at first listen often dont last the pace while the opposite is also true

    Peter81 – I actually still quite like “Neon Bible”, I must admit. Not a patch on “Funeral”, mind you.

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    18.
    July 29, 2010
    11:24 am

    Not many music mags are worth much though Jim. Bring back Foggy Notions :( As a matter of interest what mags/publications (besides the Ticket of course!) do you regularly read?

    Major music stores fake charts (A store I will leave unmentioned had Madonna as No. 1 on the day the album was released) and shelving is paid for by big record companies all aimed at duping the customer into thinking their product is better. I feel this is similar ground. You could say that is because the store is selling but sure why does it matter what is no. 1 if it will sell anyways.

    Comment by The G-Man
    19.
    July 29, 2010
    11:30 am

    G-Man – currently: Mojo, The Stool Pigeon, Wired, NME, Spin and, now and then, Paste and The Word

    Ah, it’s different with music stores – that has always been the case, certainly Stateside anyway.

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    20.
    July 29, 2010
    11:34 am

    That’s interesting what you say about “selected reviewers”. Do labels normally send the album to particular journalists in bigger publications such as yourselves in order to try and secure an extra star? Usually, it’s fairly obvious who will be reviewing what. For instance, it’s hard to imagine you reviewing the latest Coldpay release while Tony Clayton-Lea takes care of the new Tame Impala album. But is this decided purely by the paper or does the label have input here? I’m not saying it’s wrong, I’m just curious about how the decision is made as to who reviews what.
    Excuse my naivety if what I’m asking has obvious answers.

    Comment by pmk
    21.
    July 29, 2010
    11:43 am

    pmk – there are no hard and fast rules about this either from labels or publications. How I find it works is that most labels know that certain reviewers are into certain stuff and not into other stuff so they usually tailor advance CDs to those hacks depending on what they have to send out. Others simply send CDs or streams to everyone. Other times, you’ll ask the labels for such and such a release because you’ve read or heard something about it. In the case of the big releases (say the new Coldplay or indeed Arcade Fire release) whoever is reviewing the album is the only one who will get the CD or steam in advance because the labels will be choosey about this (they’re fearful about leaks, though it’s quite obvious to everyone that it’s not hacks who are doing the leaking – in the case of Arcade Fire, it seems to have come from a record store). As for allocating reviews, it’s on a first-come basis – Tony is the reviews editor and we pitch reviews weekly to him. Most of the time, we each have fairly clearly defined areas so most of the time, there’s little crossover between what I might review and what Brian might review.

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    22.
    July 29, 2010
    2:24 pm

    Jim, your green wheelie bin must be stuffed each fortnight….

    Comment by Colette
    23.
    July 29, 2010
    2:32 pm

    Colette – stay away from my bin!

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    24.
    July 29, 2010
    3:38 pm

    The cast no shadow man himself in the latest Hot Press: He ponders 9/11 happening on his birthday: “When 9/11 happened, I was in France and I came back, and my mother-in-law had sent me a birthday card prior to going. It was a fold-out card with a black and white photo of the New York skyline pre-Twin Towers…. It’s the most world-shifting event.”
    To paraphrase Keith Olbermann speaking about Sarah Palin, ‘That man is an idiot!’

    Comment by John Hennessy
    25.
    July 29, 2010
    4:37 pm

    john – that’s well-known would-be-credible music mag Hot Press with Jedward on the cover, right?

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    26.
    July 29, 2010
    4:52 pm

    Now now Jim. You have the ‘choice’ of a Jedward cover or a ‘Snow Patrol’ one…

    Whoever is on the cover Ashcrofts monkeyman rambling is still the same.

    Comment by John Hennessy
    27.
    July 29, 2010
    5:57 pm

    @26 the whole ‘you decide’ hotpress cover thingy strikes me as an excuse to just put jedward on the cover and thus shift way more copies of hotpress to 14 year old girls

    Comment by dp cooper
    28.
    July 29, 2010
    6:00 pm

    dp – i think you need to credit 14 year old girls with more taste than that – they won’t be buying Hot Press

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    29.
    July 29, 2010
    6:56 pm

    The only album to get six stars in Uncut is Yoshimi battles the Pink Robots by the Flaming Lips – an album as awful as the title suggests.

    Comment by Brendan
    30.
    July 29, 2010
    7:58 pm

    Very odd-looking photo of Jedward on the cover of HP, all ”attitude” and the like. Weird. And why are they advertising drum cymbals in the news section? So odd.

    http://www.hotpress.com/Zildjian/news/Free-tshirt-and-drumsticks-when-you-purchase-any-Zildjian-cast-cymbal/6767899.html

    As for Ashcroft, he seems to have named his new project United Nations Of Sound without a hint of irony. Truly astonishing. I haven’t heard it but I suspect it’s all ”come on now people” repeated over weak tunes and of course ”oh yeah” x 10 over the outro. Most of Mad Richard’s solo stuff has been pretty dire but the three Verve albums from the nineties are magnificent, especially ”A Storm in Heaven” – to give him his due.

    Comment by Quint
    31.
    July 31, 2010
    2:06 am

    @Quint

    Paid editorial is unfortunately quite popular in music magazines these days. I’m sure they were handsomely rewarded by the good folks at Zildjian.

    Comment by Dave

    Comments on this article are now closed.


Search On The Record