On The Record

  • It’s all about priorities

    October 22, 2009 @ 9:23 am | by Jim Carroll

    This piece by Guy Barriscale about our “wonderful cultural infrastructure” contains plenty of food for thought. Barriscale is the production chief at the Regional Cultural Centre in Letterkeny, a brand spanking new state-of-the-art venue and arts centre which is located fairly near to An Grianan, another state-of-the-art venue and arts centre. I didn’t think there was that much of the aul’ art going in in Letterkenny to require two state-of-the-art centres, but there you go.

    As someone who works on venue production, Barriscale is acutely aware that Letterkenny is not alone with regards to this infrastructural over-supply. Every town in the country, it seems, has one of these “follies” which look great from the outside but which don’t have the resources to get by once the ribbon has been cut, the sandwiches have been eaten and the minister has departed in his car to open the next regional arts centre. As Barriscale notes, “an arts building without anything happening within is an expensive pile of stone, albeit an architecturally interesting one, that has won many awards.”

    But while there was once plenty of cash to fund this splurge on fancy buildings and spaces (something which, weirdly enough, further highlights the close ties between the FF/Green government and the building and developing sectors), revenue funding to do actual stuff in the buildings was always under threat. The buildings were opened and then, well, the cobwebs started to gather. Very artistic and creative cobwebs, but cobwebs nonetheless.

    Yet the mania for building has not gone quietly into the night. On the contrary, it has become something of a comfort blanket for any governmental thinking about the arts and culture. Look at the recent notion about moving the Abbey Theatre to the GPO for more of this wrong-headedness. Of course, this idea, mooted most recently in the Programme for Government (version 2.0), does take the spotlight away from cuts and slices to the day-to-day arts spend (as highlighted by Barriscale’s piece), but that’s something only a cynical observer like OTR would note.

    The thought of two national institutions coming together in the middle of O’Connell Street is such a juicy proposition that there’s probably been more words and opinions aired on this in the last 10 days than has been applied to anything the Abbey has put on in 50 years. Hey, we’ll have a rocking building! And just in time for the 1916 centenary celebrations too! That Yeats line “did that play of mine send out/certain men the English shot?” can be repeated ad nauseam to celebrate the hook-up! Who cares if there’s no cash left over to pay wages or fund a production? Just leave in a counter so folks can buy stamps and collect their pensions and you’ll be sorted. Sure, they might even buy a ticket for a play while they’re at it.

    As we’ll hear again and again before December’s budget, exchequer funding is now all about priorities. Naturally, arts funding is way down the list of priorities (the bloody minks are naturally ahead of the sector on that list) and the chances are that there may not be even enough money this time to fund a musical on the wit and wisdom of Tommy Tiernan once the cuts have been made. And when the arts sector start to grumble about this, the old “artist exemption” scab will surely be picked by certain mandarins one more time to keep them in their place.

    Let’s assume, though, there will still be some cash ear-marked for the arts sector in the rapidly dwindling kitty. Funding the arts to some extent is one of those commitments which even a draconian budget can’t quite 86 - I mean, what would the government say to the great and the good who met at Farmleigh last month and declared that culture was the way forward, if they went out and axed all arts funding?

    This, then, is a perfect time for some adjustments to be made to how this cash is spent. Do we really need more art centre “follies” when there’s no cash to keep activities in those buildings on the go? Isn’t this the time to make a proper connection between those vacant Nama buildings and makeshift, temporary arts studios and spaces which can house those who don’t want to use those arts centres? Do we really need to be spending millions on a new National Concert Hall when there isn’t even a properly scrutinised business plan in place for that new piece of flashy infrastructure?

    Any cash which is lobbed into the arts sector at this time needs to be wisely spent with long-term revenue and social capital in mind. Areas like festival tourism, a properly managed arts export scheme and investment in arts education at primary and secondary levels are just three areas which could produce a return to the exchequer in time.

    These projects don’t require any new tranches of cash just better, clever management of existing resources. The bodies to oversee and manage these areas already exist - Tourism Ireland, Culture Ireland and there must be some eager beavers at the Department of Education who’d know how to marry the arts and education - so we’re not talking about the current Minister for Fun Martin Cullen setting up brand new quangos with all that process entails. There are already plenty of European precedents for all three and it would take a phone-call - no, hold on, an e-mail, that would save a few bob - to get some expert advice on how to proceed. The returns may not happen overnight, but they will come. No more new buildings please, no more architecturally stunning buildings, no more regional arts centres which make a statement. For once, let’s spend the cash on people, not bricks and mortar.

  • 27 Comments »

    1.
    October 22, 2009
    11:22 am

    Two great articles there, nice one. Its funny (in a despairing kind of way) as exactly the same thing is happening everywhere else too. Whether its a 15 million swimmin pool in Kilarney which closed after a year (probably because they 10 pools already) or the Bertie Bowl, evoting machines, yadayadayada. About 6 months ago I attended the opening of a much hyped Arts and Technology research lab in one of our Universities. Since then its been sitting empty as there’s no plan or no money to hire anyone to actually do any work there. Its just the same stupid mistakes, over and over and over, makes my blood boil…..
    Apologies, rant over.

    Comment by E
    2.
    October 22, 2009
    11:38 am

    I was involved in a small arts project a few years ago - essentially putting soundtracks to movies by new filmmakers - and while all that was well and good, there was simply no support going around at all.

    The Arts Council do some good, but when there is so little actually making it down to the artist, there’s very little one can actually do.

    Eventually I closed up shop, because I was left utterly penniless. It was a great thing to do, but unless an active interest in taken in arts in this country, then the buildings shall remain empty.

    Comment by Leigh O'Gorman
    3.
    October 22, 2009
    11:43 am

    E - no need to apologise - all you’re doing is pointing out the bleedin’ obvious using an example you saw at first hand. It’s as clear as can be that we don’t need more fancy buildings - we need the cash to do stuff in the buildings we have. But the current government - as we’ve seen from this ridiculous Abbey+GPO=Eureka! thinking - feel the arts sectors need their ludicrous empty centres

    Leigh - again, the disconnect between realising that funding and assisting the arts means actually funding and assisting those who make the bloody art to begin with! It’s not about handouts and subsidies - though some theatre groups seem to think that should be the case - but using existing resources in a better and more meaningful way. Hence the three suggestions at the end of the piece.

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    4.
    October 22, 2009
    11:50 am

    Hi Jim,
    Unfortunately it was several years ago and I was (much) young(er) at the time and now have become far too jaded and bitter.

    Well… maybe bitter is the wrong word, but it was a long experience that has somewhat tainted my view to a degree.

    Comment by Leigh O'Gorman
    5.
    October 22, 2009
    12:05 pm

    Ok so we can’t afford to make the Liberty Hall Playhouse permanent; can we at least agree, in the words of Ann Peebles, to tear the thing down?

    Comment by brian
    6.
    October 22, 2009
    12:28 pm

    What depresses me more than anything is that we see the same attitude, again and again, in every institution, from top the bottom. It always about short-term, surface level changes, while the long term, “real” changes that people actually want and need are ignored. Of course in a general sense this isn’t just an irish problem. No real meaningful change has occurred to the global financial system after the recent meltdown either. Still though, I’m really pessimistic about the ability of these people to actually truly change and start thinking.

    Comment by E
    7.
    October 22, 2009
    12:40 pm

    You only have to look at the number of hospital beds lying empty in what were state of the art five years ago hospital wings, to see, even in an area that is supposedly high priority, the lack of forethought in this country. Hospital beds lie empty, machines unused because there is no money to pay for people to operate them.

    The same in the arts. The ‘build it and they will come’ attitude doesn’t work. The funding for these showcase buildings doesn’t exist and so they lie empty, white elephants to remind us of the good times. Trying to organise an event in these buildings is tied up in bureaucracy… oh no we couldn’t hold that type of event in our lovely building say councils all over the country.
    What will be different now? Nothing, so long as the fuddy duddy councils who make decisions as to how they are used continue in place, unmoved in their old-fashioned opinions.

    Comment by Ruth
    8.
    October 22, 2009
    1:19 pm

    E and Ruth - you’re both touched on the same thing, It’s the will to change as much as the money which is missing. It’s much easier for all concerned to simply go through the motions and stick with what they know - hence why that crazy notion about the Abbey & GPO Is in the ether and why there’s €250 million or some such crazy figure ear-marked for the NCH redo. Do we really need such a mad crazy capital splurge in the arts sector when the money is needed much more urgently in other
    areas? Or is the need to keep builders and developers happy of more concern to this government than the rest of the nation?

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    9.
    October 22, 2009
    1:34 pm

    Very interesting piece indeed. I visited the new arts building in Carlow two weeks ago (architecturally stunning: check. a bit empty: check.), which I sadly suspect will go the same route as the other examples mentioned above. What’s interesting is that only 25 miles down the road in Kilkenny they manage to have a thriving year-round arts scene as well as asuccessful arts festival, blues/roots festival and comedy festival. All this without having any major theatre or gallery in the town, or any significant new buildings to house the festivals. They seem to appreciate that if you bring the music/comedians/art that people want to see, then the location is secondary. Plus it allows local businesses to be an intrinsic part of the success of the project, which spreads around the goodwill as well as the money. God knows as a Carlowman I’d love the place to be transformed into a cultural mecca but will an “expensive pile of stone” light the blue touchpaper? I doubt it. Finally, I was in the Abbey for the first time earlier this year and was really impressed with how beautiful the stage was, there was nice seating, a lovely bar. You’d have to question why they want to move. Theatre hasn’t been particularly popular with the great unwashed masses for a good few decades at this point, are we expecting an upturn?

    Comment by chris
    10.
    October 22, 2009
    2:05 pm

    Personally, I don’t think we need to spend more money on more buildings. Yes, cultural institutions need to be there - they exist aplenty and these do need to be refurbished and standards maintained (I can’t count the number of times I have been in venues and wondered about the bad seating/sound/lighting/toilets) - but we also need to find some way in which to engage the public with them - there needs to be something happening in them, to make people come to them, a post office in the lobby will increase the footfall… to the lobby, not through the doors to the venue itself. Just because a venue is on a main street, doesn’t mean that people will go to it.
    Too much money was spent in the past on flashy new buildings and not enough on encouraging new talent.
    The parameters for much arts funding are based on business models, which don’t suit or work for artists, but all government want to see are financial returns, and again we return to the question, how do you value an artistic creation?
    Also, it doesn’t seem to matter how vocal people are outside of the boards that make the decisions, it seems to me, that once they are on said boards, they become muted and despite working within the system, seem to shy away from challenging the work practices that already exist, leading to more of the same.

    Comment by Ruth
    11.
    October 22, 2009
    2:10 pm

    When it comes to arts centres, it seems that the success is very much dependent on how well an arts centre is run.

    With cutbacks, and lack of co-ordinated vision, it is likely that new buildings could lie idle, and then of course infrastructure costs are a terrible waste of money. But i do believe some of these centres if run well, are a resource for their communities, and can make money not just for themselves but for the cultural tourism that results from their existence.

    As one of the people who live outside the city, while one has to acknowledge the inevitability of cutbacks, it scares me terribly what might happen arts & music centres throughout the country, if cutbacks are severe. Maybe we wont be allowed to have an arts centre.

    Musical entertainment is one of the things that has helped get me through the recession. It has mental health benefit. Im sure theatre and the visual arts etc has a similar effect for others.

    I think it was mentioned here before, but cinema did v well in the ’30s when it was a relatively new art form. It was profit making. I just hope the assumption isnt made that the arts have no financial return. Careful spending could help communities and their potential for tourism.

    On an aside, the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao could be considered a terrible waste of money, when in fact, spending on an opulant over-the-top museum has had a significant impact on tourism in this area of spain.

    Landmark buildings can generate employment and revenue. I hope this is remembered by the people who are making the decisions

    Comment by Finola
    12.
    October 22, 2009
    2:38 pm

    The article about Letterkenny is excellent. I was Asst Director of a State service for three years and can relate to a lot of what he is saying. As a civil servant I can’t discuss these things on the internet but I’m sure most people have come across the same situation in the arts sector and elsewhere.

    Comment by Mumblin' Deaf Ro
    13.
    October 23, 2009
    10:32 am

    Hear Hear Jim,
    Any chance of hearing your voice in the National Campaign for the Arts? www.NCFA.com
    We simply have to stop capital expenditure in the arts and dispel the notion that this creates or generates or even accommodates great art. The artists of the country are leaving in their droves or hanging on by a thread.

    Comment by Jen
    14.
    October 23, 2009
    11:30 am

    Any chance of hearing your voice in the National Campaign for the Arts?

    Jen - Nope. For the plain simple reason that I’m not an artist or active participant in the sector. As a journalist, I also need to reserve the right to give out if or when such a fine and august group of well-meaning people agree to something I don’t like. Plus, to paraphrase Groucho Marx, I don’t like the idea of joining any club or group who would welcome someone as crazy as me as a member.

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    15.
    October 23, 2009
    11:44 am

    Hey Jim,
    You could be the hard-line authoritarian that sits silently in the corner whilst smoking a pipe and taking notes.

    Comment by Leigh O'Gorman
    16.
    October 23, 2009
    11:46 am

    You could be the hard-line authoritarian that sits silently in the corner whilst smoking a pipe and taking notes.

    Leigh - I believe that role has been filled

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    17.
    October 23, 2009
    11:55 am

    Specifically in the area of music I wonder if there’s any scope for setting up some kind of tax incentive scheme for advertisers, filmmakers etc encouraging them to use Irish music? Seems it’s pretty much the only way for musicians to make money these days.

    Comment by Mike Glennon
    18.
    October 23, 2009
    3:27 pm

    Bring back Passion Machine’ and their wonderful plays. Life as it really was in the late 70’s early eighties, passionately run by passionate people with lots of creativity and no cash. Maybe artists need to step back from business? Yes Art needs it, but perhaps not in the way business thinks Art needs it, not everything come down to a business plan - or it shouldn’t but fully agree with all the points about buildings. The most desolate space is that designed for life, art and all that shite sitting idle - monuments to an architects vision and some builder who knew someone in Arts Culture and Whatever they’re calling themselves this week. They remind me of a barrren womb Per haps out of this mess will emerge some of the finest art this country has ever produced . I look at my fifteen year old and his pals who discuss philosophy , the Universe, music, literature, all while they’re kicking a ball about (and on ‘de Nortside’. And no I’m not naive - I know about all the ’secret’ teenagy stuff (I think!) I think we may be moving into a Golden Age…and I’ll be flippin’ dead and miss it!

    Comment by Evelyn Walsh
    19.
    October 25, 2009
    6:01 pm

    “Do we really need such a mad crazy capital splurge in the arts sector when the money is needed much more urgently in other areas? Or is the need to keep builders and developers happy of more concern to this government than the rest of the nation?”

    Well government-funded infrastructure projects don’t have anything to do with developers…

    Comment by Dave
    20.
    October 27, 2009
    8:45 am

    Same situation in Galway. The city is spending 4 million on an art-house cinema that will sit beside the city museum that is not exactly crammed with artifacts. 4 million quid on a building + 200/300k annual running costs - money that could be better spent on funding actual film-making (there isn’t exactly a stack of Galway art movies sitting on a shelf somewhere for the want of an art cinema to show them).
    The salient point is :- it was Galway art organizations that campaigned for this boondoggle in the first place. There seems to be more value put on a shiny building than creating actual art.

    Comment by John Smyth
    21.
    October 27, 2009
    8:53 am

    Dave @ 19 - Well government-funded infrastructure projects don’t have anything to do with developers…

    Yes, they do, when it’s a new build on a virgin site and it involves a land purchase.

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    22.
    October 27, 2009
    10:55 am

    Is architecture not considered an art form?

    Comment by Finola
    23.
    October 27, 2009
    12:38 pm

    Is architecture not considered an art form?

    Finola - don’t think so.

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    24.
    October 28, 2009
    1:28 am

    Yes, they do, when it’s a new build on a virgin site and it involves a land purchase.

    Such as the GPO?

    Comment by Dave
    25.
    October 28, 2009
    10:17 am

    Dave - er, I don’t know what you are getting at here. As I said above, developers are often - usually - involved when it’s a new build on a virgin site as has happened all over the country. In the case of the GPO/Abbey, this is just an aspiration which will never get beyond the “wouldn’t this be a nice idea?” stage.

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    26.
    October 29, 2009
    7:38 pm

    Did you see Ben Barnes letter to the paper today pitching for the Abbey to move Grand Canal Dock? That theatre’s going to struggle to function independently. Maybe if this GPO plan bites the dust a few beans could be thrown DEAF-wards.

    There’s some ad for an arts website on the radio that goes on about an oak that ends up being part of a stage, which mirrors exactly the complaint of badly thought out buldings having mahogany stages you couldn’t nail anything too.

    Comment by Major Alfonso
    27.
    October 29, 2009
    8:15 pm

    Leave a comment


    • (will not be published)


Search On The Record

 
Close
E-mail It