Business

  • Another crazy Ryanair extra charge

    June 8, 2009 @ 1:17 pm | by John Collins

    Ryanair are masters of the additional charge - how else do you think they can fly you for 1cent plus taxes? Additional fees are central to why they have been so profitable while the rest of the airline industry has been disappearing down a tube, although Michael O’Leary may be hedging his bets on whether that will continue to be the case.

    The latest wheeze is a €1 charge to send a text message to your mobile phone with your confirmation number the day before you fly. The press release carries a quote from Ryanair’s Stephen McNamara (nothing as arcance as job titles in the Ryanair world):

    “This will make travelling with Ryanair even easier as passengers will no longer have to print out their confirmation email, but simply refer to their mobile phone for their flight details.”

    The charge will also make millions for Ryanair, given that €1 a text bears absolutely no relation to the economic cost of providing the service.  The wholesale cost of sending a text is a few cent and given Ryanair’s ability to wring the best value out of its suppliers you can bet they are paying one of the best rates around.

    Personally, on the rare occassions when I fly Ryanair, I’ll use Vodafone’s web-based service to send me a delayed text (you can set it to send a text at any time in the coming week) with my confirmation number. Cost to me? 0 cent.

    Oh and thanks to the New York Times for spotting this old ad for Alaska Airways. Don’t get me started on Mr O’Leary’s proposals for toilet charges on his captive passengers.

  • Vincent O’Brien

    June 2, 2009 @ 1:40 pm | by Barry O'Halloran

    At 3.45 next Saturday, 13 horses will line up at Epsom to contest this year’s Derby, the race that defines the thoroughbred.

     All bar two of them can trace their ancestry directly to horses trained by the late Vincent O’Brien, who died on Monday at his home in Straffan, Co Kildare.

    That, and the fact that it it almost certain to go to an Irish-trained horse, are probably the most fitting tributes to a man who is recognised as having been the greatest racehorse trainer in the sport’s 300-year-plus history.

    But it’s also a reminder of something else - O’Brien’s enormous contribution to this country and most importantly its economy. On the back of his training skills, he became the architect of Coolmore Stud, the Tipperary-based breeding operation with divisions in the US and Australia, that is recognised as the world leader in its field.

    To put this in context, Coolmore is to racehorse breeding and bloodstock what Intel is to technology. And the foundation’s of its success are laid on O’Brien’s ability to spot raw talent in the sales ring, mould it into a top class racehorse and ultimately a stallion, or in  economic terms, an asset worth tens of millions of euro.

    He also played a key role in globalising the both the sport and the breeding industry, which meant he was bringing US investors to Ireland long before the IDA.

    The result was that he put Ireland at the centre of a multi-million, multi-national business, and not just Ireland, but rural Ireland, where there were few economic opportunities. This, combined with the stud-fee tax break, drew other bloodstock investors here. As a result, a broadly-based industry, whose influence can be seen throughout the world, sprang up here.

    The seeds of the business were here all along, and good horses were always bred in this country. But there was nothing like the strength and depth that we have now, and much of that is down to O’Brien. Unfortunately there is little up-to-date information on just how much this business is worth, but one study carried out by consultants, Indecon, five years ago, found that racing and breeding employed 16,000 people and contributed 335 million euro to the Exchequer every year in taxes. These figures may have changed, but there is no reason to believe that they have dropped dramatically.

    Despite this, plenty of people, mainly politicians in search of easy headlines, have in recent years lined up to knock this business. That’s not to say that it’s above criticism. But the problems were first, that the critics largely made statements that were plain wrong, and second, their main talent seemed (and seems) to be an uncanny ability to shout louder than everyone else.

    Partly because of this, his legacy now faces the possibility that it will be eroded, and that much of its value will simply fade away over the next decade or so. This may be disappointing for people who want to cheer an Irish winner at Epsom, but it would be alot more serious for the country as a whole.

    This is an indigenous industry which makes a substantial direct contribution to the economy, employment and the Exchequer. Despite the economic achievements of the nineties and the early part of this decade, we still don’t have enough homegrown industries that deliver value. Without them, our chances of cashing in on the global economic recovery, when it comes, are limited.

    Keeping them alive should not take much effort and it’s not in our interest to allow any of them to fade away. The best memorial that Vincent O’Brien could have is that we ensure the one that he helped to develope continues to thrive.

  • Just how much is the Champions League worth?

    May 27, 2009 @ 5:18 pm | by John Collins

    Apparently the last five minutes of tonight’s Champions League final between Manchester Utd and Barcelona is not the most opportune time for your company’s computer systems to go kaput. A survey of 151 IT profeessionals, published today by Tufin Technologies (now we hadn’t heard of them either), found that 39 per cent said a technology problem in the last five minutes of the game would have to wait until after the final whistle before they looked at it. 

    Of course the last time the words “Man Utd”, “Champions League final” and “Barcelona” appeared in the same sentence the only drama of note occured in the last five minutes of an otherwise relentlessly boring game. Is is it any wonder techies think your crashed database can wait ten minutes tonight.

    Paddy Power seems to think lightening won’t strike twice. It is offering a money back offer on a range of bets if there is a goal scored after 85 minutes in normal time.

    Of course whoever wins tonight won’t just triumph on the sports field. Our colleagues in the sports department estimate that the winners will scoop €110 million in TV rights, sponsorship, prize money and other pay-offs. Other sources suggest that the English League Championship play-off (won by Burnley last Monday) is the most valuable single football game in the world adding £30-50 million (€34.5-€57.5 million) to the coffers of the winners in Sky tv money, sponsorship etc. Anyone care to resolve this one?

  • Putting the green into greenbacks

    May 22, 2009 @ 9:13 pm | by Barry O'Halloran

    The green economy is getting almost as much coverage as the green shoots of recovery these days.

    This week, the Government “unveiled” a new green energy taskforce whose job it will be to advise on how best Ireland Inc can cash in on this growing phenomenon, which Tanaiste Mary Coughlan says - though she cites no sources - will be worth 950 billion euro globally next year.

    This is not the only political green energy wheeze. There is also a sub-committee of the Oireachtas trade and enterprise committee dedicated to - wait for it - “Job Creation Through use of Renewable Energy Resources”. This was ultimately a Government idea as well, although its membership is drawn from all parties. It’s particularly interested in a project in an obscure Austrian town, Gussing, which produces all its own energy needs from wood - which is in some way linked to the fact that it’s surrounded by forest. (more…)

  • Click here to win millions. THIS IS NOT A SCAM.

    May 19, 2009 @ 4:08 pm | by Laura Slattery

    Think you’re scam-proof? Think the people who fall for lottery hoaxes and Nigerian advance fee frauds and limited-time-only pyramid schemes are all idiots? Think again, says the University of Exeter, which has produced some top research suggesting that around one in five people are vulnerable to scammers, and it’s not always who you think.

    According to the researchers, having a good background knowledge of the subject of a scam offer, such as previous investment experience, actually increases your risk of being a victim, because you fall prey to your own ego and become over-confident. Victims of scams are not poor decision makers and often have successful business or professional careers, they say. Just ask the smarting high-profile clients of Bernard Madoff and all the mini-Madoffs. But those who fall victim to frauds tend to be unduly open to persuasion by others and less able to control emotions such as excitement and greed.

    Not everyone is totally shocked when they “discover” they’ve been duped: at the back of their mind, they already know. The research found that victims often kept their decision to respond to a scam private and avoided speaking about it with family and friends, possibly because at some level they knew what they were doing was unwise. Scam victims also typically spent far more time analysing the content of the scam than non-victims - presumably searching for evidence of what they want to believe. Others treated the scam as a long-odds gamble. Told they had won a fictitious lottery, they were suspicious but paid the commission on a money transfer anyway because of the size of the possible prize relative to the initial outlay.

    It must be my inner fear of watercooler conversations and open loathing of air-conditioning systems, but it’s always the “work-at-home” frauds that make me pause - you know, the ones that exclaim “work from the comfort of your own home and earn thousands a week!!!” If I’m in a foreign city when I see those signs, I will pause for a second and think maybe, just maybe, this is legit and here’s my chance to quietly relocate in a way that both pays the rent on my fantasy bijou Euro-apartment and involves explaining myself to a minimum number of people.

    Maybe that proves I’m not greedy for untold riches, just for change and nominal self-employment. Sadly, in the real world most of those adverts involve paying upfront for expensive materials or instruction manuals, after which you will never hear from the “company” again.

    Some people never learn. The University of Exeter researchers found that people who had previously been victims of a scam were consistently more likely to respond to a scam again. Of course, we already know they’re also more likely to be targeted: if you fell for a fraud in the past and it seems like your shame is being cruelly compounded by a sudden deluge of dodgy offers and suspicious callers, you’re probably not imagining things.

    Instead, your name may have made it onto one of the most valuable commodities for the professional fraudster: a “suckers list“.

  • Wolfram Alpha for financial analysis

    @ 3:02 pm | by John Collins

    Lots of online talk over the weekend about the launch of the new search engine Wolfram Alpha and whether or not it is a worthy challenger to Google. For those who haven’t been following that debate, Wolfram Alpha is a new search tool from Wolfram Research, the team behind Mathematica, the best-selling technical computing software. The company calls it a “computational knowledge engine, offered for free on the web” but you can consider a useful fact finder.

    Where Wolfram Alpha excels is if you are looking for a specific piece of information rather than a web page. This help page provides examples of the kind of financial analysis it can help you with, from figuring out mortgage payments to the daily price for pork bellies futures. Much of that information may be available with a bit of digging on Google but Wolfram Alpha makes it easy to access and digest. Savvy investors who manage their own portfolios should add it to their arsenal of tools.

  • Bookies beat the bankers

    May 18, 2009 @ 4:10 pm | by Barry O'Halloran

    “When I was young, people called me a gambler. As the scale of my operations increased, I became known as a speculator. Now I am called a banker. But I have been doing the same thing all my life.”

    - Ernest Cassel, City of London merchant banker and financial adviser to King Edward VIII of England.

    Cassel uttered those words over a century ago,  but the Irish Stock Exchange threw up one interesting figure today that would probably have given him cause to smile. At around 3pm, Paddy Power plc was worth more than Irish Life & Permanent (IL&P), Ireland’s “third biggest” bank.

    The listed bookie’s shares were trading at 17 euro, giving it a market capitalisation of 800 million euro. IL&P was at around 2.80, a total price tag of 770 million euro. And it’s likely that Paddy Power’s shares will continue to head north, thanks to its purchase of a majority stake in Australian bookmaker, Sportsbet.

    Davy Stockbrokers published a note earlier setting a target price of 22 euro for Power. If it were to hit this, at their current prices, it would beat both Bank of Ireland and AIB by a short head in the valuation stakes.

    Given the uncertainty about the banks, the short odds that the State will take a 90 per cent stake in them and the fact that nobody knows if the National Asset Management Agency will jump the many hurdles that it faces, you’d have to say the bookie is a better bet. (more…)

  • Fighters not quitters

    @ 9:42 am | by Laura Slattery

     ”I don’t quit. I’m a fighter.” Yes, it sounds like the last gasp of a soon-to-be-fired candidate on The Apprentice, but those are the words of Gillian Bowler at Friday’s Irish Life & Permanent agm. She said pretty much the same thing in March, so it’s obviously a line that works for her, and as if to prove it she chose to wear this very on-trend sharp-shouldered leather jacket for her big day.

    Watching Bowler being interviewed by Bryan Dobson, colleagues in the office wondered whether a leather jacket was appropriate for a senior banker. (Yes, we like to lighten the mood on a Friday evening by dissecting the wardrobe of one of the few female denizens of the Irish corporate elite.) Of course, the answer was contained within the question: who in their right mind would want to dress like a banker these days? Where once greed oozed from their top pockets, now egg drips down their pinstripes and their supply of corporate branded golf umbrellas remains safely stashed in plastic.

    But the point about the shoulder-padded jacket is that it was fashion armour. It allowed Bowler to sound contrite - ”obviously, I’m ashamed of that episode” - and yet still look like she’d be capable of knocking over any dissenters with one swift swivel of her torso - “98 per cent of [shareholders] asked me stay”. And the great thing about leather, as all sofa-buying parents know, is that it’s just so very wipeable… you know, should it unceremoniously come into contact with something sticky.

    I didn’t catch the live show, but most newspaper reports have concluded that Bowler, sans her sunglasses gimmick, put in a good performance at the agm, declining to resign or sacrifice her salary with consummate ease. One shareholder who took the mic to criticise her was even reported to have been booed by other shareholders, which is quite astonishing when you think about how much paper money and pension money that the agm attendees have collectively lost under Bowler’s watch.

    For outsiders, i.e. those with no stake in what happens to Irish Life, it’s perhaps easier to believe that someone is doing the honourable thing by not resigning when they’re still best known for being in the business of offering people cheap package holidays, not overseeing the destruction of their savings or bankrupting them with 100 per cent mortgages.

    Bowler, like the most effusive Apprentice candidates, David Cameron or the entire PR profession for that matter, knows that it is not the mistake that you make but the way in which you handle the aftermath that is all anyone seems to care about these days. It is the appearance of being decisive, not whether the decisions are the right ones, that counts. When Cameron got up early on Tuesday and told reporters that he was personally very ”angry” about “out of order” moat-dredging, chandelier-fixing expense claims by Conservative MPs and was “going to deal with it”, by the end of the day the BBC and Sky News were agreeing that he had scored political points, not lost them. Already, the British media had stopped talking about the Tory squirearchy’s toxic, taxpayer-funded lives of lavish entitlement and had moved the story on to a more simplistic Cameron v Brown, round 487.

    I found that bizarre to watch, but then we indulge in a similar kind of selective short-term memory when we find ourselves admiring Bowler for her cool poise… or distracted by her sartorial confidence. Sure, “someone had to stay on and clear up the mess”, but should retaining a well-paid position despite a major scandal really sound so much like doing everyone a favour? Bowler has distanced herself from the €7.5 billion Anglo Irish Bank deposit transfer, among IL&P’s other failings, but should she be allowed to?

  • Norwegian firm gets customers working for them

    May 14, 2009 @ 12:32 pm | by John Collins

    norway.jpg

    As strategies to beat the recession, getting your customers to do the work for you, sounds like an ideal, if unattainable one. Not so according to this story on technology news site Ars Technica, which caught our eye.

    Lyse, a small electricity provider, has become Norway’s leading provider of high-speed fibre optic-based services by providing faster service at the same price as its competitors but also by getting customers dig their own trenches to lay the cables. The company now has 130,000 subscribers for its broadband, TV and telephony services with many of them availing of a discount on installation by digging a trench to the side of the road where they can connect to Lyse’s network.

    Somehow I can’t see debt-laden Eircom adopting this approach but some of the other telco providers could do worse than have a look.

    Photo credit: CH/Innovation Norway

  • “Youth” appeal wins Late Late chair for Tubridy

    May 11, 2009 @ 7:12 pm | by Laura Slattery

    Here is your host… Ryan Tubridy. “I won’t be mangling it,” he promises. Instead, he will be giving the “old name” of the Late Late Show a ”21st century twist”. Of course, Tubridy’s current Saturday night vehicle is based on the Letterman / Leno ironic-banter-plus-house-band style that came to prominence almost 20 years ago, so presumably it won’t simply be a question of taking that format and dumping it onto Friday nights.

    As our media and marketing columnist Siobhan O’Connell writes here, advertising executives reckoned that Tubridy was the better bet for winning back younger viewers to the show, so they will be pleased by this evening’s announcement by RTÉ. His brand of dapper-suited “young fogey” wit - he’s 35, according to Wikipedia, unless that’s just another hoax - was seen to have more appeal to the ad-friendly under 40s than Miriam O’Callaghan or Gerry Ryan. Tubridy has also been more than generous in the amount of material that he has, unwittingly or otherwise, supplied to the tabloids with which RTÉ has a relationship of mutual dependency.

    For his part, RTÉ television chief Noel Curran says the broadcaster is looking “afresh” at the Late Late, but that it will still have the same mix of “entertainment, social issues and interaction”. Interesting. The Late Late’s schedule of product-promoting celebrity, ad break, formal discussion about a current affair, viewer competition, repeat to fade… is a laborious cocktail and unusual for a prime time programme: most shows that have to negotiate awkward “and now for something completely different” moments are broadcast during daylight hours. Here was the chance to jettison those social ish-oo group therapy sessions - or “let’s have a heated debate” as Mrs Merton used to say - into another outlet, away from Friday nights, when most people are looking for light relief not strident soap-boxing.

    But the big question is will the elusive younger audience really return to the Friday night “let’s see who’s on the Late Late” couch? Tubridy’s appointment will win column inches, but what he really needs is YouTube-able moments.

Close
E-mail It