• RSS
  • Text Size:
  • -
  • irishtimes.com - Posted: May 28, 2009 @ 10:16 am

    Online campaigning: visionary or window-dressing? Discuss

    Kilian Doyle

    Labour candidate in the Tallaght ward for the South Dublin County Council election Dermot Looney has issued a brave boast. He claims that his online campaign is the “biggest and best” out of several thousand local election candidates in Ireland.

    Them’s fighting words, fella. Methinks the Greens, who seem to be on a mission to take over the whole Internet, may have a thing or two to say about that.

    To give Looney credit, he has been running his blog for years, with – he says – great success.  Not only that, but he has deftly cut the slaggers off at the pass by calling it the The Looney Left, which is a gesture of self-deprecation rarely seen among politicians.

    As anyone with even a passing interest in elections is aware, Irish political parties have embraced the Internet this year in a way never before seen, undoubtedly inspired by the success of the Obama campaign’s online mobilisation prior to last year’s US presidential elections, which changed politics forever.

    From MEPs with big budgets to lowly aspirant town council members, Irish candidates, like Obama’s team, are using every tool at their disposal, from websites to blogs to Facebook to Youtube to Twitter, in a bid to reach as many potential voters as possible. And, lest we forget, fundraise. 

    However, Ireland and the US are very different animals. The sheer scale of the US, which has a population nearly 75 times the size of ours and 140 times the land mass, means it is simply unfeasible for a US presidential candidate to knock on every door or even speak in every city. The internet was therefore quite simply the only possible way to reach everyone.

    While the same could be said for the large European election constituencies, most Irish politicians do not have the excuse of being unable to cover all the ground, particularly in the local elections, where candidates are vying to represent relatively small electorates. It could be argued that no matter how visible their online presence, there is still no substitute for politicians wearing out shoe leather and pressing the flesh.

    Or is there? What do you think? Is Politics 2.0  worthwhile, a waste of time or a bit of both?

  • 11 Comments »

    1.
    May 28, 2009
    11:46 am

    I think there is not much to be gained by a politician spending much time on twitter etc during and election. The gain vs rewards are low and indeed negative. More people could be canvasses in an evening then will interact with a politician on twitter. As you mention meeting everyone is not difficult in Ireland compared to the US. However there is possibly a argument to be made for blogging tweeting etc outside of an election cycle and keeping people informed of what you are doing. It might help come election time when people ask what you have done the last 5 years if they have been reading what you have been doing for the last 5 years.

    However if you look at Ciaran Cuffe of the Greens in a well off constituency with high computer ownership he gets very little traffic his way and no one pays much attention to his blog which he posts often on for a few years now. So looking at the evidence there is not much use in politicians blogging IMO

    Comment by simon
    2.
    May 28, 2009
    12:39 pm

    In fairness, Labour has been doing online (and doing it right) for years. Long before the Greens even realised it existed.

    Comment by Keith
    4.
    May 28, 2009
    1:26 pm

    To be honest, I wouldn’t pay much attention to a candidate at the door. I’ve been doorstepped by too many annoying FF canvassers — and worst of all, Bertie himself, who for a while there was impossible to avoid in Dublin Central!

    give me a candidate using facebook/twitter/a blog to communicate with her constituents, and responsive to comments and email (very important!), and I’m much happier….

    Comment by Justin
    5.
    May 28, 2009
    1:55 pm

    In my area for the local elections (Dundrum) we have a candidate who is predominatley web based. Independent Stephen O’Shea uses twitter and google maps to correspond daily with constituents and potential voters.
    Maybe its time to call a complete halt to the bloated poster campaign been waged by the major parties and force virtual campaigns upon them.

    Comment by Cyril
    6.
    May 28, 2009
    2:12 pm

    The Looney Left hasn’t just been going for a while, it’s hilariously written and very insightful. Even as general blogs go, it’s good.

    I had a look at this for a while and came to a similar conclusion that Simon (first commenter) came to. Basically, it may be useful to blog outside of the election cycle on a weekly basis, but otherwise, the impact is negligible.

    I’ve written on this topic before here – http://markcoughlan.com/twolitics-plogging-whatever-yere-having/

    Interesting post. What’s your take on it Killian?

    Comment by Mark Coughlan
    7.
    May 28, 2009
    2:38 pm

    Mark: My take on it is broadly similar to the one you outlined in your own blogpost.

    Briefly, as a way of getting exposure to the masses relatively cheaply, the Internet and associated online tools are unequalled.

    If you can use a blog or website to clearly articulate your position on issues in an understandable way and are willing and able to take and answer questions from potential voters, it will stand you in good stead. Even more so if you archive all your responses so future voters can see that you have been consistent on issues or, if you get elected, have kept your promises.

    I’m still a bit circumspect about Twitter. While I personally find it useful, I’m making it my business to wade through the acres of dross to find interesting nuggets. The vast majority of people simply haven’t the time or inclination to do likewise. And Facebook makes my toes curl.

    Youtube is a potential electioneering goldmine. A video that can be put together for buttons can reach a huge audience that would otherwise only be reached through expensive television advertising.

    But the most important factor when prepping a video is to make it interesting, eye-catching and engaging. They spread by people forwarding them to each other. Nobody will forward a staid video of a man in a suit droning on predictably about saving jobs and boosting the economy. That will grab nobody’s attention and is a waste of time. To give them credit, the Green Party and Labour are making a good fist of it. While I may have taken the mickey out of it, I bet more people watched Snoop Doggy Kelly’s cheesy rap video than Fianna Fail’s latest glossy election broadcast.

    That said, it has to be accepted that while the Internet may well be the future, we’re living in the present.

    No matter how technologically advanced many Irish voters may be, there is still a huge constituency out there to whom the Internet is just goobledegook. To reach them, there is no substitute for knocking on doors, pressing the flesh and kissing babies. Candidates who over-emphasise the power of technology could do well to remember that.

    Comment by Kilian Doyle
    8.
    May 28, 2009
    3:19 pm

    Keith, don’t be such a baby. John Gormley was the first member of the Dail with an email address, but let’s not make this into a p1ssing contest.

    Labour had the best online campaign by far in 2007. Really engaging and interactive. And they *lost* a seat.

    Was broadband a major factor? Well, with much greater numbers online, we should see some differences this year, but it’s impossible really to measure the impact the internet has on voting behaviour. I have however spoken to about a dozen students writing thesis on this very subject, so perhaps some empiricism will eventually emerge.

    I think in 2009 online will be more important than it was in 07, but it’s real value, in my opinion, is as a tool for improving organisation and focused engagement not mass communication.

    I do agree that there is loads to be gained from local election candidates (and councillors) having a blog and establishing themselves online as an authoritative source of information in their area.

    Also, Simon, re Ciaran’s blog, a hell of a lot of pol cors use it as a source and, he just told me, he gets a few hundred people (unique visitors, that is), dropping by each week. That’s more, I imagine, than the number of people dropping into TD’s constituency offices (though, of course, Ciaran’s viewers are not necessarily all constituents of his).

    Comment by Damian
    9.
    May 28, 2009
    6:12 pm

    technology is just another communication tool – the real problem here is that people are not engaged with politics – they do not see the link between their wage packet and a number they put in a box every 4 years (our current system)

    Comment by Ross O'Mullane
    10.
    May 29, 2009
    8:10 am

    Too true Ross,
    Believing is seeing for the Irish. But human nature, or indeed, limbic nature being what it is, the political aspirants will embrace whatever technology that works, in due course. The little birds learn to conquer the milktops…. given time.

    Comment by The Bogside Artists
    11.
    May 29, 2009
    10:49 am

    Labour has by far been most proactive in terms of online activity.
    Another Labour e.g. Senator Alan Kelly’s rap vid with nearly 8,000 hits now.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9Z1E_-2EmY&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ewikio%2Eco%2Euk%2Fvideo%2F1181693&feature=player_embedded

    Need I say anymore.
    It’s effective and in my experience has interested the otherwise apolitical electorate into voting!!

    Comment by Kirsten

    Leave a comment

    When submitted, your comment will be moderated and, once approved, will appear on the site.

    The Irish Times reserves the absolute right not to publish comments.


Search Campaign Watch